Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

User:The Sage of Stamford: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 107: Line 107:
==Articles for deletion==
==Articles for deletion==
I successfully campaigned for the removal of the article on [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nicky_Blair_(2nd_nomination)|Nicky Blair]], but failed in my campaign against his brother [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Euan Blair|Euan Blair]], although I continue to maintain that the arguments advanced in favour of retention are specious and contrary to the principles of Wikipedia; a battle to be resumed in due course.
I successfully campaigned for the removal of the article on [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nicky_Blair_(2nd_nomination)|Nicky Blair]], but failed in my campaign against his brother [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Euan Blair|Euan Blair]], although I continue to maintain that the arguments advanced in favour of retention are specious and contrary to the principles of Wikipedia; a battle to be resumed in due course.
[[Category:Old Priorians]]

Revision as of 18:25, 13 March 2011

This editor is a
Yeoman Editor
and is entitled to display this Service Badge.

I have been editing as the Sage of Stamford since March 2008. My Wikipedia name was chosen a loose tribute to the Sage of Omaha, substituting an alliterative English placename.

Wikipedia Interests

Other than correcting grammatical solecisms and linguistic infelicities (which could occur in any article I alight upon) my main contributions to date relate to (i) academics, particularly classicists, of the University of Cambridge and related subject matter and (ii) Roman Catholic bishops and other clergy.

Articles created or substantially edited

Articles started or with major edits include:

Classics


Other

Planned Articles

I have articles in various stages of preparation on:

Articles for deletion

I successfully campaigned for the removal of the article on Nicky Blair, but failed in my campaign against his brother Euan Blair, although I continue to maintain that the arguments advanced in favour of retention are specious and contrary to the principles of Wikipedia; a battle to be resumed in due course.