Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Borges

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 04:24, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Borges

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite the appearance of being well-sourced to articles in The New York Times, sources used are actually just brief mentions, quotes, op-eds, or do not even mention Borges. Article reads like a vanity, author your own legacy page with link-bait to his social media profiles. CorporateM (Talk) 03:39, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I zoomed in on the poorly formatted New York Times references. Admittedly, all the references are poorly formatted. I found two references consisting of one sentence quotes as a spokesman for something, devoid of discussion of him as a person. One mentioned him in passing in a list of otherwise non-notable people. One didn't mention him at all. I used Google to search for significant coverage anywhere, and came up dry. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:54, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:40, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:40, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:40, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:40, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:29, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deadbeef 03:57, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.