User talk:Unnithan1956: Difference between revisions

Hi. I've removed the "See also" links you added, because the "See also" section of an article is for links to related Wikipedia articles, and those articles don't exist -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:35, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've just done the same thing again. Please stop adding information in this way. - Sitush (talk) 12:54, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Citing from convenient texts which are unrealibale is not the best way to create true history..

Offensive statements from - books of doubtful credibility however old they are - is not a good thing.

Too much vandalism in this page - hope wiki folks have a look at it.

The cock and bull stories of Sadasivan would have found a naive publisher in Delhi. But contains only a clever mixture of false statements and secret wishes.. It does not qualigy to be a book. Please remove all refereneces to this book..

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Nair. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 10:07, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nair, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 07:40, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Nair, you may be blocked from editing. Sitush (talk) 07:41, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nair. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sitush (talk) 07:50, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]