User talk:Jambonec: Difference between revisions
→unnecessary removal of content by ThatMontrealIP: new section |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== unnecessary removal of content by ThatMontrealIP == |
== unnecessary removal of content by ThatMontrealIP == |
||
MontrealIP you stated the websites are a violation, but they are not. Website links are allowed as informational directions. Emek- is a popular artist with works that are often bootleg and not released by this artist. Providing links to his direct website is a service to the public, so that they can locate his products. If you feel that is a violation, you need to flag it, you cannot just remove information based on your own biased opinions. |
|||
The flag was for a book released by Gingko Press, which I removed to adhere to the policy that we not quote any articles that might lean in the artists' favor. In this case you removed my edits to correct this. |
The flag was for a book released by Gingko Press, which I removed to adhere to the policy that we not quote any articles that might lean in the artists' favor. In this case you removed my edits to correct this. |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
I am putting the edits back with new sources which you say are terrible, but are actual third party sources as requested. |
I am putting the edits back with new sources which you say are terrible, but are actual third party sources as requested. |
||
MontrealIP you have many opinions, not seeing any intellectual basis behind your opinions. If you have so many issues with the articles I have provided, provide useful and helpful articles we can reference so people can enjoy solid information about this artist. |
|||
From where I sit, appears you are trying to dismantle Emek's credibility as an artist, which makes your writings appear biased. Do you have something against this individual? If so, you probably should not edit on this page any further. |
From where I sit, appears you are trying to dismantle Emek's credibility as an artist, which makes your writings appear biased. Do you have something against this individual? If so, you probably should not edit on this page any further. |
||
I am officially requesting you adhere to Wikipedia policy and leave the edits as they are, as they were requested by the Commons and fulfill that request. |
I am officially requesting you adhere to Wikipedia policy and leave the edits as they are, as they were requested by the Commons and fulfill that request. You have provided no valid reason for its removal. |
||
Your edits are a direct |
|||
Your comment is understandable regarding "self promotion" and to adhere to the unbiased policy of Wikipedia, I will remove any other refere cLVG 04:56, 29 November 2019 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 04:58, 29 November 2019
Emec
Please do not advertise an online store (as you did here), It is clear promotion and you will be blocked very quickly if you continue to do that. Also, do not remove good sources and replace them with poorer ones like Collectors Weekly, a commercially-oriented publication. See WP:RS, which also applies to the edit above where you added Youtube as a source. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 03:16, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
unnecessary removal of content by ThatMontrealIP
MontrealIP you stated the websites are a violation, but they are not. Website links are allowed as informational directions. Emek- is a popular artist with works that are often bootleg and not released by this artist. Providing links to his direct website is a service to the public, so that they can locate his products. If you feel that is a violation, you need to flag it, you cannot just remove information based on your own biased opinions.
The flag was for a book released by Gingko Press, which I removed to adhere to the policy that we not quote any articles that might lean in the artists' favor. In this case you removed my edits to correct this.
I am putting the edits back with new sources which you say are terrible, but are actual third party sources as requested.
MontrealIP you have many opinions, not seeing any intellectual basis behind your opinions. If you have so many issues with the articles I have provided, provide useful and helpful articles we can reference so people can enjoy solid information about this artist.
From where I sit, appears you are trying to dismantle Emek's credibility as an artist, which makes your writings appear biased. Do you have something against this individual? If so, you probably should not edit on this page any further.
I am officially requesting you adhere to Wikipedia policy and leave the edits as they are, as they were requested by the Commons and fulfill that request. You have provided no valid reason for its removal.