User talk:Loom91/Archive 2: Difference between revisions

Archives
May 2005 – May 2006 (Dispute over Chandrabindu (band) and my blocking, among other things)

This is my talk page, feel free to leave constructive and destructive comments. You won't be reverted unless you are clearly vandalising.

The movie is named "Robibar Bikalbela", Sunday Afternoon in english. I don't keep up with the band culture avidly, but probably Fossils rule the youth segment currently, with Chandrabindu taking another portion. But I may be wrong. Loom91 07:15, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Greetings! I read on the featured article page that the quantum mechanics article is in danger of losing FA status because of the factual inaccuracies. I have seen these inaccuracies, and I can remedy them for the article. I'll do a correct rewrite of the affected sections. By the way, you mentioned NPOV. The funny thing is, in physics, there simply is no POV. The mathematics founding a theory is self consistent and forms the core. There are only interpretations. However, in quantum mechanics the most widely accepted interpretation of the equations is the Born statistical interpretation, but I find it hard to come up with sources, since there is no single authorative source in a peer-reviewed science. Albester 08:44, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for what you did. It unfortunately did not help. I do not think that anyone who endorsed the other statement even read the one I wrote, and the other statement mostly consisted of personal attacks without much basis in reality. Most of the signers of the other statement had not even been editing on the page until right before the page was blocked. I still do feel there is censorship going on. I put a note in on PAIN to report the personal attacks, but who knows what will happen with that. I'm not editing on Wikipedia anymore until something happens with this. It is really alarming and dissappointing. Elizmr 17:44, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

I was surprised to find that you have moved JEE to IITJEE without any discussion. There is no information on this topic on talkpage. Moving an article is big issue and consensus should have been taken. While it is true that JEE refers to many exams, predominant exam should get the title, while other can have a disambiguation page. By predominant, I mean, one which is more likely to be searched by people. In this case it is even more surprising because you referred to only one exam, WBJEE, which does not has its article page even. So I cannot figure out exactly what is need for moving or disambiguation? AshishG^talk 16:19, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

The correct approach here should have been to create an article JEE (disambiguation) or Joint Entrance Examination (disambiguation), especially since there are a lot of article linking to the current one. Also, there was no need to hurry as there is no page on WB-JEE yet. I suggest we move back the page with some admin's help. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 17:04, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

We have an emergency! Report to CAUBXD immediately and click on the last "e" in the link "User:Fredil Yupigo/signature". Freddie^{Against Userbox Deletion?} 18:52, 22 May 2006 (UTC)