Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Jump to content

User talk:MehmoodS: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Re
No edit summary
Line 53: Line 53:
:::{{u|GeneralNotability}}, vandalism is happening on pages that I prevented them from such as on [[Battle of Umberkhind]], [[Battle of Kolhapur]], [[Baji Prabhu Deshpande]], where IPs and new accounts are pushing honorifics into these pages. There is no one checking these pages and editors like Akshaypatill who are aware of this, are not taking any actions against such disruptions or warning editors of [[MOS:HON]] and then there are other pending change reviewers who have witnessed it, but just turn the blind eye. Please look at my contribution where I constantly warned and protected pages from such disruptions. Please do consider of unblocking me so that I can continue to improve encyclopedia and prevent its articles from being disrupted. [[User:MehmoodS|MehmoodS]] ([[User talk:MehmoodS#top|talk]]) 12:12, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
:::{{u|GeneralNotability}}, vandalism is happening on pages that I prevented them from such as on [[Battle of Umberkhind]], [[Battle of Kolhapur]], [[Baji Prabhu Deshpande]], where IPs and new accounts are pushing honorifics into these pages. There is no one checking these pages and editors like Akshaypatill who are aware of this, are not taking any actions against such disruptions or warning editors of [[MOS:HON]] and then there are other pending change reviewers who have witnessed it, but just turn the blind eye. Please look at my contribution where I constantly warned and protected pages from such disruptions. Please do consider of unblocking me so that I can continue to improve encyclopedia and prevent its articles from being disrupted. [[User:MehmoodS|MehmoodS]] ([[User talk:MehmoodS#top|talk]]) 12:12, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
*MehmoodS, with two admins looking at the CU data, I don't think you can come back easily from this (I also note your use of simultaneously in "not used any other account simultaneously"). My suggestion is that you fess up on all accounts you have ever used, simultaneously or not, declare which account you will continue to use going forward (that becomes your primary account), then find something else to do for a minimum of six months and see if you can convince someone to unblock you. I suggest you read [[WP:SOCKBLOCK]] carefully. --[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|comment]])</small> 16:12, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
*MehmoodS, with two admins looking at the CU data, I don't think you can come back easily from this (I also note your use of simultaneously in "not used any other account simultaneously"). My suggestion is that you fess up on all accounts you have ever used, simultaneously or not, declare which account you will continue to use going forward (that becomes your primary account), then find something else to do for a minimum of six months and see if you can convince someone to unblock you. I suggest you read [[WP:SOCKBLOCK]] carefully. --[[User:RegentsPark|RegentsPark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|comment]])</small> 16:12, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
:{{u|RegentsPark}} editors with two or more accounts simultaneously, is to mislead, deceive, vandalize or disrupt. I have followed sockpuppet policy and that is why only used one account. Since I have had this account, I haven't had any other account that I used simultaneously with this account and I don't know what CU data is of concern here. This is my one and only account that I have used in last 9 months and this the only account that I have been using and will continue with moving forward and this is my only primary account. When you say that find something else to do for 6 months, what exactly do you mean? Do you mean to step away for six months from Wikipedia and then re-request to unblock? But can't admins continue to investigate as I have digressed enough to look at my contribution and tell me if I have in any way caused any nuisance or disruption on Wikipedia. I just request to have my account unblocked. [[User:MehmoodS|MehmoodS]] ([[User talk:MehmoodS#top|talk]]) 17:02, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
:{{u|RegentsPark}} editors with two or more accounts simultaneously, is to mislead, deceive, vandalize or disrupt. A great example would be Suthasianhistorian8 who had about 7-8 accounts that he used simultaneously. I have followed sockpuppet policy and that is why only used one account. Since I have had this account, I haven't had any other account that I used simultaneously with this account and I don't know what CU data is of concern here. This is my one and only account that I have used in last 9 months and this the only account that I have been using and will continue with moving forward and this is my only primary account. When you say that find something else to do for 6 months, what exactly do you mean? Do you mean to step away for six months from Wikipedia and then re-request to unblock? But can't admins continue to investigate as I have digressed enough to look at my contribution and tell me if I have in any way caused any nuisance or disruption on Wikipedia. I just request to have my account unblocked. [[User:MehmoodS|MehmoodS]] ([[User talk:MehmoodS#top|talk]]) 17:02, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:06, 9 July 2022

