Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Battle of Fornovo: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 64: Line 64:
Rodolfo Gonzaga, son of the Marquis of Mantua Ludovico III Gonzaga, was among the casualties. After the battle, Charles marched on into Lombardy and returned to France.{{sfn|Tucker|2010|p=361}}<ref>David Nicolle, ''Fornovo 1495 - France's bloody fighting retreat'', p. 43</ref>
Rodolfo Gonzaga, son of the Marquis of Mantua Ludovico III Gonzaga, was among the casualties. After the battle, Charles marched on into Lombardy and returned to France.{{sfn|Tucker|2010|p=361}}<ref>David Nicolle, ''Fornovo 1495 - France's bloody fighting retreat'', p. 43</ref>


Both parties strove to present themselves as the victors in the battle.{{sfn|Mallett|Shaw|2012|p=31}} Due to the recapture of all the booty looted by Charles' troops and his baggage train, the battle was reported in Venice as a victory, and was recorded and celebrated as such. But the French had won their battle, fighting off superior numbers and proceeding on their march.{{efn|The battle of Fornovo, by which Charles forced his way past the enemy who stood in his path, was not an indecisive action but a definite victory for France.{{sfn|Taylor|1921|p=14}}}}{{sfn|Taylor|1921|p=14}}{{sfn|Setton|1978|p=493–494}}{{sfn|Mallett|Shaw|2012|p=31}} The League took much higher casualties and could not prevent the French army from crossing Italian lands on its way back to France.{{sfn|Setton|1978|p=493–494}}
Both parties strove to present themselves as the victors in the battle.{{sfn|Mallett|Shaw|2012|p=31}} Due to the recapture of all the booty looted by Charles' troops and of his baggage train (among the trophies captured were Charles' personal helmet, two royal flags and the French king's personal collection of erotic images), the battle was reported in Venice as a victory, and was recorded and celebrated as such. But the French had won their battle, fighting off superior numbers and proceeding on their march.{{efn|The battle of Fornovo, by which Charles forced his way past the enemy who stood in his path, was not an indecisive action but a definite victory for France.{{sfn|Taylor|1921|p=14}}}}{{sfn|Taylor|1921|p=14}}{{sfn|Setton|1978|p=493–494}}{{sfn|Mallett|Shaw|2012|p=31}} The League took much higher casualties and could not prevent the French army from crossing Italian lands on its way back to France.{{sfn|Setton|1978|p=493–494}}


==Consequences==
==Consequences==

Revision as of 20:07, 23 November 2021

Battle of Fornovo
Part of the First Italian War
Date6 July 1495
Location
Result Disputed; French tactical victory[1]
Belligerents
 France League of Venice:
Republic of Venice
Duchy of Milan
Margraviate of Mantua
Commanders and leaders
Kingdom of France King Charles VIII Francesco Gonzaga, Marquess of Mantua[2]
Units involved
Stradioti
Strength
10,000–12,000 men[2][3][4][5] 14,000–20,000 men[2][3][6]
Casualties and losses
  • 2,000-3,500 killed and wounded[3][10][11][12]
  • The Battle of Fornovo took place 30 km (19 miles) southwest of the city of Parma on 6 July 1495. It was fought as King Charles VIII of France left Naples upon hearing the news of the grand coalition assembled against him. Despite the numerical advantage of their opponents, the French was able to break through and to march his army out of Italy, but were to forced to abandon the booty captured during the Italian campaign. The battle was nonetheless devoid of any strategic result as all of their conquests in the Italian Peninsula were abandoned. Fornovo was the first major pitched battle of the Italian Wars.

    Antecedents

    In the year 1495, Charles VIII was the youthful King of France, the most powerful state in medieval Europe. A dreamer who saw himself as the saviour of Christian Europe, he believed he could roll-back the ever-spreading tide of Ottoman Turkish conquest. As a base for his crusade, he was determined to seize Southern Italy. His claim on the Kingdom of Naples through his paternal grandmother, Marie of Anjou (1404–1463) presented such an opportunity.

    To have his hands free in Italy, Charles made various pacts with his neighbours, so they would not interfere. Henry VII of England was given cash,[13] Ferdinand II of Aragon was given Roussillon and Emperor Maximillian was given Artois and Franche-Comté. This handing out of territory could be regarded as a total lack of foresight on Charles' behalf but he was willing to take such steps to establish his Neapolitan base for his crusade.

