Ranking scientists and departments in a consistent manner

Abstract: The standard data that we use when computing bibliometric rankings of scientists are just their publication/citation records, i.e., so many papers with 0 citation, so many with 1 citation, so many with 2 citations, etc. The standard data for bibliometric rankings of departments have the same structure. It is therefore tempting (and many authors gave in to temptation) to use the same method for computing rankings of scientists and rankings of departments. Depending on the method, this can yield quite surprising and unpleasant results. Indeed, with some methods, it may happen that the "best" department contains the "worst" scientists, and only them. This problem will not occur if the rankings satisfy a property called consistency, recently introduced in the literature. In this paper, we explore the consequences of consistency and we characterize two families of consistent rankings.

Keywords: ranking scientists; ranking departments; consistence; Bibliometrics; ranking of scientists; ranking of departments (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ipr, nep-pr~ and nep-sog
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00606931v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (33)

Published in Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62 (9), pp.1761-1769. ⟨10.1002/asi.21544⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-00606931v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Ranking scientists and departments in a consistent manner (2011)
Journal Article: Ranking scientists and departments in a consistent manner (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00606931

DOI: 10.1002/asi.21544

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().