User talk:FrB.TG: Difference between revisions

Hello, Frank, it has been a while. How are things with you? I have nominated this list for FLC and would certainly appreciate your comments here.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 13:12, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, FrB.TG. I'm just posting to let you know that List of awards and nominations received by Leonardo DiCaprio – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for November 10. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 21:26, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Scarlett Johansson has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the FAC.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:39, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• A popular contemporary recording artist, she is known for experimenting with new musical ideas and images and for her unconventionality and provocative work.

This is straying into POV, though? Saying that she is "known" for this is an absolutely huge claim to make and it's not based in fact whatsoever. It's a normative claim and it reeks of positive bias. We all love LG and want to portray her well but that isn't neutral. And regardless, it's kinda legacy section material anyway? Wikipedia should not open articles with opinionated, subjective and likely biased sweeping statements. 333cale (talk) 04:54, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To say an artist is known for doing certain type of work is in no way POV. It is a fact that Gaga constantly experiments with new musical ideas and images (notice how different each of her albums is) and is known for her unconventionality (e.g. her outlandish fashion sense) and provocative work, and these are properly discussed and sourced in appropriate sections and paragraphs. Just like Marilyn Monroe was known for being a sex symbol for much of her life and Meryl Streep is known for her superior acting method, Gaga is known for what she is known. – FrB.TG (talk) 14:40, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FrB.TG. How are you? I was wondering if you would possibly have time and interest to look at Wikipedia:Peer review/The Breeders Tour 2014/archive1. If you don't, no worries. Thanks for considering, Moisejp (talk) 04:30, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I suppose that would be great. The sections in List of Lady Gaga live performances are the ones I was/am considering using, but I like the performances cronologically. Johnnyboytoy (talk) 18:36, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FrB.TG, do you think you'll have any time to read over Three Sisters (Oregon)? I was hoping to bring it to FAC soon, but I wanted to get a few more pairs of eyes to read over it and give me feedback to fine-tune the prose first. I would love if you could provide me with some feedback. ceranthor 00:55, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. I hope you are having a wonderful day so far. If possible, I would greatly appreciate it if you could provide comments on my current FAC: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Sévérine/archive1? Thank you either way and good luck with your projects both on and off Wikipedia. Aoba47 (talk) 02:38, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just have a question this time. Margaret will appear in a short film which has a poster, will be shown in a cinema (one cinema - limited release) etc. however, it will also serve as a music video for two cuts from her album. the film is titled after the songs and will most likely focus on them, which technically speaking makes it a music video. However, she calls it a short film. It will be shown in a cinema, people will have to buy tickets to see it etc. What would you classify it as then? a film or a music video. and do you think it is worth being mention in the article about her ? ArturSik (talk) 00:16, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest adding a sentence about it in her article. You should note there that it is a short film but will also serve as a music video for the cuts. FrB.TG (talk) 16:26, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

will do that.thank you. ArturSik (talk) 01:01, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Update: okay so i've added the information, do you think it looks okay? + should I include it in her music videos list or her filmography or both ? ArturSik (talk) 01:16, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate your comments as always, Frank. This is my first attempt at a Hollywood film accolades list BTW.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 16:20, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have had enough reviewers there I think. Good luck. FrB.TG (talk) 20:42, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	It's always great to edit and review your great articles. Keep up the good work. John (talk) 20:05, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks and I look forward to your review of Gaga. FrB.TG (talk) 20:42, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Featured article Scarlett Johansson From Ssven2 to FrB.TG, for taking Scarlett Johansson to FA, congratulations on your achievement! Keep it up!  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 16:57, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. It was a really complicated FAC and article to take on. FrB.TG (talk) 17:14, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! on your recent success FrB.TG. Keep excelling. Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:15, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thabk you. FrB.TG (talk) 06:22, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! Excellent work, buddy. (I should also congratulate you in advance for Lady Gaga. I'll put on "Judas" at full blast to celebrate. :)) --Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:43, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Gaga being FA is kinda like my whole purpose in Wikipedia :D so let’s keep our fingers crossed. FrB.TG (talk) 06:52, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]