Talk:Mitsubishi 6A1 engine: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 125.161.192.190 - "→Engine weight: new section" |
m Adding {{WikiProject banner shell}} (Task 19) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=}} |
|||
'In 1994, the Kotsumi's brothers from Kanagawa, Japan, managed to turn the 1.6 litre engine into a 'little monster' able to produce 430 bhp (320 kW) @ 6000 rpm without a forced induction system'. 430bhp @ 6000rpm would require ~376 lb/ft of torque at that same 6000rpm. For a 1600cc naturally aspirated gasoline otto cycle engine, that is thermodynamically impossible. |
'In 1994, the Kotsumi's brothers from Kanagawa, Japan, managed to turn the 1.6 litre engine into a 'little monster' able to produce 430 bhp (320 kW) @ 6000 rpm without a forced induction system'. 430bhp @ 6000rpm would require ~376 lb/ft of torque at that same 6000rpm. For a 1600cc naturally aspirated gasoline otto cycle engine, that is thermodynamically impossible. |
||
Line 13: | Line 15: | ||
Is there a weight data (i.e. The weight of the engine without the gearbox or air cleaner attached) somewhere? I've been looking into articles about engines, and of all 20 or so I've seen so far, none sports engine weight. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/125.161.192.190|125.161.192.190]] ([[User talk:125.161.192.190|talk]]) 23:36, 29 December 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Is there a weight data (i.e. The weight of the engine without the gearbox or air cleaner attached) somewhere? I've been looking into articles about engines, and of all 20 or so I've seen so far, none sports engine weight. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/125.161.192.190|125.161.192.190]] ([[User talk:125.161.192.190|talk]]) 23:36, 29 December 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
The Diamante never used a 6A12 (2.0 V6)or a 6A13 (2.5 V6), it used a 6G71(2.0 V6)as an engine option in the first model and 6G73(2.5 V6)in later models[[User:Kongkit|Kongkit]] ([[User talk:Kongkit|talk]]) 05:59, 27 July 2009 (UTC)Kongkit[[User:Kongkit|Kongkit]] ([[User talk:Kongkit|talk]]) 05:59, 27 July 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 23:17, 11 August 2023
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
'In 1994, the Kotsumi's brothers from Kanagawa, Japan, managed to turn the 1.6 litre engine into a 'little monster' able to produce 430 bhp (320 kW) @ 6000 rpm without a forced induction system'. 430bhp @ 6000rpm would require ~376 lb/ft of torque at that same 6000rpm. For a 1600cc naturally aspirated gasoline otto cycle engine, that is thermodynamically impossible.
Article now tidied and expanded to include the rest of the range. Tuned engine details removed, since I can't find a single source which even mentions the "Kotsumi's brothers", never mind substantiates the claim. --DeLarge 10:50 GMT, 12 April 2006
This article also unfortunately cites no sources at all. Can the author help out and add some please? --Zaktoo 19:37, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
Re: changes to specs of 6A12 DOHC
[edit]- Source to verify original figures: [1] They weren't wrong, so please don't arbitrarily delete. --DeLarge 19:44, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Engine weight
[edit]Is there a weight data (i.e. The weight of the engine without the gearbox or air cleaner attached) somewhere? I've been looking into articles about engines, and of all 20 or so I've seen so far, none sports engine weight. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.161.192.190 (talk) 23:36, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
The Diamante never used a 6A12 (2.0 V6)or a 6A13 (2.5 V6), it used a 6G71(2.0 V6)as an engine option in the first model and 6G73(2.5 V6)in later modelsKongkit (talk) 05:59, 27 July 2009 (UTC)KongkitKongkit (talk) 05:59, 27 July 2009 (UTC)