Talk:Gamaliel: Difference between revisions
Paul Barlow (talk | contribs) |
Eleemosynary (talk | contribs) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:Any such reference should go in [[Gamaliel (disambiguation)]]. [[User:Paul Barlow|Paul B]] 21:14, 30 August 2006 (UTC) |
:Any such reference should go in [[Gamaliel (disambiguation)]]. [[User:Paul Barlow|Paul B]] 21:14, 30 August 2006 (UTC) |
||
==Joehazelton is back== |
|||
This sockpuppet you have banned is back as Willie Peter [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AWillie_Peter&diff=140673882&oldid=140269760]. He's been able to hoodwink a sympathetic admin, but is up to his old tricks. Propol has tagged him as a Hazelton sockpuppet[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AWillie_Peter&diff=140647508&oldid=140539930], and he (true to form) has removed the tag from his page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AWillie_Peter&diff=140681492&oldid=140681370]. I'd appreciate your looking into this, as you previously blocked him [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sunfishone][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Fisherking]. His IP [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AWillie_Peter&diff=140269760&oldid=139920232] is within the series of several Joehazelton socks.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Suspected_Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Joehazelton], and his disruptive edits, combativeness, misspellings, grammatical mistakes, ersatz literary references, and threats are the same as ever. Thanks. [[User:Eleemosynary|Eleemosynary]] 05:50, 26 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 05:57, 26 June 2007
- Hey! Who let you in here? Gamaliel 01:05, 9 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Well, if they'll let you in... :) Tregoweth 05:28, 9 Jun 2004 (UTC)
From Wikipedia:Copyright problems
- Gamaliel from "The Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume VI Copyright © 1909 by Robert Appleton Company" - Lucky 6.9 01:57, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- I do believe 1909 is quite all right. Mike H 01:58, Jun 29, 2004 (UTC)
- Possibly. Just being careful. - Lucky 6.9 02:01, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Definitely in the public domain.--Samuel J. Howard 00:58, Jun 30, 2004 (UTC)
- Possibly. Just being careful. - Lucky 6.9 02:01, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- I do believe 1909 is quite all right. Mike H 01:58, Jun 29, 2004 (UTC)
forgot reference to
Gamaliel as the Anti-Sephirah of Yesod on the Tree of Death/Qliphoth in Hebrew Qabalah.
- Any such reference should go in Gamaliel (disambiguation). Paul B 21:14, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Joehazelton is back
This sockpuppet you have banned is back as Willie Peter [1]. He's been able to hoodwink a sympathetic admin, but is up to his old tricks. Propol has tagged him as a Hazelton sockpuppet[2], and he (true to form) has removed the tag from his page [3]. I'd appreciate your looking into this, as you previously blocked him [4][5]. His IP [6] is within the series of several Joehazelton socks.[7], and his disruptive edits, combativeness, misspellings, grammatical mistakes, ersatz literary references, and threats are the same as ever. Thanks. Eleemosynary 05:50, 26 June 2007 (UTC)