User talk:Vinnylospo

I want to take.

Hello, Vinnylospo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
• Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 06:32, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adding references is how we ensure that content is valid. Without references, a reader can not easily validate information and there is no presumption of accuracy. See Help:Referencing for beginners and Help:footnotes. This is covered by the Wikipedia policy of wp:verifiability (WP:V). Please wp:cite your edits with wp:reliable sources (RS). Per WP:V unsourced content can be removed.

Regarding images, see wp:Images for tips, tricks, and tutorials.

The documentation for the wp:template and wp:infobox should be available on {{Infobox sports rivalry}} If you want to find examples, from that page, in the far-left column of the page click on Tools/What links here. You should see a list of articles where it is used. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:32, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You had closed the {{unbulleted list}}, with two curly braces: "}}", but had not closed the infobox itself. I closed it. Also, you have two parameters which are not in {{Infobox sports rivalry}}:

• | all-time = GB: leads 18-17
• | regular season = GB: leads 14-13

I wp:commented both out (with <!-- hidden comment -->. If you use wp:preview, you would see some template error messages. Show preview can be helpful in preventing mistakes being saved and minimize server overhead. i.e. less information stored on the server. You can see my edit here. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:44, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am not always available. You might get a faster response at the wp:teahouse. Jim1138 (talk) 06:44, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Are generally not copyrightable in the US. See [[wp::Logos#Copyright-free logos]] Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:55, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Donkey Kong (SSB) Amiibo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 23:50, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mario (SSB) Amiibo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 23:51, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vinnylospo. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 15:36, 15 June 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Hello, Vinnylospo. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by PrimeHunter (talk) 09:56, 19 June 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Hi there,

Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! You may have seen notifications that I reverted some of your edits. This is because, while the subjects you added may or may not be associated with the alt-right, we need to explicitly make that connection in their articles (based on citations of reliable sources) before adding them to such a template. Even if it's obvious to everyone that the sorts of positions a person/magazine/whatnot takes are also positions of the alt-right, Wikipedia needs to base claims (especially claims that may be contentious) on reliable sources first. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 23:42, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vinnylospo. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 00:39, 28 June 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Hi Vinnylospo! You created a thread called How do I unbold text? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Delivered by Tigraan-testbot, an automated account. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Tigraan-testbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. This functionality is currently being tested. If you received this notification by error, please notify the bot's maintainer.

Hi, Vinnylospo. You are cordially invited to join WikiProject National Football League, a project dedicated to improving articles in relation to the National Football League. Please visit the project's talk page to see what areas/topics need help and to discuss any questions you may have. Thank you! WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 20:11, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2016 2nd All-Pro Team has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:48, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How did you find Morten Andersen's hall of fame ID. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 01:54, 7 August 2017 (UTC) I was typing numbers at random honestly. I don't even know any of the ID numbers[reply]

Thanks, we were having a discussion at here about it. Feel free to give your input. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 03:10, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you see the map showing where Trump visited? No one answered your question and I don't know how this works, but if I knew where the map was, I might be able to come up with some answers.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:20, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I knew I had seen some information about Trump's visits. You received an answer here and unless you can do what was suggested, the map will not be changed.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:23, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 662#Trump trips has a more detailed response. I had not seen it earlier this week. This makes more sense than what you were talking about earlier, so I suppose the result you want could happen if there was consensus for your view.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:17, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sonic Forces. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. It is unhelpful to add POV commentary into a Wikipedia article. BruzerFox 23:50, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your addition of Clay Travis to the Template:Alt-right footer, as per ongoing discussions on the talk page, inclusion of people should only be done when they have extensive, intimately documented ties to the (loosely defined) alt-right, not merely "ties" or narrow interaction. WP:BLP issues also arise. --Animalparty! (talk) 22:08, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vinnylospo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Marsden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Production (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Bagumba. Your recent edit to the page Jeremy Lin‎‎ appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 09:56, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I wanted to explain why I reverted an edit you made to The Girl in the Spider's Web (film). The problem was that you didn't include a source for the addition of a production company to the infobox. Right now, we have a citation there to Variety Insight, Variety magazine's film database. Sometimes companies are listed on promotional material, such as posters or trailers, and it's not immediately obvious what role they may have had – financial investment, production, distribution, or maybe they're just a rights-holder. This is why we use citations to reliable sources to determine who the production companies are. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:35, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vinnylospo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Vinnylospo

Decline reason:

