You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for block evasion. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Bishonen | talk 16:59, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Sheriff John Brown always hated me - for what, I'll never know

Every time I plant a seed he'd say 'Kill it, before it grow'

He'd say 'Kill them before they grow..."

The life and techniques of paid trolls

Happy Halloween!

---

Hello Til Eulenspiegel:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
    – JudeccaXIII (talk) 19:08, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Even though you are blocked, I appreciate not just your support to help build up Wikipedia, but standing your ground in defense involving controversial edits & subjects -- Thnx & Cheers -- JudeccaXIII (talk) 19:11, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, it's always nice to be remembered...! Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 20:14, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015 !!!

Hello Til Eulenspiegel, May you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New year 2015. Happy editing, JudeccaXIII (talk) 22:36, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Yes, I'm sending you another happy holidays cheer, LOL Cheers! — JudeccaXIII (talk) 22:36, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am writing this here to PROTEST the blatant, hypocritical, two faced policy of User:Bishonen and most of the other admins here who have made a total sham out of wikipedia's NPOV policy for their own personal agendas.

Whenever any militant anti-Christian editor shows up spouting insults, invective and blasphemy at the Christian faith and fellow editors who are of the Christian faith, it seems the militant editor is magically protected by the establishment here no matter what he says or does.

But let any editor wince, blink, or say "boo" back to the militant anti-Christian editor and guess who gets immediately perma-banned? That's right, the one who responds to the magically protected militant anti-Christian editor.

I found this out the hard way several times - the militant anti-Christian editors here are definitely held to a much LOWER standard, and anyone responding to them is held to a much more rigid HIGHER STANDARD, where anything they say can and will be used against them.

In final conclusion, I think the rest of the world is well aware by now that en.wikipedia has become an overrated travesty, administratively controlled by special interest groups who represent about only 1.7% of the world's elite; and the formerly successful NPOV policy is now a meaningless joke, as is User:Jimbo Wales original vision of having an encyclopedia written by and for the average person. Soviet-style intolerance for any dissent has become Wikipedia's most recognizable trademark, so much so that I have no expectation my thoughts will even be permitted to remain visible here.

For my part, whenever I get a chance I will do my best to inform people, in person or using social media, about my experiences with English wikipedia. It's not like English wikipedia doesn't already have the reputation it deserves with most people, but reputations do spread in mysterious ways as a result of your attitude and your actions.

Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 03:17, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well smart phones are so cheap People everywhere all over the world can get enough together to get one and They generate more and more wiki-traffic too Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 01:01, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you might be interested in the discussion at User talk:Jimmy Wales#Potential WMF collaborations?, and might even maybe be in a position to know some entities which might be able and/or interested in perhaps funding some translations into English or one of the other major UN languages of some of the exclusively Ethiopian biblical texts, and, maybe, perhaps later, any other classic texts of Ethiopian or African literature. John Carter (talk) 20:35, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes User:John Carter, I have translated and published Ethiopian Biblical texts but cannot participate there unless you can get me unblocked! Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 00:33, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an admin anymore and cannot see how I can get anyone unblocked, unfortunately. But, if you know of any officials in the EOC who might know someone who can provide funding for such translations, that would be very useful. Also, I think, if you wanted to place the translations on Wikisource, maybe with the original texts as well (which I doubt I will be able to read myself) that might get us a bit closer to that. I actually have started a rather disgustingly long list of some of the sources I would love to see added to wikisource at wikisource:User:John Carter, including all the texts of the variant forms of the Bible. If you had any interest in helping there, I don't think the block here would necessarily extend there. Maybe. Like I said, I'm not an admin any longer and that makes it harder for me to check such. John Carter (talk) 00:43, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

oh, my English translations of Meqabyan I, II, III are commercially available and not available for wikisource... Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 01:05, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know of anyone else but me nowadays who has published and can do this sort of translation. But if you ever run across someone willing to pay for it, you need to let ME know! since it would be me doing the workTil Eulenspiegel /talk/ 13:31, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please restore my own talkpage access. User Beetsra has taken it upon himself to revoke it.

Like most wikipedia actions, this decision to muzzle with censorship yet again was apparently made without any semblance of due process, at the mere whim of a self-entitled individual, trigger happy with his toolbox, as it were "behind closed doors" that are not open to any accountability.

I do not and never will understand the reason I was blocked from contributing to wikipedia in the first place,it was a purely spiteful political act done by enemies and not for any legitimate reason. It was in protest of these dirty actions by wikipedia administration that I was banned. The only long term result is that bullheaded, self aggrandizing wikipedia admins while driving away knowledgable contributors, have only made more serious long term enemies for themselves, since exposing their already shady reputation and blatantly reckless fudging of known facts is mere childsplay with modern technology. Editing any wikipedia article at any time i wish without your detecting it with any number of alternate accounts as I continue to do regularly is also childsplay 71.246.145.202 (talk) 12:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Hey Til, while you're at it with your Yankee IPs (you know me--I kick it below the Mason-Dixon line), maybe you can go do something useful, like expand and improve Timothy Gabriel. Drmies (talk) 00:18, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am sure more are probably misidentified as me than are actually mine, but I promise if you unblock me I will diligently research whatever article you want Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 00:46, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Til Eulenspiegel. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I received this email starting out "Hello Til, I am sorry to see you blocked. You are one of the most neutral user on WP. Anyway...I need your help regarding[...]" To the person who sent this, unfortunately there is nothing I can do now on this wikipedia but edit this talkpage since I am completely blocked here, so I don't see what I can do to help. Regards, Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 22:10, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]