User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 40: Difference between revisions

This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Wondering why your article was speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Do you want to move a page that I've move-protected? Discuss the move first on the article's talk page. If there's a consensus for the move, let me know and I'll unlock the page.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).

Hey I just editted the Zoosa page to remove the unambiguous advertisement aspect. Please let me know if this works. thanks! --CSRwiki (talk) 22:06, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FocusMT India Pvt. Ltd.

Hi there I am just trying to create a page with information about the company I work in. FocusMT is a Nuance undertaking company and I do not need to advertise it. I have not put any content with advertizement in it. Reconsider the choice of deleting my article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amitpd (talk • contribs) 20:56, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!!! I'm trying to create a "wikiproject" for University so that I've wrote a page in Spanish (the one about "Aula de teatro de la UAM") and I've tried to translated it into English but now the English page is deleted and I do not know how can I fix it. Can you help me,please?? I need to finish that project. Thank you very much for your help. Bye!!--Tmj english (talk) 18:16, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NawlinWiki,

please explain me the reasons for deleating DJTUNES Page from wikipedia. Thank you in advance! Regards

• The article did not indicate that the site was notable per WP:WEB, as established by reliable independent sources per WP:CORP. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:48, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i am unsure of what privileges the title of administrator provides, but whether you are aware or not i am new to membership and contribution to wikipedia. constructive criticism would be much more effective than the 'speedy deletion' i encountered how discouraging that i contribute to a such a great source of knowledge only to be rebuked not only with the article i wrote, but insulted with an impersonal message about so called abuse upon members. i expect you will laugh about me amongst the elite few as a NooB, forever disheartened by this robotic warning of abuse; im sure i will not be contributing to the so called free encyclopedia restricted by what seems to me petty squabbling over the validity of entries, by your user page alone i see i am not the first to be discouraged..

—Preceding unsigned comment added by DaviesJake (talk • contribs) 05:04, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.metro.co.uk/weird/article.html?This_man_is_taking_over_our_dreams..._but_who_is_he?&in_article_id=758887&in_page_id=2 —Preceding unsigned comment added by DaviesJake (talk • contribs) 05:11, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello NawlinWiki, I read and understood the notables you referred. It is my first article on wikipedia, and I would appreciate if you would be more specific in your comments (what exactly led you to delete the article). I will rewrite the article and try my best to follow the notables. Please let me hear your feedback. Regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by Otvertka (talk • contribs) 15:40, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NawlinWiki

Can you reassess your decision to delete the John Honney page please? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chappers1873 (talk • contribs) 15:52, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• No, it's a shout-out page about a nonnotable person, with content like "John is renowned for his bonhomie, joie-de-vivre and excellent Scouse accent." If we allowed pages like that, even for a short while, they would overwhelm the encyclopedia. Please see WP:BIO, WP:V, and WP:NOT. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:33, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is pertaining to the artical o RObert Perrier This biography is of a youth that was troubled by bad influences in his area and made choices that were not the best but he ultimately made something of himself joining the coast guard and becoming a second class petty officer within his first years after joining he became a recruiter for the coast guard using the same methods and tecniques he used to recruit in his gangs but he now takes induvisials that are looking for something more and gets them off of the street i published this artical before i finished it so that MR. perrier could see the begining and understand my key focas in his page if you let e finish the artical you will not be disappointed the end product wil be done by friday of this week —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trusum (talk • contribs) 16:49, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's also a copyvio of this. HalfShadow (talk) 16:57, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

Please could you tell me why the above was delete? I read the guidlines and I believe I have adhered to them. I have also added a COI to the user page The facts are unbiased

