User talk:Gixce93: Difference between revisions

The Signpost 2024-09-04 Volume 20, Issue 12 News and notes: WikiCup enters final round, MCDC wraps up activities, 17-year-old hoax article unmasked In the media: AI is not playing games anymore. Is Wikipedia ready? Recent research: Simulated Wikipedia seen as less credible than ChatGPT and Alexa in experiment News from the WMF: Meet the 12 candidates running in the WMF Board of Trustees election Wikimania: A month after Wikimania 2024 Serendipity: What it's like to be Wikimedian of the Year Traffic report: After the gold rush Humour: Local man halfway through rude reply no longer able to recall why he hates other editor About · Subscribe · Newsroom

I only now saw your comment on the GA review for Anime. If you'd like to work on it and then re nominate it when you're done making the changes I requested, I will happily review it again.Lemurbaby (talk) 01:18, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. |>(@"<) (talk) 03:05, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Asteroids (video game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wired (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Asteroids (video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Indrian -- Indrian (talk) 01:20, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The first link you added as reference to the general 4X genre description seems to be broken. Do you think you could show it to me so that I could verify it some other way, or look for the archived version of it on Internet Archive? TeleComNasSprVen (talk • contribs) 08:28, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Asteroids (video game) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Asteroids (video game) for things which need to be addressed. Indrian (talk) 21:06, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed that you're in the middle of getting Asteroids to become a Good Article and hopefully beyond. Its good to see effort made towards articles based on arcade games and I hope you can continue and be part of the Video Game WikiProject. But if you don't mind offering a suggestion on another project, Sinistar has always been an interesting bird for me and its current condition is really sad. Just a thought if that's okay. GamerPro64 04:43, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Well, of course I've been thinking of improving plenty of articles about games like these, including arcade games, because there's the Golden age of video arcade games and the second generation of video game consoles, where a lot of the simple basics of video games got wide exposure and there was a number of innovations and inventions for the medium at that time. Atari was the basic form of a typical video game industry: They made games, developed games, published games, advertised games, got big, and earned money. Much of the stuff they made is simple and fun, even arcade games like Asteroids are that way. They also innovated things, like putting in vector graphics for Lunar Lander. Today, the medium is complex, while the industry is massive. The greatness of the early days of video games before the NES came is what made me focus on improving such articles. |>(@"<) (talk) 05:19, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Indeed, it's okay to improve Sinistar, and I can do it. |>(@"<) (talk) 05:24, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Asteroids (video game) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Asteroids (video game) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Indrian -- Indrian (talk) 21:02, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Breakout (video game) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ]'', and built by Steve Wozniak aided by [[Steve Jobs]]. The game was ported to video game console] and upgraded to video games such as ''Super Breakout''. In addition, ''Breakout'' was the basis

