Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/MastCell: Difference between revisions
→MastCell seeks to abuse power: MastCell seeks to abuse power. If this is deleted, look at history and recall. |
|||
| Line 180: | Line 180: | ||
==MastCell seeks to abuse power== |
==MastCell seeks to abuse power== |
||
First let me say I am a blocked user. I'm sure this will be deleted and Mastcell will probably come in and censor this but I am behooved to set the record straight on user MastCell. He should not be trusted. I am blocked user "[[user:Regulations]]." I was blocked in a blanket IP block. An administrative error was made. Many users were blocked with the claim that they were sockpuppets of user "[[user:Billy Ego]]." (The fact that they can't block me from making sockpuppets just goes to show that this IP is used for a wide geographic area for a major ISP, and that errors can easily be made. If they block this IP they block a whole area of the U.S.) Note that Billy Ego was a self-proclaimed "fascist." That's why he was blocked actually. I am a libertarian, which is the opposite. If you look at the other users that were blocked, there was no evidence of sockpuppetry other than their IP. In fact one was even an an anarcho-capitalist; his username was "[[user:Anarcho-capitalism]]" who even received awards for his or her editing. Now, MastCell knows good and well the I am not this "Billy Ego" character because he knows from the articles that he's been involved in are the same one's I've been involved in and knows that I am a libertarian, not a fascist. MastCell knows that an administrative error was made. But, when I make a sockpuppet to resume editing and he finds it, he gets the sockpuppet blocked. Of course, this is simple mindless administrative duties that an adminstrator ordinarily would not be criticized for. But, the fact that I knows I am not BillyEgo shows the lack of ethics on his part. If he had any real ETHICS he would ignore a sockpuppet of me, because he knows I am not a sockpuppet of BillyEgo. He is using this administrative error to prevent me from providing NPOV, information, and balance to medical articles. MastCell is well-known to be against heath freedom. He believes in draconian regulation and restrictions on what people may purchase and one what they may sell. He doesn't care or doesnt understand that at some point of increasing regulation it begins causing more harm than good. He tries his best to push his pro regulation POV in medical articles. (Maybe he works for the FDA). He knows I am for health freedom. And he knows that I source my edits and provide important information and balance to articles. He knows that I don't POV push but merely provide sourced information. His sole motive is to censor the other side. Make no mistake. The reason that he is seeking adminiship is because of me and others like me. He wants to be able to claim anyone that seems to represent a pro-freedom viewpoint is a sockpuppet of Billy Ego and then block them, without even a Checkuser. He is seeking adminship for the sole purpose of being able to block people without a Checkuser. MastCell should be not an adminstrator. He is abusive and unethical, and will be even more so if he is given any power. [[User:Reguboard|Reguboard]] 19:57, 9 May 2007 (UTC) |
First let me say I am a blocked user. I'm sure this will be deleted and Mastcell will probably come in and censor this but I am behooved to set the record straight on user MastCell. He should not be trusted. I am blocked user "[[user:Regulations]]." I was blocked in a blanket IP block. An administrative error was made. Many users were blocked with the claim that they were sockpuppets of user "[[user:Billy Ego]]." (The fact that they can't block me from making sockpuppets just goes to show that this IP is used for a wide geographic area for a major ISP, and that errors can easily be made. If they block this IP they block a whole area of the U.S.) Note that Billy Ego was a self-proclaimed "fascist." That's why he was blocked actually. I am a libertarian, which is the opposite. If you look at the other users that were blocked, there was no evidence of sockpuppetry other than their IP. In fact one was even an an anarcho-capitalist; his username was "[[user:Anarcho-capitalism]]" who even received awards for his or her editing. Now, MastCell knows good and well the I am not this "Billy Ego" character because he knows from the articles that he's been involved in are the same one's I've been involved in and knows that I am a libertarian, not a fascist. MastCell knows that an administrative error was made. But, when I make a sockpuppet to resume editing and he finds it, he gets the sockpuppet blocked. Of course, this is simple mindless administrative duties that an adminstrator ordinarily would not be criticized for. But, the fact that I knows I am not BillyEgo shows the lack of ethics on his part. If he had any real ETHICS he would ignore a sockpuppet of me, because he knows I am not a sockpuppet of BillyEgo. He is using this administrative error to prevent me from providing NPOV, information, and balance to medical articles. MastCell is well-known to be against heath freedom. He believes in draconian regulation and restrictions on what people may purchase and one what they may sell. He doesn't care or doesnt understand that at some point of increasing regulation it begins causing more harm than good. He tries his best to push his pro regulation POV in medical articles. (Maybe he works for the FDA). He knows I am for health freedom. And he knows that I source my edits and provide important information and balance to articles. He knows that I don't POV push but merely provide sourced information. His sole motive is to censor the other side. Make no mistake. The reason that he is seeking adminiship is because of me and others like me. He wants to be able to claim anyone that seems to represent a pro-freedom viewpoint is a sockpuppet of Billy Ego or me, Regulations, and then block them, without even a Checkuser. He is seeking adminship for the sole purpose of being able to block people without a Checkuser. MastCell should be not an adminstrator. He is abusive and unethical, and will be even more so if he is given any power. [[User:Reguboard|Reguboard]] 19:57, 9 May 2007 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 20:00, 9 May 2007
