Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Christopher Hitchens: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Former user 2 (talk | contribs)
Counterpunch is not a source that should be used on WP:BLP
why not? It's used here to substantiate the claim that some question Hitchens based on his drinking; Counterpunch is a fine source for that sort of claim.
Line 122: Line 122:
In 2003 he wrote that his daily intake of alcohol was enough "to kill or stun the average mule." Noting that his doctor expressed amazement at his alcohol consumption, Hitchens wrote that "in my time I've met more old drunks than old doctors." He noted that many great writers "did some of their finest work when blotto, smashed, polluted, shitfaced, squiffy, whiffled, and three sheets to the wind."<ref>Christopher Hitchens, "Living Proof," ''Vanity Fair'' (March 2003).</ref> In 1999 he described himself to reporter Michael Skube as "an alcoholic and a chain smoker."<ref>Michael Skube, "A leftist among friends in Dunwoody," ''Atlanta Journal and Constitution'' (30 May 1999) p. 12K.</ref>
In 2003 he wrote that his daily intake of alcohol was enough "to kill or stun the average mule." Noting that his doctor expressed amazement at his alcohol consumption, Hitchens wrote that "in my time I've met more old drunks than old doctors." He noted that many great writers "did some of their finest work when blotto, smashed, polluted, shitfaced, squiffy, whiffled, and three sheets to the wind."<ref>Christopher Hitchens, "Living Proof," ''Vanity Fair'' (March 2003).</ref> In 1999 he described himself to reporter Michael Skube as "an alcoholic and a chain smoker."<ref>Michael Skube, "A leftist among friends in Dunwoody," ''Atlanta Journal and Constitution'' (30 May 1999) p. 12K.</ref>


Hitchens has been criticized for his heavy and public use of alcohol. Christopher Reed in the London ''Observer'' observed that "Hitchens, who found himself labelled 'the barstool bombardier' for his support of war against Iraq, has for decades impressed his friends with his capacity both for alcohol and work, but as time passes - he is 54 in April - the question is whether his drinking is 'a master or a servant'."<ref>Christopher Reed, "Battle of the bottle divides columnists," ''The Observer'' (2 March 2003) p. 26.</ref> When Hitchens confronted MP [[George Galloway]] outside the U.S. [[Senate]], Galloway ignored his questions and taunted, "Your hands are shaking. You badly need another drink."[http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1486417,00.html] His wife [[Carol Blue]] acknowledged to writer Ian Parker, "Once in a while, it seems like he might be drunk. Aside from that, even though he's obviously an alcoholic, he functions at a really high level and he doesn't act like a drunk, so the only reason it's a bad thing is it's taking out his liver, presumably. It would be a drag for Henry Kissinger to live to a hundred and Christopher to keel over next year." Hitchens told Parker that Mel Gibson's .12 blood-alcohol level at the time of his arrest in Malibu is "as sober as you'd ever want to be," but he insisted, "I know what I'm doing with it. And I can time it. It's a self-medicating thing."<ref>Ian Parker, "He Knew He Was Right," ''The New Yorker'' (16 October 2006).</ref>
Hitchens has been criticized for his heavy and public use of alcohol, which causes some to question his opinions.[http://www.counterpunch.org/cockburn02192003.html] Christopher Reed in the London ''Observer'' observed that "Hitchens, who found himself labelled 'the barstool bombardier' for his support of war against Iraq, has for decades impressed his friends with his capacity both for alcohol and work, but as time passes - he is 54 in April - the question is whether his drinking is 'a master or a servant'."<ref>Christopher Reed, "Battle of the bottle divides columnists," ''The Observer'' (2 March 2003) p. 26.</ref> When Hitchens confronted MP [[George Galloway]] outside the U.S. [[Senate]], Galloway ignored his questions and taunted, "Your hands are shaking. You badly need another drink."[http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1486417,00.html] His wife [[Carol Blue]] acknowledged to writer Ian Parker, "Once in a while, it seems like he might be drunk. Aside from that, even though he's obviously an alcoholic, he functions at a really high level and he doesn't act like a drunk, so the only reason it's a bad thing is it's taking out his liver, presumably. It would be a drag for Henry Kissinger to live to a hundred and Christopher to keel over next year." Hitchens told Parker that Mel Gibson's .12 blood-alcohol level at the time of his arrest in Malibu is "as sober as you'd ever want to be," but he insisted, "I know what I'm doing with it. And I can time it. It's a self-medicating thing."<ref>Ian Parker, "He Knew He Was Right," ''The New Yorker'' (16 October 2006).</ref>