That's not an IP. SQL^{Query me!} 04:39, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Vinnylospo (talk) 01:13, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What is the message that appears when you attempt to edit? —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 04:48, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vinnylospo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Green Bay Packers Wordmark.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 18:53, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sonic the Hedgehog (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tim Miller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kemba Walker, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. And it can't be done until after the July moratorium passes anyways. Thanks. —Bagumba (talk) 00:43, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. This is a message to inform you that a number of your edits concerning an actor's character in Sonic the Hedgehog (film) have been reverted for failing to heed a small detail - according to the film's official credits, the character's name is not denoted as you had put it down. There is already mention of this on the relevant article's Talk Page, stating this. Please be careful not to use official details on characters from a known franchise, if the media format they are being portrayed in does not use such details. GUtt01 (talk) 09:08, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sonic the Hedgehog (film), without heeding evidence regarding the subject of the article - not heeding this and adding in something that is not true can be construed as conducting either bad-faith edits, vandalism, or disruptive editing. GUtt01 (talk) 07:35, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Aaron Lynch (American football), you may be blocked from editing. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:29, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joe Klecko, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drew Pearson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

FDW777 (talk) 07:14, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Should you continue to amend the death toll at George Floyd protests without providing adequate references, as you have done at 04:39, 31 May 2020, 18:02, 2 June 2020, 04:01, 15 June 2020, 17:05, 17 June 2020, 02:36, 23 June 2020, 02:36, 23 June 2020, 19:51, 26 August 2020, and 23:57, 31 August 2020, I will be requesting discretionary sanctions to be applied. Please read WP:V, specifically the sections at WP:BURDEN and WP:CIRCULAR. Thank you. FDW777 (talk) 07:27, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Lacks any references or sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Vinnylospo/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Vinnylospo/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:40, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by IVORK was:

Still lacks any sources as pointed out by Dan arndt 21 days ago.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Vinnylospo/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Vinnylospo/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— IVORK _Talk 02:09, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please do not resubmit without addressing the issues raised. Doing so may lead to the draft being rejected (rather than declined for improvement) or even render it liable to deletion altogether.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Vinnylospo/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Vinnylospo/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 20:48, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Spitting Image 2020 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. ZimZalaBim ^talk 03:54, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I just wanted to notify you that you shouldn't link pages to drafts, such as Draft:Saturday Night Live parodies of Gerald Ford. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 15:38, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of NBA playoff series into List of WNBA playoff series. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 14:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Blair is mentioned once, in passing, in the Spitting Image article. Gordon Brown is not mentioned at all. So why do you think their templates should appear on the article? --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 15:12, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Please read through the WP:NAVBOX guidelines. Thanks. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 14:40, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Facu-el Millo. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Peter Parker (Marvel Cinematic Universe), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. El Millo (talk) 05:01, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mario Kart. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. A list of characters has been discussed on and off many times in the past several years. The current consensus is that the table falls under WP:GAMECRUFT. If you have a compelling reason to bring it back, please first bring it up on the article talk page. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 07:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Curbon7 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Curbon7 (talk) 07:37, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a clear fail of character notability standards, reception is cherry-picked from trivial mentions of the character. It would be better if there was more discussion about his role in the actual game he starred in than his cameo in another game.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lucas (Mother 3) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lucas (Mother 3), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 09:31, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cowboys–Packers rivalry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is nothing here to suggest an actual rivalry between these two teams. The fact that they are both teams in the NFL, even in the same conference, means they are bound to play each other on a semi-regular basis, but a rivalry needs some true enmity between the two teams, and none has been demonstrated here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UW Dawgs (talk) 17:49, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, History of organizational changes in the NBA, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 00:34, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:History of organizational changes in the NBA, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:History of organizational changes in the NBA and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:History of organizational changes in the NBA during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. – Sabbatino (talk) 11:42, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2021 US Capitol Storming has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mgasparin (talk) 07:08, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 All-Pro Team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punter.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 21:42, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 22:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Morshu, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morshu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I am not convinced this is a notable spinoff as the reception is largely based on listicles and trivial mentions, not substantive coverage. So far it seems like an article that would be better off in FANDOM.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Metal Sonic and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Metal Sonic, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 08:27, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Big Chungus, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sdrqaz (talk) 22:28, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Football League 2010s All-Decade Team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fullback.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Taylor Jenkins. – Sabbatino (talk) 19:57, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of WNBA playoff series is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of NBA playoff series until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

– Sabbatino (talk) 13:09, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chet Mutryn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AAFC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:55, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vinnylospo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pro Football Focus All-Pro Team, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:10, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vinnylospo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pro Football Focus All-Pro Team".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:59, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Otho Davis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elgin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Spitting Image (2020) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ralph Hay Pioneer Award, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph Hay Pioneer Award until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Mug Root Beer, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please don't include any inappropriate categories. Thank you. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 16:40, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]