Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Terror (politics): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
6) Restored lede removed 30 March 2011
GreenC bot (talk | contribs)
 
(135 intermediate revisions by 74 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Policy of political repression and violence}}
<!-- Please do not remove or change this AfD message until the issue is settled -->
{{other uses|Terror (disambiguation)}}
{{AfDM|page=Terror (2nd nomination)|year=2011|month=December|day=17|substed=yes|origtag=afdx|help=off}}
{{use dmy dates|date=March 2023}}
<!-- End of AfD message, feel free to edit beyond this point -->
{{also|Political terror scale}}
{{Other uses}}
[[File:Evpatoria red terror corpses at sea coast.jpg|thumb|Victims of ''Red Terror'' in [[Crimea]], 1918]]
'''Terror''', from the [[Latin verbs|Latin verb]] [[wiktionary:terrere|''terrere'']] meaning "to frighten",<ref name="Campbell">{{cite news
'''Terror''' (from [[French (language)|French]] ''terreur'', from [[Latin]] ''terror'' "great fear", [[wiktionary:terrere|''terrere'']] "to frighten"<ref>{{OEtymD|terror}}</ref><ref name="Safire2001">{{cite news |author=William Safire |author-link=William Safire |title=The Way We Live Now: 9-23-01: On Language; Infamy |quote=Finally, the word ''terrorist.'' It is rooted in the Latin ''terrere'', "to frighten," and the ''-ist'' was coined in France to castigate the perpetrators of the [[Reign of Terror]]. |work=New York Times Magazine |date=2001-09-23 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/23/magazine/the-way-we-live-now-9-23-01-on-language-infamy.html |access-date=2019-01-14 |url-access=subscription}}</ref>) is a policy of [[political repression]] and [[political violence|violence]] intended to subdue political opposition. The term first appears in the [[Reign of Terror]], a [[Revolutionary terror|revolutionary violence]] during the [[French Revolution]],<ref name="Safire2001"/><ref>{{cite news |author=Geoffrey Nunberg |title=Head Games / It All Started with Robespierre / "Terrorism": The history of a very frightening word |work=San Francisco Chronicle |date=2001-10-28 |url=https://www.sfgate.com/opinion/article/HEAD-GAMES-It-All-Started-with-Robespierre-2865759.php |access-date=2010-01-11}}</ref> which also gave rise to the term [[terrorism]].<ref>[https://www.britannica.com/topic/terrorism Terrorism], [[Encyclopedia Britannica]]</ref>
|author= Kim Campbell
|title= When is 'terrorist' a subjective term?
|quote= New York Times columnist William Safire wrote that the word "terrorist" has its roots in the Latin terrere, which means "to frighten."
|publisher= Christian Science Monitor
|date= September 27, 2001
|url= http://www.csmonitor.com/2001/0927/p16s2-wogi.html
|accessdate= 2010-01-11
}}</ref> is a policy of [[political repression]] and [[political violence|violence]] intended to subdue political opposition. The term was first used for the [[Reign of Terror]] imposed by the [[Jacobin Club|Jacobins]] during the French Revolution.<ref name="Campbell" /><ref name=tws11jane435>{{cite news
|author= Geoffrey Nunberg
|title= Head Games / It All Started with Robespierre / "Terrorism": The history of a very frightening word
|quote= In 1792 the Jacobins came to power in France and initiated what we call the Reign of Terror and what the French call simply La Terreur.
|publisher= San Francisco Chronicle
|date= October 28, 2001
|url= http://articles.sfgate.com/2001-10-28/opinion/17622543_1_terrorism-robespierre-la-terreur
|accessdate= 2010-01-11
}}</ref> Modern instances of terror include [[Red Terror (disambiguation)|red terror]] or [[White Terror (disambiguation)|white terror]].


