Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 September 11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 06:04, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No meaningful tests (just compares a broken invocation of this module to the empty string, which always fails. Much more useful tests for Module:User contrib are available at Template:User contrib/testcases, but this title is too obscure to be a useful redirect there. I can't figure out how to tag /testcases pages, so haven't done so here. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:12, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. There's an issue (now being tracked on phab) but if and when that's resolved they'll stop throwing errors. Primefac (talk) 15:21, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abandoned, misnamed sandboxes. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:32, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For anyone else thrown off by the history, this comes from Module:Jct/city/sandbox I believe. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 19:27, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
These pages are currently not viewable (or deletable) due to phab:T263340. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:14, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Replace (subst:) with Infobox settlement and delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:23, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Replace (subst:) with Infobox settlement and delete

"city Japan"-specific wrapper for {{Infobox settlement}}, there is no such wrapper for "city India / China / Korea / Thailand / Vietnam / Pakistan / Canada / United States / Mexico / Colombia / Brazil ... ". Subst:itution will reduce the maintenance overhead, reduce the cognitive burden for editors, and enable articles to benefit more immediately from improvements to the current parent template.

78.54.131.50 (talk) 14:24, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Brisbane Ferry templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete -FASTILY 04:19, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deprecated {{s-line}} templates replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Brisbane Ferries. Fleet Lists (talk) 05:16, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 10:29, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Originally nominated for speedy deletion by @Gonnym with the reason "Doc says used in Template:Note row" FASTILY 03:28, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Then could you please cite the exact passage from WP:CSD#G8 that permits such templates to be deleted? For the record, I'm not arguing against deletion, but I do think CSD should only be applied to clear-cut cases where specific policy can be cited. -FASTILY 09:42, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pages dependent on a non-existent or deleted page - the template states that it used in {{Note row}}. That template was deleted, so this template is dependent on a deleted page. --Gonnym (talk) 10:27, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's the section heading for G8, which is obviously going to be a general statement. The following line, Examples include:, clarifies situations where G8 may be applied, and none of the examples match up with the scenario we have here. I interpret CSD pretty loosely, but even this is a stretch for me. OTOH, I'd strongly support an RfC amending G8 to include this scenario. -FASTILY 22:13, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Subst and soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 06:55, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only used in the userspace of editors who have been inactive for years. Recommend subst and delete * Pppery * it has begun... 01:10, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Subst and delete. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 06:46, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only used once, on a page that hasn't been edited in 3 years. Recommend subst and delete * Pppery * it has begun... 01:02, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).