    Italian armies of the late medieval period consisted of forces from the many independent towns of Italy. They were raised by establishing a contract, or "condotta", between the town leaders and the chiefs of mercenary bands, who came to be called Condottieri. Military doctrines and tactics destined to establish field supremacy were developed, as were methods of capture of wealthy prisoners for ransom, and astuces to minimize casualties. All of these were proven ineffective when the highly motivated standing armies of France and Spain invaded the Italian Peninsula.

    Campaign

    Charles VIII was on good terms with the two powers in northern Italy, Milan and Venice, and both had encouraged his claim over the Kingdom of Naples. Thus he assumed he would have their support when he moved against Alfonso II of Naples, especially as the rival claimant was Ferdinand II of Aragon, King of Spain. At the end of August 1494, in a lightning campaign, he used France's powerful modern army, reinforced by a large contingent of Swiss mercenaries, to sweep through Italy, his mobile field artillery train smashing into dust the tall towers of Italy's medieval castles. He was granted free passage through Milan, but was vigorously opposed by Florence, Pope Alexander VI, and Naples.

    On their way to Naples, the French defeated every army sent against them and were ruthless with any city that resisted the invasion. This shocked the Italians, who were accustomed to the relatively bloodless wars of the Condottieri.

    On 22 February 1495 Charles VIII and his chief commander, Louis II de La Trémoille, entered Naples almost without opposition. The speed and violence of the campaign left the Italians stunned. Realization struck them, especially the Venetians and the new Duke of Milan, Ludovico Sforza, that unless Charles was stopped Italy would soon just be another province of France. The Italian states rallied and on March 31 in Venice, the Holy League was proclaimed. The signatories were the Republic of Venice, the Duke of Milan, the Pope, the monarchs of Castile and Aragon, the King of England and the Holy Roman Emperor. The League engaged a veteran Condottiero, Francesco II of Gonzaga, Duke of Mantua to gather an army and expel the French from Italy. Upon hearing the news of the coalition assembled against him, Charles VIII left behind a garrisoning force in Naples and marched north with the remainder of his army, his artillery train and the considerable booty seized in the campaign thus far in order to join a smaller army under Louis II, Duke of Orléans in Piedmont in north-western Italy. While in Naples, the French army had been swept by an outbreak of syphilis and as the army moved north, it spread throughout Italy, where it became known as the "French Disease".

    Battle

    The Battle of Fornovo in the Gallery of Maps (Vatican Museums)

    On 27 June the Venetians and their allies established camp near Fornovo di Taro (44°41′N 10°06′E / 44.683°N 10.100°E / 44.683; 10.100), some 30 km southwest of Parma, to wait for the French. They would not have to wait long, but the Venetian Senate was not unanimous on fighting the French. Some members wanted to attack the rear guard of the French to try to seize their loot, while others cautioned that Italy was risking too much in this battle as this was just one French army and others could potentially be called upon.

    On July 4, Ercole d'Este, Duke of Ferrara, Charles' strongest ally in Italy, wrote to him and informed him that the Senate had not yet decided on an action. But Charles was anxious, seeing the enemy numbers growing, while he himself had no hope of reinforcements for the time being. When an effort to sway the undecided forces of Parma was thwarted by the Venetians, Charles instead sent a messenger to request free passage to return to France, but the Venetians replied that he would have to restore all his conquests before such could be considered. The messenger, having scouted the troops, reported back to Charles. The 40 soldiers Charles subsequently sent to reconnoiter were attacked and quickly routed by the Stradioti, Albanian mercenaries from the Balkans.[14]

    Two days later, on July 6, Charles decided to offer battle because the French were short of provisions. South of Milan, the path of his army of some 10,000 to 12,000 French and Swiss was blocked by Venetian and Mantuan troops under Gonzaga, whose strength is estimated between 14,000 and 20,000.[4] The League army took position on the right side of the Taro river and the French decided to keep to the left bank. Charles organized his army in battle groups. The first battle consisted of about 2,500 men and was led by Gian Giacomo Trivulzio. The second, the largest, was led by Charles himself. The final battle, about 1,400 men, was led by Francesco Secco. There was in addition a large infantry force of spearmen. The French artillery was arranged in front of the first line, as well as on the side of the Taro, protecting the second line.