Before the advent of modern [[terrorism]], the term ''"terrorism"'' in the English language was sometimes used interchangeable with terror. The modern [[definition of terrorism]] refers to criminal or illegal acts of violence at randomly chosen targets, in an effort to raise fear. It is practiced by extremist groups with a limited political base or parties on the weaker side in [[asymmetric warfare]]. Terror on the other hand is practiced by governments and [[law enforcement]] officials, usually within the legal framework of the state.
Before the late twentieth century, [[Definitions of terrorism|the term "terrorism" in the English language]] was often used interchangeably with "terror". The term "terrorism" frequently refers to acts by groups with a limited political base or parties on the weaker side in [[asymmetric warfare]], while "terror" refers to acts by governments.

==Terror and terrorism==
{{also|Definitions of terrorism}}

Charles Tilly defines "terror" as a political strategy defined as "asymmetrical deployment of threats and violence against enemies using means that fall outside the forms of political struggle routinely operating within some current regime", and therefore ranges from "(1) intermittent actions by members of groups that are engaged in wider political struggles to (2) one segment in the modus operandi of durably organized specialists in coercion, including government-employed and government-backed specialists in coercion to (3) the dominant rationale for distinct, committed groups and networks of activists".<ref name="Tilly2004">{{cite journal |author=Charles Tilly |title=Terror, Terrorism, Terrorists |journal=Sociological Theory |volume=22 |issue=1 |date=March 2004 |pages=5–13 |doi=10.1111/j.1467-9558.2004.00200.x|s2cid=143553555 |url=http://professor-murmann.info/tilly/2004_Terror.pdf |citeseerx=10.1.1.183.7706 }}</ref> According to Tilly, the term "terror" spans a wide range of human cruelties, from Stalin's use of executions to clandestine attacks by groups like the Basque separatists and the [[Irish Republican Army]] and even ethnic cleansing and genocide.<ref name="Tilly2004"/>

==State terrorism==
{{Main|State terrorism}}
State terrorism is a particular concept for a type of political terror that is characterized as terror perpetrated by governments, complementing the general understanding of terrorism.


==Revolutionary and counter-revolutionary terror==
==Revolutionary and counter-revolutionary terror==
{{Main|Revolutionary terror}}
{{Main|Revolutionary terror}}
[[Revolutionary terror]], also known as ''"[[Red Terror (disambiguation)|red terror]]"'', was often used by revolutionary governments to suppress [[counterrevolutionaries]]. The first example was the [[Reign of Terror]] during the [[French Revolution]] in 1794.<ref>"Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy", by Barrington Moore, Edward Friedman, James C. Scott (1993) ISBN 0807050733, p.101: "Social Consequences of Revolutionary Terror"</ref><ref>[http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/April08/Lafayette.cov.cn.html French revolutionary terror was a gross exaggeration, say Lafayette experts. By Chandni Navalkha.] April 28, 2008. accessed 5-20-2009</ref> Other notable examples include the ''[[Red Terror]]'' in [[Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic|Soviet Russia]] in 1918–1922, as well as simultaneous campaigns [[Red Terror (Hungary)| in the Hungarian Soviet Republic]] and [[Red Terror (Finland)|in Finland]]. In China [[Red Terror (China)|Red Terror]] in 1966 and 1967 started the [[Cultural revolution]].
[[Revolutionary terror]], also known as "[[Red Terror (disambiguation)|Red Terror]]", was often used by revolutionary governments to suppress [[counterrevolutionaries]]. The first example was the [[Reign of Terror]] during the [[French Revolution]] in 1794.<ref>{{cite book |title=Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy |author=Barrington Moore |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bZV2AAAAQBAJ&dq=%22Social+Consequences+of+Revolutionary+Terror%22&pg=PT113 |via=Google Books |date=1993 |isbn=0-8070-5073-3 |page=101 |chapter=Social Consequences of Revolutionary Terror|publisher=Beacon Press }}<br>- {{cite web |url=http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/April08/Lafayette.cov.cn.html |title=French revolutionary terror was a gross exaggeration, say Lafayette experts |author=Chandni Navalkha |work=Cornell Chronicle |date=2008-04-28 |publisher=Cornell University |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080511155018/http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/April08/Lafayette.cov.cn.html |archivedate=11 May 2008 |access-date=8 March 2023}}</ref> Other notable examples include the [[Red Terror]] in [[Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic|Soviet Russia]] in 1918–1922, as well as simultaneous campaigns [[Red Terror (Hungary)|in the Hungarian Soviet Republic]] and [[Red Terror (Finland)|in Finland]]. In China, [[Red Terror (China)|Red Terror]] in 1966 and 1967 started the [[Cultural revolution]].


