User talk:Larry laptop: Difference between revisions

user_talk:Charlesknight/archive 1 : all til 16/10/06

Hey! You back :) thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 20:47, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I saw some trash that needed taking out - I couldn't resist. --Charlesknight 20:48, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AAAAAAGGGGHHHH!

If that doesn't get speedied, I'm writing an article on myself. I can make up about as many wimpy claims to fame as Stevie Boy can but I've actually got proof for them all ;)

--Kiand 21:19, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed the speedy tag for you. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 21:23, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you use messenger (AIM/MSN?) thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 21:25, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to see someone else agrees with me... Valrith 22:38, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was not expelled from school. Steve Skerrett was arrested for conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and now runs a private detective agency called Giotto Investigations. I am going to have to go to mediator on this. Fiona-Mont 16:16, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure I would qualify as a "kindly administrator", but I'll try. I've watchlisted the page, tidied it up a bit, and left the user claiming to be the subject a note about WP:AUTO. --Guinnog 22:30, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I did not make that edit. My username is Wordybookworm, and I edit from that username. Is it possible for someone to use my IP address? I'm sorry, I do not know much in the areas of IP addresses and such.

I'm simply afraid that I will be banned. x_x

I've checked out the WHOISes on this guy and all IP addresses that he does his cruft-editing at and apparently he's from Singapore. He's been vandalising both the Time Crisis and House of the Dead articles like he owns them. Is there a possibility that we can invoke a 1-week block at Singapore just to ensure that this crystal ball vandal understands that Wikipedia is not a crystal ball/forum? Please advise. — Vesther (U * T/R * CTD) 14:16, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support -- and thanks for your careful vigilance over the mobile phone article. --A. B. 16:33, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And thanks for your help with getting the correct reference in place. Antb 19:11, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

you are ruining this website.

seconded.

Please sign your comments in future, it makes it easier to determine who's whining about what. --Charlesknight 09:07, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yep.. it was scary :P! Matthew Fenton (talk · contribs · count · email) 09:06, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you are talking about. Why would I refrain from using comments like that? I don't even understand what you are asking about, and what does civility have anything to do with it? Stop leaving nonsense on my talk page. --Treva 18:03, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The thing is, you are not acting in good faith. You are disturbing me and my conversations with other users. And once again, I repeat: Stop leaving nonsense on my talk page. Besides, I was not targeting any specific eidtors, but instead those that delete perfectly find article for ludicrous reasons. The thing that I don't understand was why you had to bust in talking about civility and ridiculous things about what I post on other people's user pages. It was not malicious or hurtful and therefore you should stop trying to act like an administrator. Therefore, stop posting nonsense on my talk page and leave me alone. --Treva 18:15, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I see that you have converted the prod tag into a CSDG4 tag. Of course, I'm not here to complain (!) but I'd love to know what deletion debate it was. Was it specifically on that weapon or a more general Halo weapons group-deletion or, better yet, an all encompassing video-game-weapons-cruft debate? Pascal.Tesson 18:29, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Pascal.Tesson 18:35, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, thats not true, however, the article was largely based off that article. The work was between me and a buddy at school. I'm surprised that you are so into this that you actually looked into it that deep. Get a life. --Treva 18:42, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, learn where to leave comments (i.e. not in my adoption space).

Thanks for the heads up. Alyeska 19:17, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will have to look into that.Alyeska 19:24, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you insist on screwing with my articles? Please stop and go outside. Thanks, --Treva 19:44, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thanks again. Will (Talk - contribs) 20:08, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed your request for the deletion of the article John Vaughn and denied it. I do see somewhat of a resemblance, but I considered the article useful and on the creators user page he/she does say that he/she will fix the article. Thank you, --Phat Phantom 20:10, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus that one of the worst sockpuppets I've ever seen - you can see your hand because the sock has so many holes. --Charlesknight 20:18, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have reinstated this user's indefinite block due to continued personal attacks, despite a clear warning for him to stop. Best, Gwernol 20:47, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, I think I'm famous now. Yah that article was copied, and don't expect me to be the only one, because there are a lot more. I still think you should get a life, and whatever was put on my userpage belongs to me and is not an official wikipedia article. The quote by Mark Twain does not referance that I am an excessive alchoholic, but that it is true: Men fight for water but drink whiskey for fun. The thing that i am ten feet tall micks a Chuck Norris facts, along with the others. Some are about Robert Hamburger's interpretation of Ninjas, and if you had a sense of humor you might appreciate it. Yah, I did call you a douche, but once again it was on my user page, not your talk page. The article has nothing to do with the ban, and you do not need to mention that either. I do have various real contributions to Wikipedia, which you seem to ignore. I do not regret anything I said about you, because I keep it real and stick to my opinions, and I am not two-faced. With plenty of love, Treva.