You are not allowed to use large quotations in "quote=" parameter. It should not exceed more than 25 words in general. If you have questions reply here, not on my talk page. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 14:37, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aman.kumar.goel If that is the case, then the quotes can be shortened. You could have just notified but still needs to be verified if what you suggested is accurate. There was no need to revert. MehmoodS (talk) 14:41, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There was a clear need to revert. You are removing "Maratha victory" despite being warned not to remove it. It is staying there for years and you can't remove it without gaining consensus first. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 14:44, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Aman.kumar.goel There is no policy that states that something that has been there for years cannot be corrected. The information earlier had false quotes and I added the correct one which you reverted. Also its up to you and the previous user to reach concensus as there is discussion already in place that you haven't even taken consideration.MehmoodS (talk) 14:49, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You were not correcting anything but only modifying according what you wanted to by using a misleading edit summary.[1] Abhishek0831996 (talk) 15:09, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
surprised that you are here as part of the discussion now. Interesting. It was clearly a correction as the quotes you added were false quotes which were part of the war during initial state and not what the end result was in 1782. Therefore, the quotes you used were definitely misleading. MehmoodS (talk) 15:13, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You are forgetting I left a message here about 8 hours ago. A source already existed on infobox which says "This period also coincided with the First Anglo-Maratha War, which was settled only in 1782 with a Maratha victory over the British and their local allies.". How you could "correct" anything by misrepresenting the source? Abhishek0831996 (talk) 15:27, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You need to take such source such as that of Barbara West through WP:RSN to get opinion about its reliability because its not as Barbara A. West holds a Ph.D. in social anthropology from the University of Rochester in New York. She is not an academicians historian. I didn't even look at her citation earlier due to above reason as it wasn't worthy to look at as compared to other citations by actual historians such as M.S. Naravane, Richard Ernest Dupuy, Gay M. Hammerman, Grace P. Hayes, James C. Bradford. And the quotes by these historians were added as correction which were misrepresented earlier.MehmoodS (talk) 15:50, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whats the problem?

What is the problem in adding “Chhatrapati” to Shivaji Maharaj? How is this disruptive? Kindly explain! Avinash.umb (talk) 17:13, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

answered on your talk page. MehmoodS (talk) 17:21, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why you are continuously removing Shivaji Maharaj's name as one liner? Ankitudawant (talk) 16:07, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

answered on your talk page.MehmoodS (talk) 16:17, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

×== Edit ==

We were editing at the same time which I kinda messed up your edit without knowing. Wikipedia is bugging for me, I cannot post a correct edit for some reason. S.G ReDark (talk) 02:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

S.G ReDark Please continue with your edits. I will review it later if any format or alignment needs fixed. MehmoodS (talk) 02:28, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks:) S.G ReDark (talk) 02:30, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well finished ..... kinda for some reason I can't edit properly which causes my edits to be a mess. Can you fix the rest since I can't for some reason S.G ReDark (talk) 02:38, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

S.G ReDark Publication subsection looks good. Is there any section you need help with? Overall, well written. MehmoodS (talk) 02:45, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks that means a lot. Well I wanted to do the same above with the exhibitions. Example

  • Exhibition 1
  • Exhibition 2

and so on (hopefully you understand what I mean). S.G ReDark (talk) 02:50, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

S.G ReDark yes please continue. You can also use your own sandbox to experiment. MehmoodS (talk) 02:58, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, how does it work? S.G ReDark (talk) 02:59, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just started editing Wikipedia so I don't know much S.G ReDark (talk) 03:00, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

S.G ReDark This link will provide you information and instruction on sandbox. Wikipedia:Sandbox MehmoodS (talk) 03:04, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I'll check it. Also I made a new update check it if you want :) S.G ReDark (talk) 03:11, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Made minor fix but looks good otherwise.MehmoodS (talk) 12:01, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:HaughtonBrit per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HaughtonBrit. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Vanjagenije (talk) 21:23, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