Counterrevolutionary terror is usually referred to as ''"[[White Terror (disambiguation)|white terror]]"''. Notable examples are the terror campaigns [[First White Terror|in France]] (1794–1795), [[White Terror (Russia)|in Russia]] (1917–20), [[White Terror (Hungary)|in Hungary]] (1919–1921), and [[White Terror (Spain)|in Spain]].
Counter-revolutionary terror is usually referred to as "[[White Terror (disambiguation)|White Terror]]". Notable examples are the terror campaigns [[First White Terror|in France]] (1794–1795), [[White Terror (Russia)|in Russia]] (1917–20), [[White Terror (Hungary)|in Hungary]] (1919–1921) and [[White Terror (Spain)|in Spain]]. Modern examples of counter-revolutionary terror include [[Operation Condor]] in South America.


==Terror and terrorism==
==Legal prosecution==
[[File:Norsk Sisu fra NORLOGB.jpg|thumb|The [[International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia|ICTY]] Tribunal convicted several people for terror in relation to [[Siege of Sarajevo]]]]
David Forte states that the primary difference between terror and [[terrorism]] is that while terror can be neutrally evil, i.e. random violence committed by robbers, rapists and even soldiers, terrorism has the additional political or moral dimension, being the systemised use of randomly focused violence by organised groups against civilian targets to effect a political objective.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Forte |first1=David F.|last2= |first2= |year=1986 |title=Terror and Terrorism: There Is a Difference |journal=Ohio Northern University Law Review |volume=13 |issue= |pages=39-52 |publisher=Ohio Northern University Pettit College of Law |doi= |url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/onulr13&div=13&id=&page= |accessdate= }}</ref>
The Hague-based [[International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia]] (ICTY) found [[Stanislav Galić]], the [[Bosnian Serb]] [[commander]] of the Sarajevo-Romanija Corps of the [[Army of Republika Srpska]] (VRS), [[Radovan Karadžić]], the [[President of Republika Srpska]], and [[Ratko Mladić]], Chief of Staff of VRS, guilty of terror as a [[Crimes against humanity|crime against humanity]], among other crimes, for their role in the [[Siege of Sarajevo]] during the [[Bosnian War]], and sentenced them each to [[life imprisonment]].<ref>{{cite web|title=UN war crimes tribunal sentences Bosnian Serb general to life in jail|url=https://news.un.org/en/story/2006/11/201412-un-war-crimes-tribunal-sentences-bosnian-serb-general-life-jail|date=30 November 2006|publisher=UN News|access-date=4 May 2018|archive-date=4 May 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180504225425/https://news.un.org/en/story/2006/11/201412-un-war-crimes-tribunal-sentences-bosnian-serb-general-life-jail|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://news.un.org/en/story/2016/03/525262-un-welcomes-historic-guilty-verdict-against-radovan-karadzic|date=24 March 2016|title=UN welcomes 'historic' guilty verdict against Radovan Karadžić|publisher=UN News|access-date=15 April 2018|archive-date=15 January 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190115023115/https://news.un.org/en/story/2016/03/525262-un-welcomes-historic-guilty-verdict-against-radovan-karadzic|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=58143#.WhadpdLiXIU|title=UN hails conviction of Mladic, the 'epitome of evil,' a momentous victory for justice|date=22 November 2017|publisher=UN News|access-date=23 November 2017|archive-date=31 July 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210731100924/https://news.un.org/en/story/2017/11/636942-un-hails-conviction-mladic-epitome-evil-momentous-victory-justice#.WhadpdLiXIU|url-status=live}}</ref>


