Permissive society: Difference between revisions
m Reverted edits by 188.39.48.166 (talk) to last version by Adam9389 |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
During the 1970s and 1980s, some British sociologists took a more sceptical approach to the question of the sixties 'permissive society', noting that it actually resulted in only partial and amended regulation of previously illegal and or stigmatised social activities. For example, the [[Sexual Offences Act 1967]] decriminalised homosexuality, but at an unequal age of consent, twenty one (although it was subsequently reduced to eighteen (1994) and finally, age of consent equality at sixteen (2002), additionally, the 1967 act only decriminalised homosexuality under limited circumstances. Similarly, the Abortion Act 1967 did not allow free access to abortion for women who needed it, but required them to obtain medical permission and imposed time limits on terminations of pregnancy. Furthermore, as with the case of [[cannabis]] decriminalisation, some instances of liberalised social attitudes were not met with legislative change. It is therefore important to note that the extent of 'permissiveness' that occurred in the sixties may have been overstated.<ref>National Deviancy Conference (ed) ''Permissiveness and Control: The Fate of the Sixties Legislation:'' London: Macmilan: 1980</ref><ref>Tim Newburn: ''Permission and Regulation: Morals in Postwar Britain'': London: Routledge: 1992</ref> Some would argue that in the case of [[LGBT rights]] in the United Kingdom, Western Europe, Canada and New Zealand, the initial changes were only a prelude to further periods of legislative change: [[anti-discrimination law]]s, [[same sex marriage]] or [[civil unions]] and [[gay adoption]] have all occurred since the initial decriminalisation of homosexuality. |
During the 1970s and 1980s, some British sociologists took a more sceptical approach to the question of the sixties 'permissive society', noting that it actually resulted in only partial and amended regulation of previously illegal and or stigmatised social activities. For example, the [[Sexual Offences Act 1967]] decriminalised homosexuality, but at an unequal age of consent, twenty one (although it was subsequently reduced to eighteen (1994) and finally, age of consent equality at sixteen (2002), additionally, the 1967 act only decriminalised homosexuality under limited circumstances. Similarly, the Abortion Act 1967 did not allow free access to abortion for women who needed it, but required them to obtain medical permission and imposed time limits on terminations of pregnancy. Furthermore, as with the case of [[cannabis]] decriminalisation, some instances of liberalised social attitudes were not met with legislative change. It is therefore important to note that the extent of 'permissiveness' that occurred in the sixties may have been overstated.<ref>National Deviancy Conference (ed) ''Permissiveness and Control: The Fate of the Sixties Legislation:'' London: Macmilan: 1980</ref><ref>Tim Newburn: ''Permission and Regulation: Morals in Postwar Britain'': London: Routledge: 1992</ref> Some would argue that in the case of [[LGBT rights]] in the United Kingdom, Western Europe, Canada and New Zealand, the initial changes were only a prelude to further periods of legislative change: [[anti-discrimination law]]s, [[same sex marriage]] or [[civil unions]] and [[gay adoption]] have all occurred since the initial decriminalisation of homosexuality. |
||
As well as this, there have been further periods of social reformist legislation that have not similarly been described as evidence of a 'permissive |
As well as this, there have been further periods of social reformist legislation that have not similarly been described as evidence of a 'permissive spanners.' These include the passage of legislation that decriminalised [[prostitution in Australia]] and [[prostitution in New Zealand]], as well as the decriminalisation of [[medical marijuana]] across many US states. The term appears to have been historicised. |
||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
Revision as of 20:44, 5 October 2013
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
No issues specified. Please specify issues, or remove this template. |
A permissive society is a society where social norms are becoming increasingly liberal.[1] This usually accompanies a change in what is considered deviant. While typically preserving the rule "do not harm others" (harm principle/non-aggression principle), a permissive society would have few other moral or legal codes (no victimless crimes, for example). Aspects that often change as a society becomes more permissive:
- Sexual freedom increases. This includes the freedom to take part in sexual activities which were previously considered unacceptable or even criminalized, such as BDSM, fetishes and homosexuality. Freedom to view violent and sexual material including movies, music, art and literature increases, and censorship of these and other arts decreases.
- The power of religious groups subsides, often accompanied by a rising secularism.
The most cited example is the social revolution and sexual revolution of the 1960s in Europe and America, giving rise to new attitudes toward artistic freedom, abortion rights, homosexuality, drug liberalization, and capital punishment. Also commonly mentioned is the general loosening of Britain's former adherence to Victorian values.
Though some view permissiveness as a positive, social conservatives claim that it destroys the moral and sociocultural structures necessary for a civilized and valid society. For example, lower divorce rates, decreasing the incidence of sexually transmitted diseases, and controlling crime are all desirable.
Others answer that these problems are themselves outcomes of the very repressiveness that seeks to eliminate them, where citizens thinking, speaking, and acting freely have contributed to a society where freethinkers thrive, without having to fear repression through intolerance.
During the 1970s and 1980s, some British sociologists took a more sceptical approach to the question of the sixties 'permissive society', noting that it actually resulted in only partial and amended regulation of previously illegal and or stigmatised social activities. For example, the Sexual Offences Act 1967 decriminalised homosexuality, but at an unequal age of consent, twenty one (although it was subsequently reduced to eighteen (1994) and finally, age of consent equality at sixteen (2002), additionally, the 1967 act only decriminalised homosexuality under limited circumstances. Similarly, the Abortion Act 1967 did not allow free access to abortion for women who needed it, but required them to obtain medical permission and imposed time limits on terminations of pregnancy. Furthermore, as with the case of cannabis decriminalisation, some instances of liberalised social attitudes were not met with legislative change. It is therefore important to note that the extent of 'permissiveness' that occurred in the sixties may have been overstated.[2][3] Some would argue that in the case of LGBT rights in the United Kingdom, Western Europe, Canada and New Zealand, the initial changes were only a prelude to further periods of legislative change: anti-discrimination laws, same sex marriage or civil unions and gay adoption have all occurred since the initial decriminalisation of homosexuality.
As well as this, there have been further periods of social reformist legislation that have not similarly been described as evidence of a 'permissive spanners.' These include the passage of legislation that decriminalised prostitution in Australia and prostitution in New Zealand, as well as the decriminalisation of medical marijuana across many US states. The term appears to have been historicised.
See also
References
- ^ "The Permissive Society: America, 1941-1965" by Alan Petigny
- ^ National Deviancy Conference (ed) Permissiveness and Control: The Fate of the Sixties Legislation: London: Macmilan: 1980
- ^ Tim Newburn: Permission and Regulation: Morals in Postwar Britain: London: Routledge: 1992
Further reading
Alan Petigny, The Permissive Society, America, 1941–1965 (University of Florida, 2009; ISBN 978-0-521-88896-7)
 | This sociology-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |