Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Categorical logic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Categorical semantics)

Categorical logic is the branch of mathematics in which tools and concepts from category theory are applied to the study of mathematical logic. It is also notable for its connections to theoretical computer science.[1] In broad terms, categorical logic represents both syntax and semantics by a category, and an interpretation by a functor. The categorical framework provides a rich conceptual background for logical and type-theoretic constructions. The subject has been recognisable in these terms since around 1970.

Overview

[edit]

There are three important themes in the categorical approach to logic:

Categorical semantics
Categorical logic introduces the notion of structure valued in a category C with the classical model theoretic notion of a structure appearing in the particular case where C is the category of sets and functions. This notion has proven useful when the set-theoretic notion of a model lacks generality and/or is inconvenient. R.A.G. Seely's modeling of various impredicative theories, such as System F, is an example of the usefulness of categorical semantics.
It was found that the connectives of pre-categorical logic were more clearly understood using the concept of adjoint functor, and that the quantifiers were also best understood using adjoint functors.[2]
Internal languages
This can be seen as a formalization and generalization of proof by diagram chasing. One defines a suitable internal language naming relevant constituents of a category, and then applies categorical semantics to turn assertions in a logic over the internal language into corresponding categorical statements. This has been most successful in the theory of toposes, where the internal language of a topos together with the semantics of intuitionistic higher-order logic in a topos enables one to reason about the objects and morphisms of a topos as if they were sets and functions.[3] This has been successful in dealing with toposes that have "sets" with properties incompatible with classical logic. A prime example is Dana Scott's model of untyped lambda calculus in terms of objects that retract onto their own function space. Another is the Moggi–Hyland model of system F by an internal full subcategory of the effective topos of Martin Hyland.
Term model constructions
In many cases, the categorical semantics of a logic provide a basis for establishing a correspondence between theories in the logic and instances of an appropriate kind of category. A classic example is the correspondence between theories of βη-equational logic over simply typed lambda calculus and Cartesian closed categories. Categories arising from theories via term model constructions can usually be characterized up to equivalence by a suitable universal property. This has enabled proofs of meta-theoretical properties of some logics by means of an appropriate categorical algebra. For instance, Freyd gave a proof of the disjunction and existence properties of intuitionistic logic this way.

These three themes are related. The categorical semantics of a logic consists in describing a category of structured categories that is related to the category of theories in that logic by an adjunction, where the two functors in the adjunction give the internal language of a structured category on the one hand, and the term model of a theory on the other.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Goguen, Joseph; Mossakowski, Till; de Paiva, Valeria; Rabe, Florian; Schroder, Lutz (2007). "An Institutional View on Categorical Logic". International Journal of Software and Informatics. 1 (1): 129–152. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.126.2361.
  2. ^ Lawvere 1971, Quantifiers and Sheaves
  3. ^ Aluffi 2009

References

[edit]
Books

Seminal papers

Further reading

[edit]