Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests
Appearance
If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."
If you are here because you want an admin to approve of your new article or your proposed page move, you are in the wrong place.
|
- To list a technical request: Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
{{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
the - If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
- If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.
Technical requests
[edit]Uncontroversial technical requests
[edit]- Saint Endelienta → Endelient (currently a redirect back to Saint Endelienta) (move · discuss) – more concise; Nicholas Orme's The Saints of Cornwall and the Oxford Dictionary of Saints give her name as "Endelient", because the -a is a later Latin addition. there are roughly the same amount of google search results for both versions. results for "Endelienta" seem to be more focused on an arts organization of that name than on the medieval saint. ... sawyer * he/they * talk 22:43, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ram Khamhaeng → Ramkhamhaeng (currently a redirect back to Ram Khamhaeng) (move · discuss) – I've personally never seen Ramkhamhaeng spelled as two separate words in English (speaking as someone from Thailand, and it isn't parsed as two words in Thai either). It's almost always a single word, as seen in Ramkhamhaeng University. The single word spelling is also used in books such as David K. Wyatt's "Thailand: Short History" or Baker’s and Phongpaichit’s “A History of Ayutthaya” (and a Google Ngram search should show the single word spelling is more popular as well) Stantic (talk) 02:56, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Requests to revert undiscussed moves
[edit]Contested technical requests
[edit]- Lockerbie (miniseries) → Lockerbie (TV series) (currently a redirect instead to Lockerbie (disambiguation)) (move · discuss) – Two telly dramas are being released in short space of each other, one has the byline 'search for truth,' the other has been mistakenly placed as a 'miniseries.' TV series is the correct format backed by references on page Halbared (talk) 15:04, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Per WP:NCTV, this disambiguation is correct for a six-part limited series. The "TV series" page should actually redirect to the Lockerbie disambiguation page. -- Wikipedical (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- In the UK, one year programmes (one series) are referred to as serials, dramas, or just series. From two episodes up to six or whathaveyou. The references on page all refer to Lockerbie as the new drama or series.Halbared (talk) 09:52, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- "Lockerbie (TV serial)" would be an uncontested alternative. -- Wikipedical (talk) 18:25, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- (TV serial) is not one of the tags proposed by WP:NCTV. 162 etc. (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Would also propose "Lockerbie (serial)" then. It's true, there was no stated consensus at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (television)/Archive 17#RFC: Should we use "(serial)" or "(TV serial)"?, though "(TV serial)" is used more frequently in practice for British miniseries/limited series. Feel free to open a requested move discussion if you'd like. -- Wikipedical (talk) 21:24, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- OK, thank you WIkipedical.Halbared (talk) 17:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Would also propose "Lockerbie (serial)" then. It's true, there was no stated consensus at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (television)/Archive 17#RFC: Should we use "(serial)" or "(TV serial)"?, though "(TV serial)" is used more frequently in practice for British miniseries/limited series. Feel free to open a requested move discussion if you'd like. -- Wikipedical (talk) 21:24, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- (TV serial) is not one of the tags proposed by WP:NCTV. 162 etc. (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- "Lockerbie (TV serial)" would be an uncontested alternative. -- Wikipedical (talk) 18:25, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- In the UK, one year programmes (one series) are referred to as serials, dramas, or just series. From two episodes up to six or whathaveyou. The references on page all refer to Lockerbie as the new drama or series.Halbared (talk) 09:52, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Per WP:NCTV, this disambiguation is correct for a six-part limited series. The "TV series" page should actually redirect to the Lockerbie disambiguation page. -- Wikipedical (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Sri Lankan Tamils → Eelam Tamils (currently a redirect back to Sri Lankan Tamils) (move · discuss) – It is the common name used for referring this ethnolinguistic group and It is also how they identify themselves with. Yarohj (talk) 13:52, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Yarohj If you read the discussion at Talk:Sri Lankan Tamils#RfC about inclusion of additional name for an ethnic group, while there was consensus for including the term in the article, there did not seem to be consensus that the article should be moved. You'd need to open a move discussion by clicking the "discuss" link in your request above. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:58, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Yarohj If you read the discussion at Talk:Sri Lankan Tamils#RfC about inclusion of additional name for an ethnic group, while there was consensus for including the term in the article, there did not seem to be consensus that the article should be moved. You'd need to open a move discussion by clicking the "discuss" link in your request above. --Ahecht (TALK
- Coaster → Coaster (disambiguation) (currently a redirect back to Coaster) (move · discuss) – the primary topic is now incorrectly and confusingly under the title "trivet", which doesn't even mean "coaster" in American English Espoo (talk) 15:48, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Pot coaster (or trivet) is not even close to being the primary topic (in terms of pageviews) of the term "coaster": current massviews, trivet prior to move RachelTensions (talk) 18:34, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Global Savings Group → Atolls (currently a redirect instead to Atoll) (move · discuss) – The company Global Savings Group rebranded to Atolls in September 2024. 212.123.210.42 (talk) 16:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Per WP:NAMECHANGES, we need some evidence that third-party reliable sources are using the new name, not just that it's an internal rebrand... — Amakuru (talk) 16:14, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- And in any case, Atolls is currently a redirect to atoll and it's questionable whether the company would be the primary topic for the word. Station1 (talk) 17:42, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- It is absolutely impossible that the company is the primary topic. 162 etc. (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed, what about moving it to Atolls (company) or something similar? 212.123.210.42 (talk) 08:20, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- It is absolutely impossible that the company is the primary topic. 162 etc. (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Here are some:
- - https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/atolls
- - https://www.munich-startup.de/104775/gsg-rebranding-atolls/
- - https://www.deutsche-startups.de/2024/09/17/startupticker-atolls-win-runtastic/
- - https://www.bloomberg.com/profile/company/1548100D:GR 212.123.210.42 (talk) 08:23, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- And in any case, Atolls is currently a redirect to atoll and it's questionable whether the company would be the primary topic for the word. Station1 (talk) 17:42, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Strong oppose speedy move I cannot see this contesting for primarity anytime soon -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 20:47, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Per WP:NAMECHANGES, we need some evidence that third-party reliable sources are using the new name, not just that it's an internal rebrand... — Amakuru (talk) 16:14, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- List of municipalities in Tamil Nadu → List of urban local bodies in Tamil Nadu (currently a redirect back to List of municipalities in Tamil Nadu) (move · discuss) – The page was repeatedly moved by a user without any discussion. The page lists all the urban local bodies and not the municipalities alone and the previous title as such was as such correct. M2 (talk) 05:03, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- This page has a history of undiscussed moves:
- 16 April 2023 - created as "List of municipalities in Tamil Nadu"
- 24 May 2024 - moved to "List of urban local bodies in Tamil Nadu"
- 12 November 2024 - moved to "List of Municipality in Tamil Nadu"
- 12 November 2024 - moved to "List of Municipalities in Tamil Nadu"
- 12 November 2024 - moved (back) to "List of municipalities in Tamil Nadu"
- So I'm inclined to say the current name, which is also the original name, is the most stable status quo given that the first move was less than 6 months ago. Probably an RM is needed to sort things out anyway. — Amakuru (talk) 20:28, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- This page has a history of undiscussed moves:
- Prusik knot → Prusik hitch (currently a redirect back to Prusik knot) (move · discuss) – the Prusik is a hitch, not a knot. Mtnguideben (talk) 16:38, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- A hitch is a type of knot, so I'm not convinced the proposed move would particularly be an improvement. However, what I do think woudl be sensible would be to simply move to Prusik. There's no ambiguity, it's more concise, and per ngrams it seems the simple form enjoys a very large lead over both ... knot and ... hitch combined. — Amakuru (talk) 21:03, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Revert back to Prusik, undoing an undiscussed move from 2021. 162 etc. (talk) 04:24, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- A hitch is a type of knot, so I'm not convinced the proposed move would particularly be an improvement. However, what I do think woudl be sensible would be to simply move to Prusik. There's no ambiguity, it's more concise, and per ngrams it seems the simple form enjoys a very large lead over both ... knot and ... hitch combined. — Amakuru (talk) 21:03, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Mtnguideben Appears contentious. Will probably benefit from a full RM discussion to see community input. Raladic (talk) 03:47, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Administrator needed
[edit]- Israel–Hezbollah conflict (2023–present) → Israel–Hezbollah conflict (2023–2024) (move) – There seems to be consensus at Talk:Israel–Hezbollah_conflict_(2023–present)#Options that the scope of this article should be until Sep 30, 2024. No one has contested it thus far. However, if anyone has any objections, let me know and I will start a RfC to discuss this. VR (Please ping on reply) 00:00, 14 November 2024 (UTC)