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:34, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Downward Spiral may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:40, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I have placed your FAR of Devil May Cry 3: Dante's Awakening on hold. FAR instructions require a notification of a potential FAR to be made on the talk page of the article prior to the review being started. I see that you have posted to the talk page, but you did not give interested editors the chance to respond before you started the FAR. Discussion should be continued on the talk page, and if the article does not see significant improvements over the next week or two, the review may be restarted at WP:FAR. Thanks, and please let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 15:45, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You need to wait more than a couple of hours. Editors have jobs, school, are in different time zones, are on vacation, etc. A wait of at least a week is necessary, two weeks is generous. Dana boomer (talk) 15:53, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I might help there - specially if you take a look at another of the pre-2008 FAs which I helped get a star, Metroid Prime - some concerns were raised before, and while not enough to fear a FAR, preventing is always a reasonable thing to do. igordebraga ≠ 00:16, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hope some more people appear to look at DMC - and that my GOCE request to clean Metroid Prime up is answered soon before it gets into the FAR... igordebraga ≠ 02:08, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your note - that appears to be an interesting discussion. Just remember that before articles can be taken to FAR they need to have a notification placed on the article talk page for a reasonable period of time (not just a few hours). Notifications at WP:VG or the sub-page listing pre-2008 FAs don't count, as there may be interested editors who don't watch those places. Not just saying this to you, but to everyone participating at that discussion. Dana boomer (talk) 14:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I saw this comment you made. It seems you and @Indrian: think he's a sock puppet. I was wondering if you could provide some reasons or "difs" that show this? Or if you had been to WP:SPI about it? I'd prefer to clear this up, and block him if he's a sockpuppet who's block evading or wrongfully using 2 accounts, or not be bringing it up if it looks like its not true. Please let me know what you know. Thanks! Sergecross73 msg me 18:18, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Let us discuss the changes at the Sega Saturn Talk Page. We may get in trouble if we continue to go back and forth. Although I do not think either of use is doing it intentionally, the rules still apply from what I read. I'll let you to change back to the old version for now while we discuss. John Mayor ERS (talk) 02:32, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I will change it back. John Mayor ERS (talk) 02:33, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This edit added an editor to a list of accounts that had been looked at by a CheckUser, and found to be "Possible - Editing via web hosting ranges". Since you are not a CheckUser, you have not seen CheckUser evidence, and are in no position to make that judgement. Putting the editor there ran the risk of misleading an administrator into thinking that you were a CheckUser and had found Checkuser evidence relating to that account. Fortunately, I checked and found that you are not a CheckUser, but there is no guarantee that an administrator would make such a check rather than taking the edit on trust. Please don't edit the section of any sockpuppet investigation page headed "Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments" unless and until you become a Clerk, CheckUser, or administrator. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:10, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am removing some of the formatting of this talk page, as it resulted in most of its content being hidden. Even if you know that there is other stuff there, and can read it, other editors may not be able to. While you are free to amuse yourself by adding irrelevant formatting such as colouring if you like doing such things, please bear in mind that the purpose of a talk page is for communication between editors, and anything that significantly interferes with that purpose is unhelpful. I have no idea which part of what I am removing caused the problem, nor do I propose to spend time finding out: narrowing the problem down to the relevant section of your formatting has already wasted enough of my time. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:51, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Downward Spiral, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Self-abuse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Gonna, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 02:56, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fix your signature so people can leave you messages on your Talk page, not somebody else's. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:09, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to avoid WP:ANI, please fix your signature. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:16, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:22, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature has to be legible letters or numbers, not cryptic symbols that can't be understood. Also, it is almost impossible to read your talk page with a dark red background. Was this your intention? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:38, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have made a mistake in the Q*bert article, so I reverted your last edit. You seem to believe Atari made Q*bert for some reason, I am afraid that is incorrect. Q*bert, like many other games of the time, were associated with Atari, mostly on their consoles, so I can understand your confusion. Atari did buy the rights to Q*bert some years later, and did release games like the 3D 1997 remake, so I can't fully blame you for thinking Atari made Q*bert. The real creators though were Gottlieb.

If I am not mistaken, Atari brought the franchise when Q*bert 3 came out. BustaBunny (talk) 22:37, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"I've considered changing Jak's block to a permanent site-ban because of the carnage he and his sockpuppets have done." I understand that you are obviously passionate about this matter, but what is the meaning behind comments like this? You are not an admin.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 02:48, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And just so you know, there really isn't much of a difference between "indefinite block" and "site ban". We already block him on sight, per WP:DUCK, similar to a ban, since he's so bad a block evading, the only real difference would be that we could rightfully revert every single edit he makes, without question. Considering most of his pages are protected, and his other edits are terrible and reverted, or just largely unanswered talk page musings, so we have most of that covered too. So that's why I say I think we're better off just being vigilant with watching over these pages, and keeping up with the protection/blocks. I don't think it worth dragging through the pits of ANI drama when it wouldn't give much of a return for our efforts.

