User talk:Elnencatala: Difference between revisions

Hello, I'm Flooded with them hundreds. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Shaka— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Flooded with them hundreds 20:27, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Elnencatala! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:08, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 01:19, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 20:35, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Politic-Ed is a British-owned, American English political opinion news site. Politic-Ed focuses on international politics news, ranging from policy changes in EU countries to Brexit to presidential elections. Politic-Ed distributes its content through its website and social media platforms.

Politic-Ed is a staunch supporter of CANZUK, a union between Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom.

The aim of the site is to provide free political commentary to the masses, to quote their website it is "The place where CEO's, professors and regular Joe's can come to exchange political ideas"

Politic-Ed was founded in June 2019 as a political news, analysis and opinion site by Raptor Consolidated Media Group. They employed former political lobbyist and analyst Matthew Booten^[1] to be their main reporter, who has served as their Editor in Chief since the beginning.

Unlike many sites, Politic-Ed has no qualms in stating its political leaning- conservatism.

The site is Pro-Trump, however is not afraid to criticize him when criticism is due.

The site is also a staunch supporter of CANZUK, repeatedly attempting to get people to see the benefits of such a union.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NWEB, requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources. LinkedIn is not an acceptable or reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Elnencatala/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Elnencatala/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 23:36, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

International Aviation HQ is a British-owned, American English aviation news site, with a focus on reporting the latest aviation news, analysis and opinion on the latest news from aviation-industry experts! International Aviation HQ distributes its content through its website and social media platforms.

The aim of the site is to provide free commentary on the latest happenings of the aviation industry to other like-minded aviation geeks (sometimes called "Av Geeks"), to quote their website it is "Where industry experts, enthusiasts and photographers come together, it’s where they come to exchange ideas, and talk everything aviation."

International Aviation HQ was founded in June 2019 as an aviation-oriented news, analysis and opinion site by Raptor Consolidated Media Group^[2]. They employed former F-16, 747 and 787 pilot Christopher Harrow to be their main reporter and as their Editor in Chief, a role he has done since the beginning of International Aviation HQ.

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Sulfurboy (talk) 15:22, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's not the way wikipedia works.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 05:31, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Using sock puppets makes it worse.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 14:09, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Elnencatala. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 10:06, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to say hi! Mi lo que solo empiezar de la este interesso no me anque. --ViscountVismut (talk) 12:50, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi too! Jo no me intera, lo es que inlen sola mis enclas! --EtaPravda (talk) 12:54, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Mate! I may not speak Catalan, but I would like to ask you something: Catalan independence- yay or nay? --HK2267 (talk) 18:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Elnencatala. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ST47 (talk) 18:18, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no... --Hazza9976 (talk) 21:27, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]