Commodity Tax Hamonisation with Public Goods - An Alternative Perspective
Ben Lockwood
Discussion Papers from University of Exeter, Department of Economics
Abstract:
This paper investigates whether it is possible to find Pareto- improving commodity tax reforms that harmonise taxes between two countries when governments supply public goods and thus have revenue requirements. It is shown that, with two goods, and starting from Nash equilibrium taxes, any harmonising reform will always make both countries worse off (better off) if the imported good is taxed less heavily (more heavily) than the exported good by both countries. An example suggests that harmonisation is unlikely to be Pareto-improving if the revenue requirement is high, and the demand for imports is relatively price elastic. An alternative definition of harmonisation, difference harmonisation, which may yield Pareto-improvements under more general conditions is proposed.
Keywords: TAX POLICY; ECONOMIC REFORM (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 22 pages
Date: 1995
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
Working Paper: Commodity Tax Harmonization with Public Goods - An Alternative Perspective (1995)
Working Paper: Commodity Tax Harmonisation with Public Goods - an Alternative Perspective
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:exe:wpaper:9503
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Discussion Papers from University of Exeter, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sebastian Kripfganz ().