    Melchiorre Trevisan promised the League soldiers the spoils of battle if they were victorious, igniting their combat ardor. Francesco Gonzaga divided his forces into nine lines. His battle plan was to distract the first and middle groups of the French with two lines while outflanking the rear. Once the French groups were disorganized, the rest of the Italian troops would attack.

    Instead of the usual feckless and nearly bloodless affair then common in Italian condottieri warfare, the French opened with an artillery bombardment, intending to kill as many of their opponents as possible.[15] Then they charged with their heavy cavalry, scattering the disordered Italian ranks.[10] The fight was perhaps more memorable for the ineffectiveness of artillery on either side, other than the psychological effect achieved by the French guns. One eyewitness estimated that fewer than 10 men were killed by cannon fire.[10]

    The battle began in the early afternoon with an exchange of artillery shells that generated more fear and disorder than casualties. The cavalry on the right wing led by Galeazzo Sanseverino attacked the French vanguard without suffering much damage from enemy artillery, perhaps also due to the conditions of the terrain that made the artillery difficult to maneuver. The French vanguard responded with a charge of the heavy knights led by Trivulzio. Both sides soon found themselves fighting on banks full of ditches, twigs and thorns. The French finally prevailed by sending the Swiss halberdiers against the Milanese cavalry, which was unable to fight on such an unfavorable terrain. In the meantime, Gonzaga's cavalry had attacked, followed by the infantry, the French center and there Rodolfo Gonzaga had fallen. Bernardino Fortebraccio's cavalry had bypassed the French rearguard together with Duodo's stradioti, attacking it on its side, but with a certain delay due to the unusually high water of the river. After an hour of fighting Gonzaga’s troops were repulsed, while the light cavalry of Fortebraccio, after a brief skirmish, together with the stradioti and part of the Venetian infantry, devoted themselves to plundering the enemy baggage. Fortebraccio, unable to reorganize his men, withdrew from the fray. The Count of Pitigliano conducted the last attacks with little effect. The Venetian administrators and Niccolò Orsini, who took advantage of the opportunity to free himself from the French, tried to convince many fugitives to return by saying that the battle was almost won.[16][17]

    After more than an hour of fighting, the French sought refuge on a hill. The Venetians willing to pursue them were too few, and both contenders set up camp. The French lost more than a thousand men, while the Venetians more than two thousand, but the nobles on both sides were either isolated or dead.[18]

    Charles lost all his booty, valued at more than 300,000 ducats. A one-day truce was declared to bury the dead. The dead and also the wounded were stripped by the Italian infantry and local inhabitants. Rodolfo Gonzaga, son of the Marquis of Mantua Ludovico III Gonzaga, was among the casualties. After the battle, Charles marched on into Lombardy and returned to France.[3][19]

    Both parties strove to present themselves as the victors in the battle.[2] Due to the recapture of all the booty looted by Charles' troops and of his baggage train (among the trophies captured were Charles' personal helmet, two royal flags and the French king's personal collection of erotic images), the battle was reported in Venice as a victory, and was recorded and celebrated as such. But the French had won their battle, fighting off superior numbers and proceeding on their march.[a][20][21][2] The League took much higher casualties and could not prevent the French army from crossing Italian lands on its way back to France.[21]

    Consequences

    Ironically, on the same day as the battle was fought, Ferdinand II appeared before Naples with a Spanish fleet; he re-entered and occupied Naples the following day. He was welcomed with rejoicing by the citizens, as the French had made themselves hated through their behaviour. Pope Alexander VI denounced the French as having committed worse crimes in Italy than had the Goths. Already under threat of excommunication, Charles VIII was ordered to lay down his arms and promote the peace of Christendom by the pope. Alexander also wrote to the Venetians to congratulate them on winning "immortal fame" by their liberation of Italy.[22]

    Charles left Italy abandoning all his conquests. He attempted in the next few years to rebuild his army, but was hampered by the serious debts incurred by the previous one, and he never succeeded in recouping anything substantive. He died two-and-a-half years after his retreat, of an accident, striking his head while passing through a doorway, he succumbed to a sudden coma several hours later.

    Charles bequeathed a meagre legacy: he left France in debt and in disarray as a result of an ambition most charitably characterized as unrealistic, and having lost several important provinces that it would take centuries to recover. On a more positive side, his expedition did broaden contacts between French and Italian humanists, energizing French art and letters in the latter Renaissance.

