Editing Talk:Ida Lewis
Appearance
This is a talk page. Please respect the talk page guidelines. |
Content that violates any copyrights will be deleted. Encyclopedic content must be verifiable through citations to reliable sources.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
*'''Support''' [[Julia Arthur]] is not primarily known as "Ida Lewis" despite it being her birth name. The proposed hatnote could send people to that article in the rare event they've gotten to the wrong place (or perhaps there should be a newly-created [[Ida Lewis (disambiguation)]], given the existence of [[Ida Lewis Guillory]] and [[Ida Lewis Rock Light]], but that's a different discussion). [[User:TJRC|TJRC]] ([[User talk:TJRC|talk]]) 02:06, 26 February 2017 (UTC) |
*'''Support''' [[Julia Arthur]] is not primarily known as "Ida Lewis" despite it being her birth name. The proposed hatnote could send people to that article in the rare event they've gotten to the wrong place (or perhaps there should be a newly-created [[Ida Lewis (disambiguation)]], given the existence of [[Ida Lewis Guillory]] and [[Ida Lewis Rock Light]], but that's a different discussion). [[User:TJRC|TJRC]] ([[User talk:TJRC|talk]]) 02:06, 26 February 2017 (UTC) |
||
*'''Support''' Absolutely. We don't have a convention of listing the majority of biographical articles under titles which include the person's occupation. No reason why this one should be any different.[[User:Cadar|Cadar]] ([[User talk:Cadar|talk]]) 10:56, 26 February 2017 (UTC) |
*'''Support''' Absolutely. We don't have a convention of listing the majority of biographical articles under titles which include the person's occupation. No reason why this one should be any different.[[User:Cadar|Cadar]] ([[User talk:Cadar|talk]]) 10:56, 26 February 2017 (UTC) |
||
*'''Support''' as creator, way back when (my God, this is a blast from the past): I was new when I created it, and didn't want to disrespect a redirect. I have no problem with the move. -- |
*'''Support''' as creator, way back when (my God, this is a blast from the past): I was new when I created it, and didn't want to disrespect a redirect. I have no problem with the move. --<font face="Old English Text MT">[[User:Ser Amantio di Nicolao|Ser Amantio di Nicolao]]</font><sup>[[User_talk:Ser Amantio di Nicolao|''Che dicono a Signa?'']]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ser Amantio di Nicolao|'''Lo dicono a Signa.''']]</sub> 20:18, 26 February 2017 (UTC) |
||
---- |
---- |
||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[Wikipedia:Requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Move review|move review]]. No further edits should be made to this section.''</div><!-- Template:RM bottom --> |
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[Wikipedia:Requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Move review|move review]]. No further edits should be made to this section.''</div><!-- Template:RM bottom --> |
||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
: I agree. If it wasn't for Google doodles I wouldn't know of all these wonderful women who serve as role models to me and many other women. Also, these doodles enlighten others in how equally powerful women can be. The message has clearly not gotten across to enough people yet and I thank Google for their educational mission.[[User:Joan|Joan]] ([[User talk:Joan|talk]]) 11:39, 25 February 2017 (UTC) |
: I agree. If it wasn't for Google doodles I wouldn't know of all these wonderful women who serve as role models to me and many other women. Also, these doodles enlighten others in how equally powerful women can be. The message has clearly not gotten across to enough people yet and I thank Google for their educational mission.[[User:Joan|Joan]] ([[User talk:Joan|talk]]) 11:39, 25 February 2017 (UTC) |
||
I personally recognize google doodles as a high praise, most definitely worthy of report. Thank you. [[User:Fordm992001|Fordm992001]] ([[User talk:Fordm992001|talk]]) 00:47, 26 February 2017 (UTC) |
I personally recognize google doodles as a high praise, most definitely worthy of report. Thank you. [[User:Fordm992001|Fordm992001]] ([[User talk:Fordm992001|talk]]) 00:47, 26 February 2017 (UTC) |
||
:I think so. There are few enough of them as to be worthy of note - especially for less-well-known figures such as Lewis. -- |
:I think so. There are few enough of them as to be worthy of note - especially for less-well-known figures such as Lewis. --<font face="Old English Text MT">[[User:Ser Amantio di Nicolao|Ser Amantio di Nicolao]]</font><sup>[[User_talk:Ser Amantio di Nicolao|''Che dicono a Signa?'']]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ser Amantio di Nicolao|'''Lo dicono a Signa.''']]</sub> 20:20, 26 February 2017 (UTC) |
||
== Semi-protected edit request on 26 February 2017 == |
== Semi-protected edit request on 26 February 2017 == |