Talk:Andrew Cuomo: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:33, 19 January 2022

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Andrew Cuomo article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 90 days

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Politics and Government B‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as High-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

New York (state) B‑class Top‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

New York City B‑class High‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Politics: American B‑class High‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as High-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Law B‑class Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Urban studies and planning B‑class Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 7 times. The weeks in which this happened:

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

https://www.axios.com/cnn-chris-cuomo-andrew-brother-new-york-07f32b80-e298-4607-aa95-d044d1deeb55.html

Section sizes

Section size for Andrew Cuomo (52 sections)
Section name	Byte count	Section total
(Top)	18,441	18,441
Early life and education	4,305	4,305
Early career	3,037	3,037
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development	9,481	9,481
Private sector	564	564
2002 New York gubernatorial election	1,782	1,782
New York attorney general	32	9,088
Election	2,250	2,250
Tenure	15	6,806
Police surveillance, 2007	1,906	1,906
Student loan inquiry, 2007	1,376	1,376
Usenet, 2008	1,919	1,919
2008 Obama remarks	1,010	1,010
Corruption and fraud investigations, 2009	580	580
Consideration for U.S. Senate appointment	3,091	3,091
Gubernatorial elections	30	17,241
2010	4,674	4,674
2014	4,369	4,369
2018	5,198	5,198
2022	2,970	2,970
Governor of New York (2011–2021)	15,380	91,333
Appointee donations controversy	2,609	2,609
Corporate incentives	3,300	3,300
COVID-19 pandemic response	16,717	16,717
Criminal justice	2,488	2,488
Environment	905	905
Gun control and "gravity knives"	7,221	7,221
Hurricane Sandy	3,067	3,067
Hydraulic fracturing	2,592	2,592
Israel	236	236
Marijuana legalization	3,483	3,483
New York City Subway	2,893	2,893
Public college and university tuition	2,053	2,053
Public employees	1,503	1,503
Public housing	1,536	1,536
Remarks about right-wing conservatives	4,567	4,567
Same-sex marriage	5,600	5,600
Start-Up NY	1,471	1,471
Taxes	3,335	3,335
Voting rights	803	803
Women's issues and abortion	9,574	9,574
Controversies	56	63,122
Official corruption	13,306	13,306
COVID-19 nursing home deaths	12,397	12,397
Sexual harassment allegations and resignation	37,363	37,363
Post-gubernatorial career	3,726	3,726
Electoral history	66	66
Personal life	6,616	6,616
Published works	1,007	1,007
References	30	30
Further reading	156	156
External links	3,783	3,783
Total	236,869	236,869

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Jordan Davidson (June 15, 2021). "Wikipedia's Quiet, Big-Tech-Funded Grip On Internet Knowledge Gives It Too Much Power". The Federalist (website). Retrieved June 16, 2021. In one recent example, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who is under federal and state investigation for mishandling the COVID-19 pandemic and growing list of scandals, is described on his Wikipedia page in a positive light while Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a potential GOP frontrunner for the 2024 presidential election, is painted as a partisan hack who ignored the science.

RfC for lead image

The following discussion is an archived record of a request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Responding to an ANRFC request, I find that there is no consensus. Editors express concerns with all of the images present: some opine that image 5 is "grainy" and has an "abysmal resolution"; others object that image 3 is backlit, outdated, and unflattering, while still others criticize image 7's background or image 6's shadow. (Other images gained little or no support at all.) As a closer, I can find no policy basis to favor or discount any of these arguments: the selection of a lead image is fundamentally a question of aesthetic opinion on which reasonable minds can and do disagree. Given the numerical deadlock between images 5 and 3, as well as the lack of majority support for any option, I cannot divine a consensus from this discussion, and the status quo should thus hold.

If there is a desire to litigate this matter further, the following observations may prove helpful. First, the large number of suggestions prevented consensus from coalescing around any particular image. If this matter is to be discussed again in the future, it would be prudent to prevent the presentation of a ponderous proliferation of pictures. Second, the participants seem to share a general antipathy toward all of the images discussed: HAL333's comment that "none of these are great" is typical. If another, higher-quality image can be obtained (perhaps some sort of official photograph), it would be more likely to gain consensus.

I note for the record that I discounted a comment supporting "Option 4 or 5, even though they're a bit off, because so is he", for obvious reasons. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:30, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Which of the following images should be used in the infobox? Mover of molehills (talk) 01:29, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Option One (1)
Option Two (2)
Option Three (3)
Option Four (4)
Option Five (5)*
Option Six (6)
Option Seven (7)

* This is the image currently used in the article's infobox as of 8/28/21.