MastCell's edit stats using "wannabe Kate" tool as of 00:05, 5 May 2007 (UTC):
User:MastCell
run at Sat May 5 00:05:27 2007 GMT
Category talk: 2
Category: 5
Image talk: 7
Image: 4
Mainspace 2250
Talk: 1242
User talk: 675
User: 104
Wikipedia talk: 80
Wikipedia: 460
avg edits per page 4.53
earliest 04:28, 1 August 2006
number of unique pages 1067
total 4829
2006/8 392
2006/9 358
2006/10 537
2006/11 338
2006/12 296
2007/1 470
2007/2 656
2007/3 978
2007/4 711
2007/5 93
(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red denotes edits without an edit summary)
Mainspace
188 AIDS reappraisal
112 Cholangiocarcinoma
103 Steven Milloy
84 Emergency contraception
71 Ephedra
68 Christine Maggiore
57 Duesberg hypothesis
49 Depo-Provera
48 Acute myeloid leukemia
45 Quackwatch
43 Food and Drug Administration
40 Matthias Rath
39 Hulda Regehr Clark
38 Blood transfusion
32 HIV test
Talk:
142 AIDS reappraisal
108 Emergency contraception
108 Quackwatch
47 Food and Drug Administration
38 Orthomolecular medicine
35 Health freedom movement
33 Steven Milloy
30 Abortion-breast cancer hypothesis
28 Depo-Provera
28 AIDS
25 Harvey Bialy
23 Stephen Barrett
20 Cancer
17 Matthias Rath
17 Poppers
Category talk:
2 AIDS dissidents
Image:
2 Azt crystal.JPG
Image talk:
7 Hiv-timecourse.png
User:
59 MastCell
15 MastCell/To-do list
7 MastCell/sandbox
3 Ilena
2 68.35.72.13
2 NavyChaps
2 Girondin
2 Peter M Dodge/Archives/archivefeb012006
2 USMC Padre
2 MastCell/monobook.js
2 Chapscomdermiddleguardpadre
User talk:
98 MastCell
24 Ilena
13 Dr.michael.benjamin
10 Minderbinder
10 Trezatium
8 Severa
8 Jfdwolff
8 Cindery
5 JzG
5 Davidruben
5 Raymond arritt
4 Durova
4 MastCell/Archive 1
4 Wouterstomp
4 Rustavo
Wikipedia:
105 Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
52 Requests for arbitration/Barrett v. Rosenthal/Workshop
18 Peer review/Cholangiocarcinoma
13 Requests for arbitration/Paranormal/Workshop
13 Sarcasm is really helpful
11 Featured article candidates/Cholangiocarcinoma
10 Requests for arbitration
9 Articles for deletion/No-Grain Diet (second nomination)
9 Articles for deletion/Hiram Caton
9 Administrator intervention against vandalism
8 Articles for deletion/Shattered Consensus: The True State of Global Warming
8 Articles for deletion/George Vithoulkas (Second nomination)
7 Articles for deletion/Mucoid plaque (second nomination)
7 Personal attack intervention noticeboard
6 Articles for deletion/Frequency of autism
Wikipedia talk:
31 WikiProject Clinical medicine
12 Requests for arbitration/Barrett v. Rosenthal/Workshop
12 Requests for comment/Martinphi
12 Requests for arbitration/Barrett v. Rosenthal/Proposed decision
3 External links
2 Requests for checkuser
MastCell seeks to abuse power
First let me say I am a blocked user. I'm sure this will be deleted and Mastcell will probably come in and censor this but I am behooved to set the record straight on user MastCell. He should not be trusted. I am blocked user "user:Regulations." I was blocked in a blanket IP block. An administrative error was made. Many users were blocked with the claim that they were sockpuppets of user "user:Billy Ego." (The fact that they can't block me from making sockpuppets just goes to show that this IP is used for a wide geographic area for a major ISP, and that errors can easily be made. If they block this IP they block a whole area of the U.S.) Note that Billy Ego was a self-proclaimed "fascist." That's why he was blocked actually. I am a libertarian, which is the opposite. If you look at the other users that were blocked, there was no evidence of sockpuppetry other than their IP. In fact one was even an an anarcho-capitalist; his username was "user:Anarcho-capitalism" who even received awards for his or her editing. Now, MastCell knows good and well the I am not this "Billy Ego" character because he knows from the articles that he's been involved in are the same one's I've been involved in and knows that I am a libertarian, not a fascist. MastCell knows that an administrative error was made. But, when I make a sockpuppet to resume editing and he finds it, he gets the sockpuppet blocked. Of course, this is simple mindless administrative duties that an adminstrator ordinarily would not be criticized for. But, the fact that I knows I am not BillyEgo shows the lack of ethics on his part. If he had any real ETHICS he would ignore a sockpuppet of me, because he knows I am not a sockpuppet of BillyEgo. He is using this administrative error to prevent me from providing NPOV, information, and balance to medical articles. MastCell is well-known to be against heath freedom. He believes in draconian regulation and restrictions on what people may purchase and one what they may sell. He doesn't care or doesnt understand that at some point of increasing regulation it begins causing more harm than good. He tries his best to push his pro regulation POV in medical articles. (Maybe he works for the FDA). He knows I am for health freedom. And he knows that I source my edits and provide important information and balance to articles. He knows that I don't POV push but merely provide sourced information. His sole motive is to censor the other side. Make no mistake. The reason that he is seeking adminiship is because of me and others like me. He wants to be able to claim anyone that seems to represent a pro-freedom viewpoint is a sockpuppet of Billy Ego or me, Regulations, and then block them, without even a Checkuser. He is seeking adminship for the sole purpose of being able to block people without a Checkuser. MastCell should be not an adminstrator. He is abusive and unethical, and will be even more so if he is given any power. Reguboard 19:57, 9 May 2007 (UTC)