== Personal ==
== Personal ==

Revision as of 19:49, 6 March 2007

Christopher Hitchens

Christopher Eric Hitchens (born in Portsmouth, England, April 13, 1949) is an author, journalist and literary critic. Currently living in Washington, D.C., he has been a columnist at Vanity Fair, The Nation and Slate; additionally, he is an occasional contributor to many other publications. Most recently he has appeared regularly in the Wall Street Journal.

Hitchens is known for his iconoclasm, anti-clericalism, atheism, antitheism, anti-fascism and anti-monarchism. He is also noted for his acerbic wit and his noisy departure from the Anglo-American political left. He was formerly a Trotskyist and a fixture in the left wing publications of Britain and America. But a series of disagreements beginning in the early 1990s led to his resignation from The Nation shortly after the September 11, 2001, attacks.

While Hitchens' idiosyncratic ideas and positions preclude easy classification, he is a vociferous critic of what he describes as "fascism with an Islamic face," and he is sometimes described as a "neoconservative". Hitchens describes himself as "on the same side as the neo-conservatives",[1] and refers to his "temporary neocon allies".[2]

Hitchens no longer considers himself a Trotskyist or even a socialist; yet he maintains that his political views have not changed significantly. He points out that, throughout his career, he has been both an atheist and an antitheist, and that he has always remained a believer in the Enlightenment values of secularism, humanism and reason; he is an Honorary Associate of the National Secular Society.

Education

Hitchens was educated at The Leys School, Cambridge, and Balliol College, Oxford, where he took a third class degree in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics.

Political views

Early career

Hitchens became a Trotskyist during his years as a student at Oxford University, where he was tutored by Steven Lukes. He wrote for the magazine International Socialism, which was published by the International Socialists, the forerunners of today's British Socialist Workers Party. This group was broadly Trotskyist but differed from more orthodox Trotskyist groups in its refusal to defend communist states as "workers' states". This was symbolized in their slogan "Neither Washington nor Moscow but International Socialism". Hitchens left Oxford with a third class degree and in the 1970s went on to work for the New Statesman, where he became friends with, amongst others, Martin Amis and Ian McEwan. At the New Statesman he became known as an aggressive left-winger, stridently attacking targets such as Henry Kissinger, the Vietnam War and the Roman Catholic Church. After emigrating to the United States in 1981, Hitchens wrote for The Nation. While at The Nation he penned vociferous critiques of Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush and American foreign policy in South and Central America.

Hitchens criticized the first Gulf War, claiming — in an essay reprinted in For the Sake of Argument— that the Bush administration lured Saddam Hussein into the war. This position was called into question years later, during a debate in September of 2005, as being inconsistent with Hitchens' later anti-Saddam views. Hitchens answered that during the post-war period, when he spent time among the largely pro-American Iraqi Kurds, he came to believe that the responsibility for the crisis lay primarily with Saddam Hussein.

"Theocratic fascism" and early disagreements with the Left

Hitchens was deeply shocked by the February 14, 1989, fatwa against his longtime friend Salman Rushdie. He became increasingly concerned by the dangers of what he called "theocratic fascism" or "fascism with an Islamic face" (a play on Susan Sontag's phrase "fascism with a human face", referring to the declaration of martial law in Poland in 1981): radical Islamists who supported the fatwa against Rushdie and sought the recreation of the medieval caliphate. Hitchens is often credited with coining the term "Islamofascism", but this appears not to be the case, and Hitchens himself denies it. Malise Ruthven appears to be the first to have used the term in an article in The Independent on 8 September 1990.[3]

Hitchens did use the term "Islamic Fascism" for an article he wrote for The Nation, shortly after 9/11 (although the phrase is used earlier than that, e.g., in The Washington Post on 13 January 1979; it also appears to have been used by secularists in Turkey and Afghanistan to describe their opponents).

Hitchens also became increasingly disenchanted by the presidency of Bill Clinton, accusing him of being a rapist and a serial liar. Hitchens also claimed that the missile attacks by Clinton on Sudan was a war crime. The support of some on the left for Clinton alienated him further from the "soft left" in the United States. On the other hand, he became increasingly distanced from the "hard left" by their lack of support for Western intervention in Kosovo.

The years after the Rushdie fatwa also saw him looking for allies and friends. In the United States he became increasingly frustrated by what he saw as the "excuse making" of the multiculturalist left. At the same time, he was attracted to the foreign policy ideas of some on the Republican right, especially the neoconservative group that included Paul Wolfowitz, with whom he became friends. Around this time, he also befriended the Iraqi dissident and businessman Ahmed Chalabi.

Post-9/11

After 9/11 his stance hardened, and he has strongly supported US military actions in Afghanistan and Iraq, particularly in his "Fighting Words" columns in Slate. Hitchens had been a long term contributor to the left-wing The Nation, where weekly he wrote his "Minority Report" column. After 9/11 he decided the magazine was making excuses on behalf of Islamist terrorism; in the following months he wrote articles increasingly at odds with his colleagues.

Following the 9/11 attacks, Hitchens and Noam Chomsky debated the nature of radical Islam and of the proper response to it. On September 24 and October 8, 2001, Hitchens wrote criticisms of Chomsky in The Nation [1][2]. Chomsky responded [3]. Hitchens issued a rebuttal to Chomsky[4] to which Chomsky again responded [5]. Approximately a year after the 9/11 attacks and his exchanges with Chomsky, Hitchens left The Nation in part because he believed its editors, its readers and contributors such as Chomsky considered John Ashcroft a bigger threat than Osama bin Laden [6]. This was one of the most highly-charged exchanges of letters in American journalism, involving Hitchens and Chomsky, as well as Katha Pollitt and Alexander Cockburn.

Where he stands now

Hitchens has said he no longer feels a part of the Left yet does not object to being called a "former" Trotskyist. However, his affection for Trotsky remains strong, and he says that his political and historical view of the world is still shaped by Marxist categories. In June 2004, Hitchens wrote an attack on Michael Moore in a review of Moore's latest film, Fahrenheit 9/11 [7].

Despite his many articles supporting the US invasion of Iraq, Hitchens made a brief return to The Nation just before the US presidential election and wrote that he was "slightly" for George W. Bush; shortly afterwards, Slate polled its staff on their positions on the candidates and mistakenly printed Hitchens' vote as pro-Kerry. Hitchens shifted his opinion to neutral, saying: "It's absurd for liberals to talk as if Kristallnacht is impending with Bush, and it's unwise and indecent for Republicans to equate Kerry with capitulation. There's no one to whom he can surrender, is there? I think that the nature of the jihadist enemy will decide things in the end" [8].

In the interview with journalist Johann Hari in 2004, in which Hitchens described himself as "on the same side as the neo-conservatives," he also states that he does not support George Bush per se (still less Dick Cheney or Donald Rumsfeld) but rather allies himself with those whom he sees as the "pure" neo-conservatives, especially Paul Wolfowitz. Although Hitchens finds himself defending Bush’s foreign policy, he has little admiration for the man himself and has criticized Bush's support of 'intelligent design'. As an anti-theist with a penchant for drinking, Hitchens was unimpressed by Bush's claim to have been "saved from drink by Jesus".

In March 2005, Hitchens supported further investigation into alleged voting irregularities in Ohio during the US presidential election, 2004.

In contributions to Vanity Fair, Hitchens criticised the Bush administration for its continued protection of Henry Kissinger, whom he views as complicit in the human rights abuses of Southern Cone military dictatorships during the 1970s. In 2001, he had published a book, The Trial of Henry Kissinger, on Kissinger's alleged role in the crimes of regimes in South America and Asia. In that book Hitchens would accuse Kissinger, first as National Security Advisor to President Nixon, and then as Secretary of State to the same president, of either actively participating in or tacitly condoning decisions that would lead to the massacre of Bengali civilians within East Pakistan.[9] He also asserts that Henry Kissinger, and by extension, the Ford administration, bore direct responsibility for the invasion of East Timor. The assertion is also made of Kissinger and the Nixon administration's responsibility for the coup that would eventually result in the overthrow of the Allende government, and installation of Augusto Pinochet as president of Chile.

In May 2005, George Galloway MP entered into an argument with Hitchens before giving evidence to the US Senate. Galloway called Hitchens a "drink-soaked former Trotskyist popinjay", "[s]ome of which", Hitchens contended in a column, "was unfair." A few days later, Hitchens wrote an article that attacked Galloway's political record, criticized his Senate testimony and made a case for Galloway's complicity in the Oil-for-Food scandal. Hitchens debated with Galloway in New York at Baruch College on 14 September, 2005 [10]. Both Galloway and Hitchens appeared on Real Time with Bill Maher on September 23, 2005.

In January 2006, Hitchens joined with four other individuals and four organizations, including the ACLU and Greenpeace, as plaintiffs in a lawsuit, ACLU v. NSA; challenging President Bush's warrantless domestic spying program; the lawsuit was filed by the ACLU [11] [12].

In February 2006, Hitchens helped organize a pro-Denmark rally outside the Danish Embassy in Washington, DC in response to the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy[13].

Key arguments

  • In a September 2005 article entitled "A War To Be Proud Of", he stated "Prison conditions at Abu Ghraib have improved markedly and dramatically since the arrival of Coalition troops in Baghdad."
  • In a June 5, 2006 article on the alleged killings of Iraqi civilians by US Marines in Haditha, he said, "all the glib talk about My Lai is so much propaganda and hot air."
  • In a variety of articles and interviews over a long period of time, he has asserted that British intelligence was correct in claiming that Saddam Hussein had attempted to buy uranium from Niger and that US envoy Joseph Wilson had been dishonest in his public denials of it. He has also defiantly pointed to discovered munitions in Iraq that violated U.N. Security Council Resolutions 686 and 687, the cease-fire agreements ending the 1991 Iraq-Kuwait conflict.

Today, Hitchens regards himself as a 'single-issue voter,' concerning himself with what he sees as the battle between the forces of secular democracy and those of theocratic fascism.

Despite his flirtation with neo-conservatism, Hitchens is sometimes seen as part of the self-styled "pro-liberation left," comprising left-leaning thinkers who support OIF. This informal grouping includes Nick Cohen, David Aaronovitch, Francis Wheen, Julie Burchill, and Michael Ignatieff (see Euston Manifesto). Neoconservatives of the last decade are hesitant to embrace Hitchens as one of their own, in part because of his harsh criticisms of Ronald Reagan, one of the heroes of the movement.

Regarding specific individuals

Mother Teresa

In 1992, Hitchens wrote an article[4] for the US left-wing journal The Nation in which he called Mother Teresa "The Ghoul of Calcutta". He later narrated and co-wrote Hell's Angel, a documentary broadcast 8 November 1994 on Channel 4 in Britain, and expanded his criticism in a 1995 book, The Missionary Position. He despised the unquestioning adoration of the vast majority of Western commentators, which he felt judged her by her reputation, not by her actions. His particular qualms were with what he perceived as her lack of treatment for people — particularly children — placed in her care; her strong religious views on contraception and abortion, which she described as "the biggest threat to world peace"[citation needed]; and her "acceptance" of poverty, which took the form of encouraging the poor to embrace their poverty.

Hitchens asserts that Mother Teresa behaved like a political opportunist who adopted the guise of a saint in order to raise money to spread an extreme and aggressive version of Catholicism. He also condemns her for using contributions to open convents in 150 countries rather than establishing a teaching hospital, the latter being what he implies donors expected her to do with their gifts.

He also criticized her for what he considers to be less-than-honorable financial dealings: the pursuit and acceptance of donations from third world dictators, large donations accepted from Charles Keating, who was later convicted of fraud, racketeering and conspiracy; and the allocation of these donations away from treatment and towards furthering what Hitchens considered "fundamentalist" views. Hitchens's writings have earned him the ire of Roman Catholics — Brent Bozell, for example, called Hitchens (and Aroup Chatterjee) "notoriously vicious anti-Catholics" ([14]).

During Mother Teresa's beatification process, Hitchens was called by the Vatican to argue the case against her. He gave his testimony in Washington. In this role he was fulfilling the role of what was previously known as the "Devil's Advocate", but the position was abolished under John Paul II. Hitchens has satirically referred to his work in the case as the person chosen "to represent the devil pro bono" ([15]).

Mel Gibson

During an arrest for driving under the influence, Mel Gibson asked the arresting officer if he was Jewish and said that "fucking Jews... The Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world."[5]

Hitchens criticised Gibson, stating, "Many conservative Jews, from David Horowitz to Rabbi Daniel Lapin, stuck up for Gibson as a man who defended family values against secular nihilism. I was just in the middle of writing a long and tedious essay, about how to tell a real anti-Semite from a person who too-loudly rejects the charge of anti-Semitism, when a near-perfect real-life example came to hand. That bad actor and worse director Mel Gibson, pulled over for the alleged offense of speeding and the further alleged offense of speeding under the influence, decided that he needed to demand of the arresting officer whether he was or was not Jewish and that he furthermore needed to impart the information that all the world's wars are begun by those of Semitic extraction. Call me thin-skinned if you must, but I think that this qualifies."[16]

Daniel Pipes

Hitchens severely criticized Daniel Pipes, upon Pipes' nomination to the U.S. government-sponsored U.S. Institute of Peace. Hitchens expressed "bafflement" at this appointment in a Slate essay entitled "Daniel Pipes is not a man of peace".[6] Hitchens claimed that Pipes "employs the fears and insecurities created by Islamic extremism to slander or misrepresent those who disagree with him," and that this contradicts the USIP's position as "a somewhat mild organization [...] devoted to the peaceful resolution of conflict." Hitchens concluded his opposition to Pipes' nomination by claiming that Pipes "confuses scholarship with propaganda" and pursues "petty vendettas with scant regard for objectivity."

Cindy Sheehan

In a column,[7] Hitchens states that Cindy Sheehan "has obviously taken a short course in the Michael Moore/Ramsey Clark school of Iraq analysis and has not succeeded in making it one atom more elegant or persuasive." Hitchens commented upon the allegation that Sheehan had told Nightline that her son "was killed for lies and for a PNAC Neo-Con agenda to benefit Israel. My son joined the Army to protect America, not Israel." However, Hitchens used the alleged statement to denounce Sheehan for allegedly positing a "Jewish cabal" and for attracting the support of David Duke.

International journalism

Hitchens spent part of his early career as a foreign correspondent in Cyprus. In the past several years, he has continued journeying to and writing essay-style correspondence pieces from a variety of locales, including Iraq, Iran, North Korea, Chad, Uganda and the Darfur region of Sudan.

Literary review

Hitchens regularly contributes literary reviews to the Atlantic Monthly. One of his books, Unacknowledged Legislation: Writers in the Public Sphere, is a collection of such works. Works he has recently reviewed include Shalimar the Clown by Salman Rushdie; Saturday by Ian McEwan; the D. J. Enright translation of In Search of Lost Time by Marcel Proust; the Alfred Appel Jr. annotated version of Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov (whom he named as on a par with James Joyce); and John Updike's Terrorist.

Television appearances

Hitchens has appeared on mainstream news programs with greater regularity in recent years. His appearances have often been characterized as overtly polemical, if not downright belligerent. While debating on the MSNBC program Hardball, Hitchens called an aide to Richard Armitage a "bitch." Similarly, while on Real Time with Bill Maher, he told Maher's audience to "fuck off," while giving them the finger after calling them frivolous for what he viewed as being too quick to applaud Maher's arguments . Hitchens has also appeared on the Daily Show a number of times. This includes an August 25 2005 appearance to promote his book about Thomas Jefferson; however, he was primarily engaged in a heated debate with Jon Stewart over the legitimacy of invading Iraq for the duration of his appearance. Hitchens was interviewed for the May 23, 2005 episode of Penn and Teller's Bullshit! in which he questioned the accuracy of Mother Theresa's public image, saying "it must be the most single successful emotional con job of the twentieth century.".