Notified: Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography, Wikipedia:WikiProject Politics/American politics, Wikipedia:WikiProject New York. ––FormalDude talk 21:44, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notified: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Urban studies and planning. ––FormalDude talk 00:27, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Option 6. I feel like this one captures his age better (option 3 is pretty old), and has high resolution. Mover of molehills (talk) 13:40, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Option Five, the current one, where he's smiling. He has an odd look in most of the others. Ann Teak (talk)
Option 3 strikes a middle ground between his smiling and frowning facial expressions in the other images. I think this is the most neutral facial expression, and therefore the best option. (Option 1 would be my second choice.) ––FormalDude talk 01:48, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Option 6 is my real second choice, since option 1 is just a larger version of option 3. ––FormalDude talk 12:45, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Option 5: The rest just look odd and are either a grimace or a smug shrug. The one of him smiling is the best. Seloloving (talk) 02:27, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Option 3: I think that the current image looks grainy and weird from my screen (Likely due to the low resolution), option 1 and 4 seems way to zoomed out, and the expressions in 2 and 6 seems a bit weird Justi yaya 08:37, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Option 3. While his facial expression looks a bit more normal in 5, 5 is really grainy and low def (if there was a higher definition version of 5 I would prefer it the most). 2 is just a bit odd, and you can't really see his face that well behind the shadow in 6. 3 is just the least-worst option. Option 7 was just added, I like this one the most actually. Not sure how well this RfC will work as images have trickled in after people have !voted. ‑‑Volteer1 (talk) 07:34, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
3 or 5 as decent close-up images of his face; 1 is tilted, 2 is a weird facial expression and 6 is too much in shadow. -sche (talk) 19:35, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
5 is grainy but probably still the best of these. (Option 7, which was recently added, would be OK if the distracting background could be removed.) Travellers & Tinkers (talk) 22:59, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Option 6. This photo appears to be a recent photo and also is a higher resolution than the other photos. Though the shadow on the picture is not ideal, it appears to be the best of the suggested options. Jurisdicta (talk) 05:50, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Option 6 is from 2014, the most recent are Option 2 (2018), and Option 7 (2017). --BlueShirtz (talk) 00:37, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Option 5 as first choice, option 7 as second choice. Oppose 1 and 3 because he looks too pose-y and is looking somewhere else, oppose 2 cause of the saturation, oppose 4 cause of the zoom (too far away), and oppose 6 cause of the zoom (too close up). Option 5 and 7 both seem the most normal, but slightly prefer 5 because of the background (curtains instead of the subway). Some1 (talk) 00:10, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Option 7. It looks better and has a good resolution. Sea Ane (talk) 21:13, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Option 4 or 5 They seem to be more captivating and represents a jovial expression. Idealigic (talk) 06:28, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Option 6 - Good resolution, appears to be more recent and looks less like a glamour shot than some of the other options. PraiseVivec (talk) 12:32, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Option 3. He's smiling, good portrait, it's a quality photo and high resolution. Option 4/5 is abysmal resolution, and the smile is a bit over the top for a portrait. Option 2 is atrocious, but fortunately it has no votes anyway. Alsee (talk) 01:09, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Option 3 - as he seems to have a serious close-up look. GoodDay (talk) 05:17, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Options 5 or 7. Option 3 is backlit and the others are even worse. Jonathunder (talk) 20:05, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Option 7 or 3 - Unlike Option 5 (the current image) this photo is more recent, of a higher camera quality, and is cropped in the same way as other lead images for articles about politicians. Also, he's still smiling in this photo too. Three is my second choice because its of a higher quality and he has a neutral expression on his face. BlueShirtz (talk) 00:32, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Current tally:

Option Five has 7 !votes

Option Three has 6 !votes

Option Seven has 4 !votes

Option Six has 3 !votes

Option Four has 1 !vote

Options One and Two have no !votes

It seems to be between Options Five and Three, with Options Six and Seven as popular second choices. ––FormalDude talk 04:24, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Option 3 This appears to be the best one. It's relatively good quality and straight on and he is making a neutral expression. I noticed 5 is the most popular, and I'm surprised since how bad quality it is. I think option 6 would be my 2nd option, it's just not as straight on as option 3. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 05:12, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Option 3 but none of these are great. Isn't there at least one high quality portrait released by his (former) office? ~ HAL333 17:14, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Option 4because it looks more stately and includes the state flag (adding context)Writethisway (talk) 16:26, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Option 4 or 5, even though they're a bit off, because so is he. CameeliousCase (talk) 00:43, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Is this a serious question? Surely there must be a better photo than the original proposal. Ann Teak (talk)

I think we need a couple more suitable images here that we can vote on in order for this to be a good RfC. ––FormalDude talk 01:05, 29 August 2021 (UTC) (Summoned by bot)[reply]
- Updated the RfC. Courtesy ping Mover of molehills, Ann Teak. ––FormalDude talk 01:37, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Pinging those who participated in the RfC and may not be aware of the seventh option added: @Ann Teak, @Seloloving, @Justiyaya, @Mover of molehills. ––FormalDude talk 07:41, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
None of these are suitable. He should not have a smiling picture. 38.73.253.217 (talk) 04:03, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- There's several options where he's not smiling... ––FormalDude talk 05:33, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Or looking proud.38.73.253.217 (talk) 00:55, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These all seem to be unacceptable snapshots captured at random. What about an official headshot? SPECIFICO talk 23:03, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to provide any additionally suitable images from commons for discussion in the RfC. ––FormalDude talk 23:13, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are there any official portraits or mugshots of him in the public domain? Travellers & Tinkers (talk) 18:27, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This may be another suitable option:
Option 8?
––FormalDude talk 23:18, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'd vote for it --BlueShirtz (talk) 00:40, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Right? He's definitely got the nicest suit on in this one. ––FormalDude talk 04:30, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Recent misdemeanor charge/complaint against Cuomo

Regarding the recent misdemeanor complaint against Cuomo (https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/28/nyregion/cuomo-forcible-touching-complaint.html), how should we word it so an edit dispute doesn't break out? Or should we put it in there at all? Unknown0124 (talk) 23:24, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The current wording is fine: "On October 28, 2021, a spokesman for the state court system announced that Cuomo would be charged with misdemeanor "Sex Crime" in the Albany City Court." While there is always room for improvement, I don't see why this should promote an edit war. TFD (talk) 23:34, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I didn't even notice it was in there. Next time I should look harder. Unknown0124 (talk) 00:38, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Longest-tenured governor

I am not a native English speaking editor, but the sentence "At the time of his resignation, he was the longest-tenured governor in the United States" made me thinking what it really mean, so I decided to reword it better. However I do not have a source for the date I used for the beginning date (January 7, 2019), it is my own research, but there was no source before my edit either. I found that before him Butch Otter had this record, who served continuously from January 1, 2007. So please double check it! Thanks! JSoos (talk) 19:16, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mateodepalacios: I understand, it is much easier to delete a relevant statement with error, than correct it. So I was wrong, before him it was not Otter but Gary Herbert, so the beginning date is 4 January 2021. Still I can not put reference, only the snapshot of the list of current governors article proves it (Ordered Inauguration column shows it):

JSoos (talk) 18:23, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Criminal Case Against Cuomo Has Been Dropped

Please include this in the article that Albany County District Attorney David Soares has dismissed a criminal complaint he filed against Cuomo and also declined to pursue other potential criminal charges.2601:447:4000:220:10FA:BF4E:A9AB:3CFE (talk) 22:24, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 4 January 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

On October 28, 2021, a spokesman for the state court system announced that Cuomo would be charged with a misdemeanor sex crime in the Albany City Court.^[1]

On October 28, 2021, a spokesman for the state court system announced that Cuomo would be charged with a misdemeanor sex crime in the Albany City Court.^[2] The office of Albany County Sheriff Craig Apple would file a criminal complaint against Cuomo related to Brittany Commisso’s groping allegation.^[3] However, on January 4, 2022, Albany County District Attorney David Soares declined to prosecute Cuomo and asked a judge to dismiss the complaint, stating that "While we found the complainant in this case cooperative and credible, after review of all the available evidence, we have concluded that we cannot meet our burden at trial.”^[4] Soares also stated that his office considered other potential criminal charges, but none fit the allegations.^[4] 2601:447:4000:220:1959:7952:E4E3:A8B3 (talk) 22:31, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done 🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk)} 19:38, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 16 January 2022

It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Andrew Cuomo. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

On December 28, the Westchester County district attorney declined to issue criminal charges from the credible allegations, citing "statutory requirements" of New York's laws.^[5] ^[6]

On December 28, the Westchester County district attorney declined to issue criminal charges from the credible allegations, citing "statutory requirements" of New York's laws.^[7] ^[8] On January 7, 2022, a judge dismissed a criminal complaint which was filed against Cuomo.^[9] 2601:447:4000:220:607E:7564:26E9:46DF (talk) 22:21, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Criminal Case Against Cuomo has now been dropped at the judicial level

Please include this.2601:447:4000:220:4C66:79D1:73CA:713A (talk) 01:33, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