In the Galić judgement, the ICTY found that the term "terror" refers to an attack or targeting of civilians or civilian property not justified by military necessity, its only objective being spreading extreme fear among civilian population. It was declared a violation of the [[Laws or customs of war|Laws or Customs of War]] (Article 51 of Additional Protocol I to the [[Third Geneva Convention|Geneva Conventions of 1949]]). The [[Defense (legal)|legal defense]] of Galić argued that the defendant cannot be convicted of terror due to the rule ''[[Nulla poena sine lege]]'', but the Tribunal found that the first conviction for terror against a civilian population was already delivered previously in July 1947 by a court-martial sitting in [[Makassar]] in the [[Dutch East Indies|Netherlands East-Indies]], during the [[Indonesian National Revolution]], and was therefore applicable.<ref>{{cite web| title=ICTY, The Prosecutor v. Galić - How does law protect in war?| url=https://casebook.icrc.org/case-study/icty-prosecutor-v-galic| work= [[International Committee of the Red Cross|ICRC]]}}</ref>
However Charles Tilly defines "terror" as a political strategy defined as "''asymmetrical deployment of threats and violence against enemies using means that fall outside the forms of political struggle routinely operating within some current regime''", and therefore ranges from<ref>Charles Tilly. Terror, Terrorism, Terrorists. ''Sociological Theory'', Vol. 22, No. 1, Theories of Terrorism: A Symposium (Mar., 2004), pp. 5-13</ref>:
<blockquote>
#intermittent actions by members of groups that are engaged in wider political struggles to
#one segment in the modus operandi of durably organized specialists in coercion, including government-employed and government-backed specialists in coercion to
#the dominant rationale for distinct, committed groups and networks of activists.
</blockquote>


==See also==
According to Tilly, the term "terror" spans across a wide range of human cruelties, from Stalin's use of executions to clandestine attacks by groups like the Basque separatists and the [[Irish Republican Army|IRA]] and even ethnic cleansing and genocide<ref>Tilly, p9</ref>
* [[Balance of terror]]
* [[Demoralization (warfare)]]
* [[Shock and awe]]


==References==
==References==
{{Reflist}}
{{reflist}}
[[Category:English words]]
{{vocab-stub}}


[[de:Terror]]
[[Category:Fear]]
[[es:Terror]]
[[Category:Violence]]
[[Category:Political repression]]
[[fr:Terreur]]
[[pl:Terror]]
[[ru:Террор]]

Latest revision as of 00:37, 1 November 2024

Victims of Red Terror in Crimea, 1918

Terror (from French terreur, from Latin terror "great fear", terrere "to frighten"[1][2]) is a policy of political repression and violence intended to subdue political opposition. The term first appears in the Reign of Terror, a revolutionary violence during the French Revolution,[2][3] which also gave rise to the term terrorism.[4]

Before the late twentieth century, the term "terrorism" in the English language was often used interchangeably with "terror". The term "terrorism" frequently refers to acts by groups with a limited political base or parties on the weaker side in asymmetric warfare, while "terror" refers to acts by governments.

Terror and terrorism

[edit]

Charles Tilly defines "terror" as a political strategy defined as "asymmetrical deployment of threats and violence against enemies using means that fall outside the forms of political struggle routinely operating within some current regime", and therefore ranges from "(1) intermittent actions by members of groups that are engaged in wider political struggles to (2) one segment in the modus operandi of durably organized specialists in coercion, including government-employed and government-backed specialists in coercion to (3) the dominant rationale for distinct, committed groups and networks of activists".[5] According to Tilly, the term "terror" spans a wide range of human cruelties, from Stalin's use of executions to clandestine attacks by groups like the Basque separatists and the Irish Republican Army and even ethnic cleansing and genocide.[5]

State terrorism

[edit]

State terrorism is a particular concept for a type of political terror that is characterized as terror perpetrated by governments, complementing the general understanding of terrorism.