MehmoodS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is my one and only account. This block is a mistake. Please look at my contributions and they are all made with sincerity and dedication in improving the encyclopedia. This request has been submitted in bad faith to prevent from examining edits by Aman.kumar.Goel on article First Anglo-Maratha War. The information had inconsistencies and was not supported by the citations. Even the quotes within the templates were incorrect. I made correction and added citation as well as updated quote parameter as can be seen here [2] and here [3]. And this change was first reverted by Abhishek0831996 [4] and after I reverted Abhishek0831996 with description to discuss concern in talk page which I previously did as well, Aman.kumar.goel steps in and reverts my changes back to version by Abhishek0831996 [5]. I believe an off wiki canvassing was in place here as this concern was discussed previously [6]. Tamzin can provide more insight about this previous case. Aman.kumar.goel's reason for revert was "copyvio" and after questioning him for clarification, he made a statement that "You are not allowed to use large quotations in "quote=" parameter. It should not exceed more than 25 words in general." [7]. I haven't heard of such rule so far and needed verification from admin. I contacted admin who didn't agree with this statement [8] and I let Aman.kumar.goel know about it on First Anglo-Maratha War article's talk page where I initially started discussion about the dispute. Aman.kumar.goel accused me of canvassing and I told him that to get verification or confirmation is not canvassing [9]. I went ahead and submitted request on WP:RSN on two questionable authors where one is Humanist and the other is Anthropologist and do not have expertise in the subject as neither are historians [10]. I also submitted request for opinion on examining the result on the article on [11], due to dispute and it was necessary for 3rd opinions. Aman.kumar.goel I believe was upset with such submission of investigation and to prevent it,  submitted this sock request in bad faith. I have been a very sincere editor throughout 8 months. Since I have been here, I have used necessary platforms to resolve disputes. I have also prevented disruptions and vandalism and made tremendous improvement to encyclopedia and would like to continue to do so. My edit history speaks for my contributions and credibility as faithful editor. I am sorry for this long message as I felt it was necessary to detail the facts and I am also sorry if I offended anyone as that isn't my intention from this message. Please Vanjagenije, or Bbb23, GeneralNotability, Tamzin or any other Admins, please review my request and sincerely request you to unblock me. MehmoodS (talk) 23:18, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=This is my one and only account. This block is a mistake. Please look at my contributions and they are all made with sincerity and dedication in improving the encyclopedia. This request has been submitted in bad faith to prevent from examining edits by Aman.kumar.Goel on article [[First Anglo-Maratha War]]. The information had inconsistencies and was not supported by the citations. Even the quotes within the templates were incorrect. I made correction and added citation as well as updated quote parameter as can be seen here [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=First_Anglo-Maratha_War&diff=1092274086] and here [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=First_Anglo-Maratha_War&diff=1092311543]. And this change was first reverted by Abhishek0831996 [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=First_Anglo-Maratha_War&diff=1092291697] and after I reverted Abhishek0831996 with description to discuss concern in talk page which I previously did as well, Aman.kumar.goel steps in and reverts my changes back to version by Abhishek0831996 [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=First_Anglo-Maratha_War&diff=1092312293]. I believe an off wiki canvassing was in place here as this concern was discussed previously [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Aman.kumar.goel/Archive]. [[User:Tamzin|Tamzin]] can provide more insight about this previous case. Aman.kumar.goel's reason for revert was "copyvio" and after questioning him for clarification, he made a statement that "You are not allowed to use large quotations in "quote=" parameter. It should not exceed more than 25 words in general." [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MehmoodS&diff=1092314014]. I haven't heard of such rule so far and needed verification from admin. I contacted admin who didn't agree with this statement [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RegentsPark&diff=1092328506] and I let Aman.kumar.goel know about it on First Anglo-Maratha War article's talk page where I initially started discussion about the dispute. Aman.kumar.goel accused me of canvassing and I told him that to get verification or confirmation is not canvassing [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Aman.kumar.goel&diff=1092499452]. I went ahead and submitted request on [[WP:RSN]] on two questionable authors where one is Humanist and the other is Anthropologist and do not have expertise in the subject as neither are historians [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Unreliable_sources_on_First_Anglo-Maratha_War]. I also submitted request for opinion on examining the result on the article on [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#First_Anglo-Maratha_War_result_dispute], due to dispute and it was necessary for 3rd opinions. Aman.kumar.goel I believe was upset with such submission of investigation and to prevent it,  submitted this sock request in bad