Side note, you mentioned that Jak may have first started as an IP back as far as 2011. I wasn't aware of that one. Do you have a link to that one? Sergecross73 msg me 15:05, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Looking at the CD-i page, Jak-type edits first appeared in January 2011. Indrian (talk) 15:25, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Gonna,
You might want to copy the contents of User:Mr. Gonna/Header and User talk:Mr. Gonna/Archive and copy it to a User:Mr. Gonna Change My Name Forever User page. Then, request the page be deleted as there is no longer a Mr. Gonna User account. You can post {{Db-g7}} on the page or else I will nominate it for deletion at MfD. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can move the username part of the titles of those pages, then the redirects would be deleted. Mr*|(60nna) 23:51, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged both redirects for speedy deletion. Mr*|(60nna) 00:04, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Downward Spiral, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Control (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

• Discussions
• Wikiquote notability
  • Discussion relating to DBpedia
  • Discussion over Wikidata data
• Other Noteworthy Stuff
  • Summary: The summaries will now be sent out on Saturday as opposed to Friday.
• Did you know?
  • Newest properties: astronomical filter, National Archives specific records type ID, National Archives topical subject ID, National Archives geographic ID, National Archives organization ID, National Archives person ID, compressor type, Internet Broadway Database person ID, Internet Broadway Database show ID, Internet Broadway Database production ID, Internet Broadway Database venue ID, English Heritage list number, apparent magnitude
• Newest task forces: Heraldry task force
• Development
  • Reduced page load time significantly once again. Page load time was cut to roughly 2/3. For now we’re happy with the resulting page load times. We’ll start concentrating on other areas of the user interface now.
  • Fixed faulty selection handling when adding a property using the keyboard (bugzilla:62868)
  • Worked on fixing issues with handling of spaces in quantities (bugzilla:62567)
  • Fixed miscount of Wikidata changes on the client watchlist (bugzilla:45812)
  • Wrote new browser tests for special pages using the Cucumber and Selenium frameworks
  • Improved error formatting, localisation and handling. We will work on error message wording next to make them more understandable.
  • Worked on the code which propagates page moves from the clients into Wikidata as a preparation for allowing page deletions to appear on Wikidata
  • Made the Wikibase extension work with the new “Compact language links” Beta feature and a bit more independent from the UniversalLanguageSelector in general
  • The student team working on the entity suggester has finished the first version of it. The code is being reviewed now and is hopefully ready for deployment soon. Once it is deployed it will show you what new properties you could add to an item.
• Monthly Tasks
  • Fix a format or content violation for the original language (P364) property
  • Hack on one of these.
  • Help develop the next summary here!
  • Contribute to a Showcase item

Read the full report · Unsubscribe · John F. Lewis 19:05, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've been holding my tongue on this but it is just irritating to me. Can you stop liking all my comments I make whenever you're involved in a conversation? Its one thing to do that if you're thankful for the user for making useful edits, but why like something someone says in the comments? This is not Facebook. GamerPro64 23:17, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll reduce that. Mr*|(60nna) 23:19, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nine Inch Nails, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Fragile (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

• Discussions
  • Closed: Merge project chats
• Other Noteworthy Stuff
  • Wikidata Toolkit 0.1.0 released!
  • Wikidata development has been going on for two years!
  • Wikiquote gets Phase I on Tuesdays (April 8th)
• Did you know?
• Newest properties: JSTOR journal code, Openpolis ID, Philippine Standard Geographic Code ID
  • Newest task forces: France task force, US legislation task force
• Development
  • Property of an existing claim can no longer be changed through API with wbeditentity (bugzilla:62425)
  • UI for simple query SpecialPage (bugzilla:55593)
  • minor fixes in the UI
  • UI for claims on property pages
  • worked on review of property suggester (review)
  • still looking for a working student/intern
• Monthly Tasks
  • Fix a format or content violation for the original language (P364) property
  • Hack on one of these.
  • Help develop the next summary here!
  • Contribute to a Showcase item

Read the full report · Unsubscribe · John F. Lewis 23:42, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mr. Gonna Change My Name Forever/Sledgehammer, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mr. Gonna Change My Name Forever/Sledgehammer and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Mr. Gonna Change My Name Forever/Sledgehammer during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Orange Mike | Talk 20:30, 6 April 2014 (UTC) That page is a draft, not something else.[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.