Revolutionary and counter-revolutionary terror

[edit]

Revolutionary terror, also known as "Red Terror", was often used by revolutionary governments to suppress counterrevolutionaries. The first example was the Reign of Terror during the French Revolution in 1794.[6] Other notable examples include the Red Terror in Soviet Russia in 1918–1922, as well as simultaneous campaigns in the Hungarian Soviet Republic and in Finland. In China, Red Terror in 1966 and 1967 started the Cultural revolution.

Counter-revolutionary terror is usually referred to as "White Terror". Notable examples are the terror campaigns in France (1794–1795), in Russia (1917–20), in Hungary (1919–1921) and in Spain. Modern examples of counter-revolutionary terror include Operation Condor in South America.

[edit]
The ICTY Tribunal convicted several people for terror in relation to Siege of Sarajevo

The Hague-based International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) found Stanislav Galić, the Bosnian Serb commander of the Sarajevo-Romanija Corps of the Army of Republika Srpska (VRS), Radovan Karadžić, the President of Republika Srpska, and Ratko Mladić, Chief of Staff of VRS, guilty of terror as a crime against humanity, among other crimes, for their role in the Siege of Sarajevo during the Bosnian War, and sentenced them each to life imprisonment.[7][8][9]

In the Galić judgement, the ICTY found that the term "terror" refers to an attack or targeting of civilians or civilian property not justified by military necessity, its only objective being spreading extreme fear among civilian population. It was declared a violation of the Laws or Customs of War (Article 51 of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions of 1949). The legal defense of Galić argued that the defendant cannot be convicted of terror due to the rule Nulla poena sine lege, but the Tribunal found that the first conviction for terror against a civilian population was already delivered previously in July 1947 by a court-martial sitting in Makassar in the Netherlands East-Indies, during the Indonesian National Revolution, and was therefore applicable.[10]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Harper, Douglas. "terror". Online Etymology Dictionary.
  2. ^ a b William Safire (23 September 2001). "The Way We Live Now: 9-23-01: On Language; Infamy". New York Times Magazine. Retrieved 14 January 2019. Finally, the word terrorist. It is rooted in the Latin terrere, "to frighten," and the -ist was coined in France to castigate the perpetrators of the Reign of Terror.
  3. ^ Geoffrey Nunberg (28 October 2001). "Head Games / It All Started with Robespierre / "Terrorism": The history of a very frightening word". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 11 January 2010.
  4. ^ Terrorism, Encyclopedia Britannica
  5. ^ a b Charles Tilly (March 2004). "Terror, Terrorism, Terrorists" (PDF). Sociological Theory. 22 (1): 5–13. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.183.7706. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2004.00200.x. S2CID 143553555.
  6. ^ Barrington Moore (1993). "Social Consequences of Revolutionary Terror". Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Beacon Press. p. 101. ISBN 0-8070-5073-3 – via Google Books.
    - Chandni Navalkha (28 April 2008). "French revolutionary terror was a gross exaggeration, say Lafayette experts". Cornell Chronicle. Cornell University. Archived from the original on 11 May 2008. Retrieved 8 March 2023.
  7. ^ "UN war crimes tribunal sentences Bosnian Serb general to life in jail". UN News. 30 November 2006. Archived from the original on 4 May 2018. Retrieved 4 May 2018.
  8. ^ "UN welcomes 'historic' guilty verdict against Radovan Karadžić". UN News. 24 March 2016. Archived from the original on 15 January 2019. Retrieved 15 April 2018.
  9. ^ "UN hails conviction of Mladic, the 'epitome of evil,' a momentous victory for justice". UN News. 22 November 2017. Archived from the original on 31 July 2021. Retrieved 23 November 2017.
  10. ^ "ICTY, The Prosecutor v. Galić - How does law protect in war?". ICRC.