The cetegory was correct

Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcus482004 (talk • contribs) 23:37, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a bunch for helping over at NewPage patrolling; you delete the articles before I have a chance to tag them. Cheers! ~SpK 16:59, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See User talk:Theantinawlin. Something is fishy. Triplestop x3 23:45, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think the last 4 vandals may be the same person on this talk page... A8UDI 01:54, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They're not socks. It's just /b/ from 4chan attacking his talk page. Both Nawlin and User:Jéské_Couriano are targets for vandalism from this group. Until It Sleeps ^{Talk • Contribs} 02:05, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad they have such high priorities in life. A8UDI 02:10, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, what's with all the people out to get you, if you don't mind my asking? I've just started newpage patrolling and already seen it twice...--fetchcomms 04:02, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There was a post on /b/ about it.Some user on /b/ asked them to click on random page replace the content of the page with something about nalin --NotedGrant Talk 07:24, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NawlinWiki,

Can you please reassess your decision to delete this page. I am in the process of creating the page so have not yet had the opportunity to include all the information/links as to why the company is notable. This is one of the oldest privately-held multiple language translation companies in the country, is considered a notable milestone in the Norwegian-American community and has been recognized by organizations like Inc. magazine, the Women Presidents Organization and the Ford Foundation for its business practices and achievements. I was actually creating the page on one of my subpages, but wanted to see if the logo would appear properly. If you need me to wait until I have everything completed before you reinstate it, I can alert you to my user subpage later today. Thanks for your consideration.--FatWolf (talk) 18:19, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• It would be better if you finished your work in your userspace, making sure to add reliable sources that show the company's notability per WP:CORP. Let me know if you'd like me to look at it later. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:22, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Will do. Thanks, FatWolf (talk) 18:53, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, you got this crap before I got to it. Bearian (talk) 21:13, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the autoblock from your block of Theantinawlinsbuddy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) as it was affecting at least one other regular editor. Fred Talk 23:23, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nawlin,

I am sending you a message regarding speedy deletion of the article "Sabre Durlston" which is relevant due to script writing and producing in the uk.

Sabre Durlston is a real person and if it is possible whould i be able to continue with this article and add to it whenever i feel its needed.

Thank you for reading keep well AJ BRILL.

Hello Nawlin,

The page about Stantum has been deleted (I don't know what its content was) late july. I am working for this company and would like to create it again. Since I can't access to the deleted content, could you give me more input about why the notability wasn't proved enough to keep it?

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MultitouchGuy (talk • contribs) 18:38, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• The article that was deleted in July was two sentences long and basically said, "This is a company located in ____ that makes ____." It cited only to the company's website. Any reposted article should show, by citing reliable independent sources per WP:V, that the company meets the notability standards of WP:CORP. Also, given that you're working for the company, please read WP:COI. NawlinWiki (talk) 23:14, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

seems quite faggy if you ask me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kromaz0me (talk • contribs) 02:54, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the block I just laid on you (and removed). There's a bug when blocking someone, and it's important to not do it on a page with a diff from another user. I'll invoke WP:BELLY for not remembering about it. tedder (talk) 07:31, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was a good block :))--NotedGrant Talk 07:40, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not nearly as good as when I blocked Cluebot. Twice. tedder (talk) 07:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lol that's awesome Blocking cluebot (twice)--NotedGrant Talk 07:44, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NawlinWiki, I just wanted to inform you of my recent activity regarding the Grainger Games article. This is an article I created under an alternate account (approved by ArbCom) for the purpose of participating in the newbie treatment experiment, as described at WP:NEWT. We had some brief interaction following the initial deletion of the page, so I feel it is only fair to inform you of this, and invite you to add your comments to the discussion, if you so wish. All the best, AJCham 20:12, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nawlin Wiki, we've had some back and forth with an article I created. I made additional revisions and would like your feedback. Please visit my Sandbox Pageand leave your feedback there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Michellecatin (talk • contribs) 22:37, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WHY DID YOU DELETE MY PAGE - "DEMONIC RESURRECTION"??????????????--Bdwolverine87 (talk) 15:26, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Because it didn't assert that this band was notable per the guidelines at WP:BAND, or cite reliable independent sources (WP:V) to show same. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:28, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Contributions/70.137.19.153 What's going on with the blocking and unblocking? Enigma^msg 03:06, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Sorry, it got caught in a bunch of IP attacks on the article it was editing. NawlinWiki (talk) 03:07, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You just blocked this user in response to my AIV request - thanks! He's done a lot of damage (mostly page moves) that I'm having trouble reverting. Can you give it a shot? --SquidSK ^(1MC•log) 04:07, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Taken care of, thanks. NawlinWiki (talk) 04:11, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There's also this IP, which followed through and placed the {{pp-move}} template on every page that SGF vandalized. I've never really been sure whether SGF's IP's can be blocked or not, given that he seems to use shared ones ... but these edits happened at 8 am in the morning, so I'm guessing it's probably his house, and not likely a shared IP. -- Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 13:21, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note that most edits since May 2009 from the range 65.92.124.* in general are also SGF, but not all of them, so I wouldn't be sure about recommending a rangeblock (I think that there was a rangeblock at one time, but it was allowed to expire in the hopes that SGF would get bored, which obviously hasnt happened). -- Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 13:40, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to disturb you, but can you please block the address above? The vandal using this address has continued inserting misinformation after final warning. Thanks. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs

Nevermind. The vandal has now been blocked. BTW, just asking: can you do rangeblocks? - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 04:33, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SadnapTae Cultmaster (talk) 16:35, 9 November 2009 (UTC)Ya i knew my page shouldn't be there but i didnt know if there was like a sandbox or something thanks[reply]

I agree that my TaskConnect page (speedily deleted on 29 October 2009) was not written as encyclopedia article and I apologize for publishing it. The article was my first on wikipedia and I was not aware of some rules ...

Is there a way to create such article and mark it as "stub" or "proof of concept" or something like that? Or should I prepare the content somewhere else and post it to wikipedia when I consider it complete and right according to the rules?

If I understand everything correctly, there is no need to "reserve" the name of the article because when someone else writes something bad (I mean something which is not true) about our product or company, it will definitely break some rules and therefore I can make a complaint about it.

Last thing - can you please send me the text of the deleted article or paste it to my talk page? The deletion was very fast and because I have written the text as proof of concept, I have no backup of it.

Please answer on my talk page or here in this section, thanks. Jakub Marsik (talk) 21:57, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• You can create a draft article in your userspace, say, at User:Jmarsik/TaskConnect. I will move the last article that you posted to that title. I will caution you that in addition to being promotional, the last version did not show how this software was notable per WP:N, and didn't cite any sources to show its notability per WP:V; given that the software is not yet publicly available, I'm not sure that you could meet those standards at this time. And you are correct, you don't have to "reserve" Wikipedia titles. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:14, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• You are really fast, that's something I really appreciate! :) Thanks for recovering the text. And you are right, I'm not able to create standards-conforming version of the text at this time, because the product is not yet publicly available. I will wait until there will be some sources available to cite. Jakub Marsik (talk) 22:33, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear NawlinWiki, in regards to this edit, I thought all the voters agreed with me! Implausible redirect! Yet you disagree! I'll see you at DRV. ;) (Thanks for closing this quickly.) Drmies (talk) 21:42, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy NawlinWiki,

Please help me understand the reasons for deleting the Shock of Pleasure Page from Wikipedia. I am the group's manager and anything we submit comes directly from the source. Executive Music Group (EMG) has SOP information on their site that we furnished to them.

Thank you for your time.

