Menippean satire

Not to be confused with Menippeah

The genre of Menippean satire is a form of satire, usually in prose, which has a length and structure similar to a novel and is characterized by attacking mental attitudes instead of specific individuals.^[1] Other features found in Menippean satire are a rhapsodic nature,^{[citation needed]} a fragmented narrative,^{[citation needed]} the combination of many different targets,^{[citation needed]} and the rapid moving between styles and points of view.^{[citation needed]}

The term is used by classical grammarians and by philologists mostly to refer to satires in prose (cf. the verse Satires of Juvenal and his imitators). Typical mental attitudes attacked and ridiculed by Menippean satires are "pedants, bigots, cranks, parvenus, virtuosi, enthusiasts, rapacious and incompetent professional men of all kinds," which are treated as diseases of the intellect.^[1][2] The term Menippean satire distinguishes it from the earlier satire pioneered by Aristophanes, which was based on personal attacks.^[3]

Terminology

The form is named after the Greek cynic Menippus. His works, now lost, influenced the works of Lucian and Marcus Terentius Varro; such satires are sometimes also termed Varronian satire. M. H. Abrams classifies Menippean satire as one form of indirect satire, the category opposed to the formal satire of direct criticism in the first person.^[4]

Paul Salzman, taking Menippean satire as a genre as "rather ill-defined", describes it as a mixture of allegory, picaresque narrative and satirical commentary.^[5] Northrop Frye found the term "cumbersome and in modern terms rather misleading", and proposed as replacement the term 'anatomy' (taken from Burton's Anatomy of Melancholy). In his theory of prose fiction it occupies the fourth place with the novel, romance and confession.^[6]

Classical tradition

Varro's own 150 books of Menippean satires survive only through quotations. The genre continued with Seneca the Younger, whose Apocolocyntosis, or "Pumpkinification", is the only near-complete classical Menippean satire to survive. The Menippean tradition is later evident in Petronius' Satyricon, especially in the banquet scene "Cena Trimalchionis", which combines epic form, tragedy, and philosophy with verse and prose.^{[citation needed]} In Apuleius' Golden Ass, the form is combined with the comic novel.^{[citation needed]}

Later examples

Contemporary scholars including Frye classify the following works as Menippean satires:^{[citation needed]}

• François Rabelais, Gargantua and Pantagruel (1564)^[4]
• John Barclay, Euphormionis Satyricon (1605)^[5]
• Joseph Hall, Mundus Alter et Idem (1605)^[5]
• Robert Burton, The Anatomy of Melancholy (1621)^[6][4]
• Jonathan Swift, A Tale of a Tub and Gulliver's Travels^{[citation needed]}
• Voltaire, Candide (1759)^[4]
• Thomas Love Peacock, Nightmare Abbey (1818)^[4]
• Thomas Carlyle, Sartor Resartus^{[citation needed]}
• Charles Kingsley, The Water-Babies^[6]
• Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland^[6]
• Aldous Huxley, Point Counter Point (1928)^[4]
• James Joyce, Finnegans Wake (1939)
• Flann O'Brien, At Swim-Two-Birds (1939)^{[citation needed]}
• Thomas Pynchon, Gravity's Rainbow (1973)^{[citation needed]}

Bakhtin's theory

Menippean satire plays a special role in Mikhail Bakhtin's theory of the novel. In Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics, Bakhtin treats Menippean satire as one of the classical "serio-comic" genres, alongside Socratic dialogue and other forms that Bakhtin claims are united by a "carnival sense of the world", wherein "carnival is the past millennia's way of sensing the world as one great communal performance" and is "opposed to that one-sided and gloomy official seriousness which is dogmatic and hostile to evolution and change".^{[citation needed]} Authors of "Menippea" in Bakhtin's sense include Voltaire, Diderot, and E.T.A. Hoffmann.^[7]

In a series of articles, Edward Milowicki and Robert Rawdon Wilson, building upon Bakhtin’s theory, have argued that Menippean is not a period-specific term, as many Classicists have claimed, but a term for discursive analysis that instructively applies to many kinds of writing from many historical periods including the modern. As a type of discourse, “Menippean” signifies a mixed, often discontinuous way of writing that draws upon distinct, multiple traditions. It is normally highly intellectual and typically embodies an idea, an ideology or a mind-set in the figure of a grotesque, even disgusting, comic character.

"The power of very physical images to satirize, or otherwise comment upon, ideas lies at the heart of Menippean satire."^[8]

Frye's definition

Critic Northrop Frye said that Menippean satire moves rapidly between styles and points of view.^{[citation needed]} Such satires deal less with human characters than with the single-minded mental attitudes, or "humours", that they represent: the pedant, the braggart, the bigot, the miser, the quack, the seducer, etc. Critic Frye observed,

He illustrated this distinction by positing Squire Western (from Tom Jones) as a character rooted in novelistic realism, but the tutors Thwackum and Square as figures of Menippean satire.

See also

Literature portal

• Satire Ménippée (1594) - a satirical work in France during the Wars of Religion

Notes

Bibliography

• Relihan, Joel. 1993. Ancient Menippean Satire. Baltimore.
• Kirk, Eugene P. Menippean Satire: An Annotated Catalogue of Texts and Criticism. New York: Garland, 1980.
• Martin, Martial, "Préface" in Satyre Menippee de la Vertu du Catholicon d'Espagne et de la tenue des Estats de Paris, MARTIN Martial (édition critique de), Paris, H. Champion, 2007, "Textes de la Renaissance", n° 117, 944 p. ISBN : 9782745314840
• Boudou, B., M. Driol, and P. Lambercy. "Carnaval et monde renverse." Etudes sur la Satyre Menippee. Ed. Frank Lestringant and Daniel Menager. Geneva: Droz, 1986. 105-118.
• Vignes, Jean. "Culture et histoire dans la Satyre Menippee." Etudes sur la Satyre Mennippee. Ed. Frank Lestringant and Daniel Menager. Geneva: Droz, 1985. 151-99.
• Kharpertian, Theodore D. A Hand to Turn the Time: The Menippean Satires of Thomas Pynchon. Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson U P, 1990.
• Kharpertian, Theodore D. "Of Models, Muddles, and Middles: Menippean Satire and Pynchon's V." Pynchon Notes 17.Fall (1985): 3-14.
• Courtney, E. "Parody and Literary Allusion in Menippean Satire." Philologus 106 (1962): 86-100.
• "Tristram Shandy, Digressions, and the Menippean Tradition." Scholia Satyrica 1.4 (1975): 3-16.
• Wilson, Robert Rawdon and Edward Milowicki. "Troilus and Cressida: Voices in The Darkness of Troy." Jonathan Hart, ed. Reading The Renaissance: Culture, Poetics, and Drama. New York: Garland, 1996. 129-144, 234-240.
• Milowicki, Edward J. and Robert Rawdon Wilson. "A Measure for Menippean Discourse: The Example of Shakespeare." Poetics Today 23: 2 (Summer 2002). 291-326.
• Wilson, Robert. "On Disgust: A Menippean Interview". Canadian Review of Comparative Literature 34: 2 (June, 2007). pp. 203–213. On Disgust: A Menippean Interview
• Payne, F. Anne. Chaucer and the Menippean Satire. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1981.
• Bakhtin, Mikhail. Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics, translated by Caryl Emerson. Minnesota U P 1984
• Sherbert, Garry. Menippean Satire and The Poetics of Wit: Ideologies of Self-Consciousness in Dunton, D’Urfey, and Sterne. Peter Lang, 1996.
• Weinbrot, Howard D. Menippean Satire Reconsidered. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 2005.