The effects of biased technological changes on total factor productivity: a rejoinder and new empirical evidence

Cristiano Antonelli and Francesco Quatraro

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The paper by Ji and Wang (J Technol Transf, 2013) calls new attention on the analysis of the effects of the direction of technological change. The aim of this paper is to better articulate and test the theoretical arguments that the direction of technological changes has specific effects on the efficiency of the production process and to study the incentives and the processes that lead to its introduction. The decomposition of total factor productivity growth into the bias and the shift effects enables to articulate the hypothesis that the types of technological change whether more neutral or more biased reflect the variety of the innovation processes at work. The evidence of a large sample of European regions tests the hypothesis that regional innovations systems with a strong science base are better able to introduce neutral technological changes while regional innovation systems that rely more upon learning processes and tacit knowledge favor the introduction of directed technologies a form of meta-substitution that aims at exploiting the opportunities provided by the most intensive use of locally abundant factors.

Date: 2014-01-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cse, nep-eff, nep-geo and nep-ino
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01070563
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (20)

Published in Journal of Technology Transfer, 2014, 39 (2), pp.281-299

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-01070563/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: The effects of biased technological changes on total factor productivity: a rejoinder and new empirical evidence (2014)
Working Paper: The Effects of Biased Technological Changes on Total Factor Productivity: A Rejoinder and New Empirical Evidence (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01070563

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().