Regards--Romeo18 (talk) 16:08, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• The version I deleted was written like a straight advertisement or PR release. See WP:SPAM. The current article is better. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:10, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Someone (24.34.14.162) vandalized the Kurt Schmidt article by writing some not-so-nice things about you (I assume). I reverted the edits. Pdcook (talk) 19:06, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks! NawlinWiki (talk) 19:49, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hold on, if you google do a saku, you get 9 restults excluding the wiki article, and you can clearly see it being used. I feel offended for you to say im wasting your time, and if you have read the book that i used as my source you would very well know that i am not lying!!!!!! Innocent until proven guilty!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Murtazahh (talk • contribs) 21:27, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Yep, and none of them (except your Wikipedia article) reflect the definition you gave. Wikipedia follows WP:V, not "innocent until proven guilty." NawlinWiki (talk) 21:40, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

fine do what you want. but the day you read the book in my source, please feel like an idiot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Murtazahh (talk • contribs) 07:31, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey just wondering why the nemacyst article was deleted before it was even published, i admit it was unfinished, but the article didnt even have a chance to start up —Preceding unsigned comment added by Levi2347 (talk • contribs) 03:52, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have plan to add info about all medicines in the market. I started with this article. I don't have any connection with any company that manufactures this. If I commit that I don't have any connection with any medicine manufacturing companies, am I eligible to add articles in this area? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arkrishna (talk • contribs) 10:52, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia is not a mere directory of products. You would need to show that a given product is notable (see WP:N) by citing reliable independent sources per WP:V. NawlinWiki (talk) 13:15, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think this user is one of those admins pretending to be a newbie, or just trolling? I feel like I should respond, but I'm not entirely sure how... MirrorLockup (talk) 20:35, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• I think it's a non-admin (i.e., vandal) pretending to be a newbie. But we should play this one by the book, regardless. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:35, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Any chance we could break out the salt this time around? --Bfigura ^(talk) 16:55, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you're around, could you go ahead and use your speedy axe on John Greaves? This is a pretty blatant hoax BLP, and the author keeps removing the CSD and AfD tags. Thanks! --SquidSK ^(1MC•log) 19:38, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SquidSK means Josh Greaves :-) --Pontificalibus (talk) 19:56, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain the reasons for the deletion of the Joker Blogs article? (No link, as it no longer exists) It was my first article, and any suggestions for improvements for the future would be extremely helpful. Thanks, Hpsparrow (talk) 21:39, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• The article was deleted because it did not assert that this webcontent was notable per WP:WEB, as shown by reliable independent sources per WP:V. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:41, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted this article. I'm going to re-create it since I think it's notable. So I'm asking if I could get a copy of the deleted article from you. Thanks.--Everyone Dies In the End (talk) 04:19, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am currently wriiting requested articles from Wikipedia:WikiProject Colorado. One in paticular I am really fuzzy about it's notability. The Imperial Hotel located in Cripple creek is a Casino but other then being one of the very few casions in Colorado nothing is notable that I am aware of. Can you please guide me to a decision as to whether to expend the effort on this article. Thank you for the help. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 12:12, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• I would wait until you find something that indicates that it has notability beyond being a casino. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 12:21, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No sir thank you for confirming my instincts. I appreciate the help! Hell In A Bucket (talk) 12:22, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This band is very notable because there are only two band in the world that plays the songs of the Australian band Midnight Oil. This band is from Hungary and many of the Australian fans appreciated their origins. Please let me know what was your main reason to delete the article about the band. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skyminers (talk • contribs) 14:26, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Your opinion that the band is unique or noteworthy isn't enough. You would need to show that the band meets the notability standards of WP:MUSIC, as shown by reliable independent sources per WP:V. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:31, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the support. ttonyb (talk) 03:36, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you modify Abuse Filter 260? --Shattered Mirror (talk) 14:59, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wish there were more admins like you. JBsupreme (talk) 05:09, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Don't know what brought that on, but thanks! NawlinWiki (talk) 05:10, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

did the hangon mean anything at all?

the band is relevant. pitchfork can't stop raving about them.

please explain? thanks.. Barleycorn (talk) 05:37, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• On reflection, the Pitchfork citation is enough to avoid *speedy* deletion, so I've restored the article. If you can't find more sources, though, I wouldn't be surprised if someone lists it at WP:AFD. I must say that the talk page comment "they're a great new band, just give them a chance" wasn't helpful -- that argument is made for just about all of the dozens of nonnotable bands whose articles get deleted every day. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:47, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nawlin, I coming back to you to find some help. As stated in the COI rules, I asked for help within the talk section of the removed "Stantum" page, but it has been automatically deleted since the corresponding page does not exhists. I was providing facts and references about the company to help anyone who would be willing to write about it. It's a chicken and egg dilemna! How can I achieve contributing assuming the COI rules if I cannot use the talk pages? Any help or redirect to a group of users would be appreciated. Thanks.