faith. I have been a very sincere editor throughout 8 months. Since I have been here, I have used necessary platforms to resolve disputes. I have also prevented disruptions and vandalism and made tremendous improvement to encyclopedia and would like to continue to do so. My edit history speaks for my contributions and credibility as faithful editor. I am sorry for this long message as I felt it was necessary to detail the facts and I am also sorry if I offended anyone as that isn't my intention from this message. Please [[User:Vanjagenije|Vanjagenije]], or [[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]], [[User:GeneralNotability|GeneralNotability]], [[User:Tamzin|Tamzin]] or any other Admins, please review my request and sincerely request you to unblock me. [[User:MehmoodS|MehmoodS]] ([[User talk:MehmoodS#top|talk]]) 23:18, 5 July 2022 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=This is my one and only account. This block is a mistake. Please look at my contributions and they are all made with sincerity and dedication in improving the encyclopedia. This request has been submitted in bad faith to prevent from examining edits by Aman.kumar.Goel on article [[First Anglo-Maratha War]]. The information had inconsistencies and was not supported by the citations. Even the quotes within the templates were incorrect. I made correction and added citation as well as updated quote parameter as can be seen here [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=First_Anglo-Maratha_War&diff=1092274086] and here [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=First_Anglo-Maratha_War&diff=1092311543]. And this change was first reverted by Abhishek0831996 [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=First_Anglo-Maratha_War&diff=1092291697] and after I reverted Abhishek0831996 with description to discuss concern in talk page which I previously did as well, Aman.kumar.goel steps in and reverts my changes back to version by Abhishek0831996 [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=First_Anglo-Maratha_War&diff=1092312293]. I believe an off wiki canvassing was in place here as this concern was discussed previously [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Aman.kumar.goel/Archive]. [[User:Tamzin|Tamzin]] can provide more insight about this previous case. Aman.kumar.goel's reason for revert was "copyvio" and after questioning him for clarification, he made a statement that "You are not allowed to use large quotations in "quote=" parameter. It should not exceed more than 25 words in general." [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MehmoodS&diff=1092314014]. I haven't heard of such rule so far and needed verification from admin. I contacted admin who didn't agree with this statement [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RegentsPark&diff=1092328506] and I let Aman.kumar.goel know about it on First Anglo-Maratha War article's talk page where I initially started discussion about the dispute. Aman.kumar.goel accused me of canvassing and I told him that to get verification or confirmation is not canvassing [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Aman.kumar.goel&diff=1092499452]. I went ahead and submitted request on [[WP:RSN]] on two questionable authors where one is Humanist and the other is Anthropologist and do not have expertise in the subject as neither are historians [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Unreliable_sources_on_First_Anglo-Maratha_War]. I also submitted request for opinion on examining the result on the article on [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#First_Anglo-Maratha_War_result_dispute], due to dispute and it was necessary for 3rd opinions. Aman.kumar.goel I believe was upset with such submission of investigation and to prevent it,  submitted this sock request in bad faith. I have been a very sincere editor throughout 8 months. Since I have been here, I have used necessary platforms to resolve disputes. I have also prevented disruptions and vandalism and made tremendous improvement to encyclopedia and would like to continue to do so. My edit history speaks for my contributions and credibility as faithful editor. I am sorry for this long message as I felt it was necessary to detail the facts and I am also sorry if I offended anyone as that isn't my intention from this message. Please [[User:Vanjagenije|Vanjagenije]], or [[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]], [[User:GeneralNotability|GeneralNotability]], [[User:Tamzin|Tamzin]] or any other Admins, please review my request and sincerely request you to unblock me. [[User:MehmoodS|MehmoodS]] ([[User talk:MehmoodS#top|talk]]) 23:18, 5 July 2022 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=This is my one and only account. This block is a mistake. Please look at my contributions and they are all made with sincerity and dedication in improving the encyclopedia. This request has been submitted in bad faith to prevent from examining edits by Aman.kumar.Goel on article [[First Anglo-Maratha War]]. The information had inconsistencies and was not supported by the citations. Even the quotes within the templates were incorrect. I made correction and added citation as well as updated quote parameter as can be seen here [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=First_Anglo-Maratha_War&diff=1092274086] and here [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=First_Anglo-Maratha_War&diff=1092311543]. And this change was first reverted by Abhishek0831996 [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=First_Anglo-Maratha_War&diff=1092291697] and after I reverted Abhishek0831996 with description to discuss concern in talk page which I previously did as well, Aman.kumar.goel steps in and reverts my