Christopher Hitchens described the Cyprus conflict in a 1989 episode of Frontiers.

Praise for and criticism of Hitchens

Hitchens is the subject of considerable praise as well as severe criticism. In September 2005, Hitchens was named as one of the "Top 100 Public Intellectuals" [17] by Foreign Policy and Britain's Prospect magazine. An online poll was held which ranked the 100 intellectuals, but the magazine noted that Hitchens' (#5), Chomsky's (#1), and Abdolkarim Soroush's (#15) rankings were partly due to supporters publicizing the vote. [18]

Prior to Hitchens' ideological shift, the American writer Gore Vidal had declared Hitchens his dauphin or heir.

Some criticize Hitchens for his frequent television appearances and claim that he is egotistic and has changed his political views for personal gain. Among his most severe critics is one-time colleague and friend Alexander Cockburn. Cockburn has frequently alluded to Hitchens's tendency to tipple. In a column for August 20, 2005 [19], Cockburn wrote:

"What a truly disgusting sack of shit Hitchens is [- a] guy who called Sid Blumenthal one of his best friends and then tried to have him thrown into prison for perjury; a guy who waited [until] his friend Edward Said was on his death bed before attacking him in the Atlantic Monthly; a guy who knows perfectly well the role Israel plays in US policy but who does not scruple to flail Cindy Sheehan as a LaRouchie and anti-Semite because, maybe, she dared mention the word Israel".

Hitchens's reply is:

In a recent effusion in the Huffington Post, Cindy Sheehan repeats the lie that her letter to ABC News Nightline was doctored, and says that a colleague of hers inserted the offending words in furtherance of his own "anti-Semitic" agenda. If she regards her own words as anti-Jewish, it's not up to me to correct her. I have not said that she is anti-Jewish, only that she shows a sinister ineptness in handling the wild idea of a PNAC/JINSA pro-Sharon secret government in the United States. [20].

There is speculation that Hitchens was the inspiration for Tom Wolfe's character Peter Fallow, in the 1987 novel The Bonfire of the Vanities, but others believe it to be Spy Magazine's "Ironman Nightlife Decathlete" Anthony Haden-Guest.

Accusations of anti-Catholicism

In April 2005 William A. Donohue of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights denounced Hitchens as an "anti-Catholic bigot". According to the Catholic League website, Hitchens admitted during a debate with Donohue:

"I might have to admit for debate purposes that when religion is attacked in this country that the Catholic Church comes in for little more than its fair share. I may say that I probably contributed somewhat to that and I am not ashamed of my part in it." [21]

UCLA Law Professor Stephen Bainbridge claimed that Hitchens has participated in "anti-Catholicism ... the last form of bigotry respectable amongst the elite".

Tom Piatak in The American Conservative magazine labels Hitchens an "anti-Catholic bigot":

A straightforward description of all Hitchens’s anti-Catholic outbursts would fill every page in this magazine—he recently argued, in essence, that Judge Roberts should not be confirmed to the Supreme Court because he is Catholic—but his most disgusting, and revealing, anti-Catholic spasm was his reaction to the death of John Paul II, a man he dismissed as "an elderly and querulous celibate, who came too late and who stayed too long."

However, Hitchens has criticised figures from every major religion. His attacks are not confined to Catholicism.

Use of alcohol

In 2003 he wrote that his daily intake of alcohol was enough "to kill or stun the average mule." Noting that his doctor expressed amazement at his alcohol consumption, Hitchens wrote that "in my time I've met more old drunks than old doctors." He noted that many great writers "did some of their finest work when blotto, smashed, polluted, shitfaced, squiffy, whiffled, and three sheets to the wind."[8] In 1999 he described himself to reporter Michael Skube as "an alcoholic and a chain smoker."[9]