^ Dienst, Jonathan (2021-10-28). "Andrew Cuomo Charged With Misdemeanor 'Sex Crime', Court Spokesman Says". WNBC. Retrieved 2021-10-28.
^ Dienst, Jonathan (2021-10-28). "Andrew Cuomo Charged With Misdemeanor 'Sex Crime', Court Spokesman Says". WNBC. Retrieved 2021-10-28.
^ Hill, Michael (October 28, 2021). "Cuomo accused of groping woman, a misdemeanor sex crime". Associated Press. Retrieved January 4, 2022.
^ ^a ^b Hill, Michael; Villeneuve, Marina (January 4, 2021). "Prosecutor drops groping charge against former NY Gov. Cuomo". Associated Press. Retrieved January 4, 2022.
^ News, A. B. C. "Westchester DA declines to pursue charges against former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo". ABC News. Retrieved 2021-12-29. {{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)
^ Scott, Eugene (December 29, 2021). "Westchester DA won't charge Andrew Cuomo despite 'credible' allegations". The Washington Post. Retrieved December 29, 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
^ News, A. B. C. "Westchester DA declines to pursue charges against former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo". ABC News. Retrieved 2021-12-29. {{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)
^ Scott, Eugene (December 29, 2021). "Westchester DA won't charge Andrew Cuomo despite 'credible' allegations". The Washington Post. Retrieved December 29, 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
^ Villeneuve, Marina; Hill, Michael (January 7, 2022). "Judge dismisses sole criminal charge against Andrew Cuomo". Associated Press. Retrieved January 16, 2022.

[1] Dienst, Jonathan (2021-10-28). "Andrew Cuomo Charged With Misdemeanor 'Sex Crime', Court Spokesman Says". WNBC. Retrieved 2021-10-28.

[2] Dienst, Jonathan (2021-10-28). "Andrew Cuomo Charged With Misdemeanor 'Sex Crime', Court Spokesman Says". WNBC. Retrieved 2021-10-28.

[3] Hill, Michael (October 28, 2021). "Cuomo accused of groping woman, a misdemeanor sex crime". Associated Press. Retrieved January 4, 2022.

[casedropped-4] Hill, Michael; Villeneuve, Marina (January 4, 2021). "Prosecutor drops groping charge against former NY Gov. Cuomo". Associated Press. Retrieved January 4, 2022.

[5] News, A. B. C. "Westchester DA declines to pursue charges against former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo". ABC News. Retrieved 2021-12-29. {{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)

[6] Scott, Eugene (December 29, 2021). "Westchester DA won't charge Andrew Cuomo despite 'credible' allegations". The Washington Post. Retrieved December 29, 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)

[7] News, A. B. C. "Westchester DA declines to pursue charges against former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo". ABC News. Retrieved 2021-12-29. {{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)

[8] Scott, Eugene (December 29, 2021). "Westchester DA won't charge Andrew Cuomo despite 'credible' allegations". The Washington Post. Retrieved December 29, 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)

[9] Villeneuve, Marina; Hill, Michael (January 7, 2022). "Judge dismisses sole criminal charge against Andrew Cuomo". Associated Press. Retrieved January 16, 2022.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

@@ Line 142: / Line 142: @@
 On December 28, the Westchester County district attorney declined to issue criminal charges from the credible allegations, citing "statutory requirements" of New York's laws.<ref>{{Cite web|last=News|first=A. B. C.|title=Westchester DA declines to pursue charges against former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo|url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/westchester-da-declines-pursue-charges-gov-cuomo/story?id=81975395|access-date=2021-12-29|website=ABC News|language=en}}</ref> <ref>{{Cite web|last=Scott|first=Eugene|date=December 29, 2021|title=Westchester DA won’t charge Andrew Cuomo despite ‘credible’ allegations|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/12/28/westchester-da-wont-charge-andrew-cuomo-despite-credible-allegations/|url-status=live|access-date=December 29, 2021|website=The Washington Post}}</ref> On January 7, 2022, a judge dismissed a criminal complaint which was filed against Cuomo.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://apnews.com/article/business-new-york-andrew-cuomo-albany-david-soares-7fb427f8bba47de711fbd556d4e5c782#:~:text=Hans%20Pennink%2CPool)-,ALBANY%2C%20N.Y.,drove%20former%20New%20York%20Gov.&text=The%20move%20had%20been%20expected,and%20intended%20to%20drop%20it.|title=Judge dismisses sole criminal charge against Andrew Cuomo|first1=Marina|last1=Villeneuve|first2=Michael|last2=Hill|publisher=Associated Press|date=January 7, 2022|accessdate=January 16, 2022}}</ref> [[Special:Contributions/2601:447:4000:220:607E:7564:26E9:46DF|2601:447:4000:220:607E:7564:26E9:46DF]] ([[User talk:2601:447:4000:220:607E:7564:26E9:46DF|talk]]) 22:21, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
+==The Criminal Case Against Cuomo has now been dropped at the judicial level==
+Please include this.[[Special:Contributions/2601:447:4000:220:4C66:79D1:73CA:713A|2601:447:4000:220:4C66:79D1:73CA:713A]] ([[User talk:2601:447:4000:220:4C66:79D1:73CA:713A|talk]]) 01:33, 19 January 2022 (UTC)