changes back to version by Abhishek0831996 [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=First_Anglo-Maratha_War&diff=1092312293]. I believe an off wiki canvassing was in place here as this concern was discussed previously [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Aman.kumar.goel/Archive]. [[User:Tamzin|Tamzin]] can provide more insight about this previous case. Aman.kumar.goel's reason for revert was "copyvio" and after questioning him for clarification, he made a statement that "You are not allowed to use large quotations in "quote=" parameter. It should not exceed more than 25 words in general." [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MehmoodS&diff=1092314014]. I haven't heard of such rule so far and needed verification from admin. I contacted admin who didn't agree with this statement [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RegentsPark&diff=1092328506] and I let Aman.kumar.goel know about it on First Anglo-Maratha War article's talk page where I initially started discussion about the dispute. Aman.kumar.goel accused me of canvassing and I told him that to get verification or confirmation is not canvassing [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Aman.kumar.goel&diff=1092499452]. I went ahead and submitted request on [[WP:RSN]] on two questionable authors where one is Humanist and the other is Anthropologist and do not have expertise in the subject as neither are historians [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Unreliable_sources_on_First_Anglo-Maratha_War]. I also submitted request for opinion on examining the result on the article on [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#First_Anglo-Maratha_War_result_dispute], due to dispute and it was necessary for 3rd opinions. Aman.kumar.goel I believe was upset with such submission of investigation and to prevent it,  submitted this sock request in bad faith. I have been a very sincere editor throughout 8 months. Since I have been here, I have used necessary platforms to resolve disputes. I have also prevented disruptions and vandalism and made tremendous improvement to encyclopedia and would like to continue to do so. My edit history speaks for my contributions and credibility as faithful editor. I am sorry for this long message as I felt it was necessary to detail the facts and I am also sorry if I offended anyone as that isn't my intention from this message. Please [[User:Vanjagenije|Vanjagenije]], or [[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]], [[User:GeneralNotability|GeneralNotability]], [[User:Tamzin|Tamzin]] or any other Admins, please review my request and sincerely request you to unblock me. [[User:MehmoodS|MehmoodS]] ([[User talk:MehmoodS#top|talk]]) 23:18, 5 July 2022 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
GeneralNotability thank you for looking into my request. Like I mentioned in my unblock request, this is my one and only account. I have not used any other account simultaneously. Please look at my contribution history. My work speaks of me as a faithful editor who has worked everyday to stop disruption and vandalism. Please I request you to unblock me. Please do consider. MehmoodS (talk) 03:47, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
GeneralNotability, vandalism is happening on pages that I prevented them from such as on Battle of Umberkhind, Battle of Kolhapur, Baji Prabhu Deshpande, where IPs and new accounts are pushing honorifics into these pages. There is no one checking these pages and editors like Akshaypatill who are aware of this, are not taking any actions against such disruptions or warning editors of MOS:HON and then there are other pending change reviewers who have witnessed it, but just turn the blind eye. Please look at my contribution where I constantly warned and protected pages from such disruptions. Please do consider of unblocking me so that I can continue to improve encyclopedia and prevent its articles from being disrupted. MehmoodS (talk) 12:12, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • MehmoodS, with two admins looking at the CU data, I don't think you can come back easily from this (I also note your use of simultaneously in "not used any other account simultaneously"). My suggestion is that you fess up on all accounts you have ever used, simultaneously or not, declare which account you will continue to use going forward (that becomes your primary account), then find something else to do for a minimum of six months and see if you can convince someone to unblock you. I suggest you read WP:SOCKBLOCK carefully. --RegentsPark (comment) 16:12, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
RegentsPark editors with two or more accounts simultaneously, is to mislead, deceive, vandalize or disrupt. A great example would be Suthasianhistorian8 who had about 7-8 accounts that he used simultaneously. I have followed sockpuppet policy and that is why only used one account. Since I have had this account, I haven't had any other account that I used simultaneously with this account and I don't know what CU data is of concern here. This is my one and only account that I have used in last 9 months and this the only account that I have been using and will continue with moving forward and this is my only primary account. When you say that find something else to do for 6 months, what exactly do you mean? Do you mean to step away for six months from Wikipedia and then re-request to unblock? But can't admins continue to investigate as I have digressed enough to look at my contribution and tell me if I have in any way caused any nuisance or disruption on Wikipedia. I just request to have my account unblocked. MehmoodS (talk) 17:02, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MehmoodS&oldid=1097258893"