Hitchens has been criticized for his heavy and public use of alcohol, which causes some to question his opinions.[22] Christopher Reed in the London Observer observed that "Hitchens, who found himself labelled 'the barstool bombardier' for his support of war against Iraq, has for decades impressed his friends with his capacity both for alcohol and work, but as time passes - he is 54 in April - the question is whether his drinking is 'a master or a servant'."[10] When Hitchens confronted MP George Galloway outside the U.S. Senate, Galloway ignored his questions and taunted, "Your hands are shaking. You badly need another drink."[23] His wife Carol Blue acknowledged to writer Ian Parker, "Once in a while, it seems like he might be drunk. Aside from that, even though he's obviously an alcoholic, he functions at a really high level and he doesn't act like a drunk, so the only reason it's a bad thing is it's taking out his liver, presumably. It would be a drag for Henry Kissinger to live to a hundred and Christopher to keel over next year." Hitchens told Parker that Mel Gibson's .12 blood-alcohol level at the time of his arrest in Malibu is "as sober as you'd ever want to be," but he insisted, "I know what I'm doing with it. And I can time it. It's a self-medicating thing."[11]

Personal

Family status

Was married to Eleni Meleagrou until June 1981. With her he had two children, Alexander and Sophia. He has one daughter, Antonia, with his current wife Carol Blue, whom he married in 1991.

Ethnic identity

In an article in the Guardian Unlimited on April 14, 2002, Hitchens says he is Jewish because Jewish descent is matrilineal. According to Hitchens, when his brother, Peter, took his new bride to meet their maternal grandmother, Dodo, who was then in her nineties, Dodo said, 'She's Jewish, isn't she?' and then announced: 'Well, I've got something to tell you. So are you'. She said that her real surname was Levin, not Lynn, and that her ancestors were Blumenthals from Poland [24]. According to The Observer of 14 April 2002, Christopher "insists that he is Jewish," and explored the issue in depth in the title essay of his book Prepared for the Worst.

In a column he wrote for the Los Angeles Times on February 9, 2006, Hitchens wrote, "my grandmother told me as an adult that both she and my mother were Jewish, and it sent me looking for my forebears on the German-Polish border". Hitchens's brother, Peter, disputes that the brothers have significant Jewish ancestry and is a Christian.

Relationship with brother, Peter Hitchens

Hitchens' younger brother by two-and-a-half years, Peter Hitchens, is also a journalist, author and critic. The brothers had a protracted falling-out after Peter wrote that Christopher had once joked that he "didn't care if the Red Army watered its horses at Hendon" (a suburb of London). Christopher denied having ever said this and broke off contact with his brother. He then referred to his brother as "an idiot" in a letter to Commentary, and the dispute spilled into other publications as well. However, after the birth of Peter's third child and some secret diplomacy by Peter, Christopher expressed a willingness to reconcile and to meet his new nephew; shortly thereafter Christopher and Peter gave several interviews together in which they said their personal disagreements had been resolved.

Bibliography

As sole author

  • 1984. Cyprus, Quartet, (revised editions as Hostage to History: Cyprus from the Ottomans to Kissinger, 1989 (Farrar Straus & Giroux) and 1997 (Verso))

As co-author or editor

As a contributor

Biographical

Hitchens's work

Others

Criticisms

References

  1. ^ Johann Hari, "In Enemy Territory: An Interview with Christopher Hitchens"", The Independent 23 Sept. 2004.
  2. ^ Christopher Hitchens, "The End of Fukuyama", Slate 1 Mar. 2006.
  3. ^ William Safire (2006). "Islamofascism Anyone?" The New York Times, Language section. October 1, 2006. Retrieved November 25, 2006.
  4. ^ Christopher Hitchens, "Minority Report", The Nation 13 April 1992.
  5. ^ "Gibson's Anti-Semitic Tirade — Alleged Cover Up". tmz.com. AOL. Retrieved 2006-07-29.
  6. ^ Christopher Hitchens, "Daniel Pipes is not a man of peace", Slate 11 Aug. 2003.
  7. ^ Christopher Hitchens, Cindy Sheehan's Sinister Piffle, Slate 15 Aug 2005.
  8. ^ Christopher Hitchens, "Living Proof," Vanity Fair (March 2003).
  9. ^ Michael Skube, "A leftist among friends in Dunwoody," Atlanta Journal and Constitution (30 May 1999) p. 12K.
  10. ^ Christopher Reed, "Battle of the bottle divides columnists," The Observer (2 March 2003) p. 26.
  11. ^ Ian Parker, "He Knew He Was Right," The New Yorker (16 October 2006).