    Charles proved to be the last of the elder branch of the House of Valois, and upon his death at Amboise the throne passed to a cousin, the Duc d'Orléans, who reigned as King Louis XII of France, who would try to make good his clearer claim to the Duchy of Milan.

    However, for Italy the consequences were catastrophic. Europe knew now, from Charles' expedition, of an enormously rich land, divided into easily conquerable principalities, and defended only by mercenary armies that refused to fight with the slightest disadvantage. Italy was to be the scene of a dispute between the main continental powers, with the result that the Italians were left with only a secondary role in their own destiny. Only Venice, Genoa, the Papal States, Savoy, and Tuscany would survive as independent nations after the end of the Italian Wars, losing however their original power and stability.

    See also

    Notes

    1. ^ The battle of Fornovo, by which Charles forced his way past the enemy who stood in his path, was not an indecisive action but a definite victory for France.[20]

    References

    1. ^ Mallett & Hale 1984, p. 56.
    2. ^ a b c d e Mallett & Shaw 2012, p. 31.
    3. ^ a b c d e Tucker 2010, p. 361.
    4. ^ a b Nolan 2006, p. 303.
    5. ^ Bernardo Corio, Storia di Milano, p. 585
    6. ^ Bernardo Corio, Storia di Milano, p. 588
    7. ^ Dupuy 1993, p. 438.
    8. ^ Trevor Dupuy, Harper Encyclopedia of Military History, p. 462
    9. ^ David Nicolle, Fornovo 1495 - France's bloody fighting retreat, p. 43
    10. ^ a b c Nolan 2006, p. 304.
    11. ^ Trevor Dupuy, Harper Encyclopedia of Military History, p. 462
    12. ^ David Nicolle, Fornovo 1495 - France's bloody fighting retreat, p. 43
    13. ^ Palmer 1994, p. 19.
    14. ^ Birtachas 2018, p. 327-328.
    15. ^ Nolan 2006, p. 303-304.
    16. ^ Francesco Guicciardini, Storia d'Italia, p. 9
    17. ^ David Nicolle, Fornovo 1495 - France's bloody fighting retreat, p. 43
    18. ^ David Nicolle, Fornovo 1495 - France's bloody fighting retreat, p. 43
    19. ^ David Nicolle, Fornovo 1495 - France's bloody fighting retreat, p. 43
    20. ^ a b Taylor 1921, p. 14.
    21. ^ a b Setton 1978, p. 493–494.
    22. ^ Setton 1978, p. 495–496.

    Sources

    • Birtachas, Stathis (2018). "Stradioti, Cappelletti, Compagnie or Milizie Greche: 'Greek' Mounted and Foot Troops in the Venetian State (Fifteenth to Eighteenth Centuries". In Theotokis, Georgios; Yıldız, Aysel (eds.). A Military History of the Mediterranean Sea: Aspects of War, Diplomacy, and Military Elites. Brill.
    • Dupuy, Trevor N. (1993). Harper Encyclopedia of Military History. HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-06-270056-8.
    • Mallett, M. E.; Hale, J. R. (1984). The Military Organisation of a Renaissance State: Venice C. 1400 to 1617. Cambridge University Press.
    • Mallett, Michael; Shaw, Christine (2012). The Italian Wars 1494–1559. Pearson.
    • Nolan, Cathal (2006). The Age Of Wars Of Religion, 1000 1650. Vol. 1:A-K. Greenwood Press.
    • Palmer, William (1994). The Problem of Ireland in Tudor Foreign Policy, 1485–1603. The Boydell Press.
    • Ritchie, Robert (2004). Historical Atlas of The Renaissance. Thalamus Publishing. ISBN 978-0-8160-5731-3.
    • Setton, Kenneth M. (1978). The Papacy and the Levant (1204–1571), Volume II: The Fifteenth Century. Philadelphia: The American Philosophical Society. ISBN 0-87169-127-2.
    • Taylor, Frederick Lewis (1921). The Art of War in Italy 1494-1529. Cambridge University Press.
    • Tucker, Spencer C. (2010). A Global Chronology of Conflict: From the Ancient World to the Modern Middle East: From the Ancient World to the Modern Middle East. Vol. I. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-85109-672-5.