MultitouchGuy (talk) 14:57, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NawlinWiki, I would like to know why my wikipedia article was taken down. It is not dissimilar from other articles such as Greencine and yet that page still stands? It contained neutral information about the company. Please tell me why exactly it was taken down so I can fix it! Thanks!

Britters006 —Preceding undated comment added 21:23, 16 November 2009 (UTC).[reply]

• The article doesn't indicate that the company meets the notability standards of WP:CORP, and does not cite reliable independent sources (per WP:V) to show notability. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:25, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I had to chuckle because, as I was making a complex and semi-legalistic argument about the McGill drinking team at User talk:Szpejdman, possibly giving some louts the benefit of the doubt because I'm an alumnus, you just deleted it and I'm very sure, knowing your work, it was for all the right reasons. Just made me chuckle at how hard I work sometimes to take nonsense more seriously than it deserves. All the best, Accounting4Taste:talk 22:06, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is 水の男の子, Um, when you deleted my article about Boy Scout Troop 673, I hadn't finished it yet. Thank You, --水の男の子 (talk) 15:58, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Local Scout groups are very unlikely to meet the notability standards of WP:ORG. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:38, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re-created again. I suggest it be create-protected and User:Bethie1010 blocked.

A new account has also been created, User:Smithie1010, who went and made a similar page. I tagged them as socks. Could you take care of them? Thanks- A little insignificant ^{Giving thanks to all that is me} 18:29, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey come on, let me warn the vandals I catch!Cathardic (talk) 20:27, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to create a page of the company where I work in. I am trying to create a page of the company where I work in. U have deleted the page citing it as an advertizement. Please reconsider your opinion. check the website link I have provided. The company is a Nuance Undertaking so it does not need any advertisement. So please do not delete the content.

• Whether or not it "needs any advertisement", the article promotes the company. Furthermore, if you work at FocusMT, you should not be writing about it -- see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:46, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If writing about a company is considered as advertizement then why there is a section kept for Company information at all. Better remove that section. Because there are many pages with Company information in Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amitpd (talk • contribs) 21:08, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuance_Communications Check this out.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amitpd (talk • contribs) 21:16, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear NawlinWiki. You have deleted Cortney Tidwell page too many times to count. Last reason was for ADVERTISING or something like that. I don't understand this at all. I could care less about Cortney Tidwell's commercial success. I just want to add a notable musician to Wikipedia. I would tremendously appreciate if you could help me out. I am a wiki beginner. If there is any rewording that needs to be done to the article I'd understand that. I find artists on my favorite radio station and Wikipedia them. She is not in Wikipedia. So I learned some Wikipedia so I could add her. But you deleting my pages only discourages me. I don't know how YOU contact me, but I guess I'll try to create Cortney Tidwell page again. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ncerlan (talk • contribs) 20:54, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Cortney Tidwell and Cortney Tidwell (singer). Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Tim Song (talk) 21:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nawlin,

I had just created an article about a band called The Jolts, which was speedily deleted. I've since read through several of the guidelines and have come to the conclusion that the article, as written, may have not demonstrated that the band meets the criteria of notability. The band in question meets one or more of the criteria (such as #4 and 12), but I'm not sure as to how to work such information into the article. Could you, or another admin, give me a hand in correcting the article? Note that any similarities between the band's name and my own username are entirely coincidental (I'm not a member of the band). J0lt (talk) 07:52, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tips, I'll see what I can do! J0lt (talk) 13:03, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]