User talk:68.170.0.238: Difference between revisions

Hello, I'm [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}]]. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User talk:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|my talk page]]. Thanks! Meelar (talk) 16:43, May 19, 2005 (UTC)

Please stop making changes to what people have posted on votes for deletion, as it is considered vandalsim. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be banned from editing. - Jersyko 12:28, May 12, 2005 (UTC)

Please discontinue voting more than once in a single vote for deletion. Again, if you continue to vandalize pages, you will be banned from editing. I recommend reading the Wikipedia:vandalism page, particularly the "sneaky vandalism" section. Note that continuous vandalism will get you banned. - Jersyko 03:19, May 17, 2005 (UTC)

Dear 68.170.0.238,

Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Andrew Lin may not be well-known enough to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. By starting an account or logging in, each user is entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. - TigerShark 22:56, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't edit others' user pages. Comments for users may go on their talk page, accessible by clicking the "discussion" tab at the top of the screen. Also, remember to treat other editors with civility and respect. Feel free to ask me if you have any questions. — Knowledge Seeker দ 21:02, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. -- Rama 22:23, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Failed to stop, so blocking. -- Karada 23:32, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If you recreate this article, which was deleted by a valid Votes for Deletion vote, again, you will be blocked from editing. RickK 23:50, May 25, 2005 (UTC)

He's done it twice since you posted this. Please block. Also, note his sockpuppets Andrew Lin and KellyClarksonTV, among others. - Jersyko 23:46, May 26, 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a place to "raise awareness" about your little anti-soda/sugar/whatnot crusade. See What Wikipedia is not. Start a web page. Start a blog. Start a support group. Doing what you're doing is simply going to get you banned, but for a longer period of time . . . - Jersyko 00:21, May 26, 2005 (UTC)

Blocked for 24 hours. If you do it again, you'll be blocked for 48 hours, etc., etc., etc., Got it? RickK 23:57, May 26, 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Thank you for your time. - Jersyko 01:25, May 28, 2005 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --W(t) 07:11, 2005 May 28 (UTC)

Aside from the previously mentioned soapbox article, please read this article about wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. You obviously know quite a bit about the subjects you tend to write about, but your writing would be much more effective and no one would change what you've written if you would adhere to those two policies in your edits. Thanks. (p.s. it's "jer-sī-cō" if you must know) - Jersyko talk 17:59, May 28, 2005 (UTC)