Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Remote sensing of forested wetlands: application of multitemporal and multispectral satellite imagery to determine plant community composition and structure in southeastern USA

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A hierarchical classification of forested wetland communities was developed for the lower Roanoke River floodplain of northeastern North Carolina, USA, through the use of multitemporal and multispectral satellite digital data. Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) images from different seasons (March–April, May–June, July–August) throughout a single year were used to exploit the phenological variability of forest communities for generating a landcover classification of ecologically important vegetation types within the floodplain. A hierarchical classification scheme was developed that relied upon customized spectral `feature sets' of Landsat TM bands and their transformations to generate the classified images for each level of the forest community classification scheme. The objective was to enhance the discrimination of the community types at subsequent levels of the hierarchical classification scheme through different spectral inputs from the assembled satellite time series in conjunction with detailed floristic information collected though in-situ methods. As such, general landcover classes were iteratively reclassified into more detailed classes at correspondingly `deeper' levels or nodes in the hierarchy. Vegetation classes included 21 forest communities and several other ecologically important classes in the study area. The integration of detailed field data permitted spatially-explicit and highly descriptive definitions of the forest types occurring within the floodplain. Additional field data were used to validate the compositional and structural characteristics of the mapped plant communities described by the classification scheme.

Use of fuzzy set theory in the accuracy assessment provided details on the magnitude and direction of errors in the classification, and permitted ecological interpretation of those errors. The application of fuzzy set concepts to the mapping of bottomland forest communities is significant because these forests typically exhibit substantial variation in species composition and support diverse canopy dominants. Unlike the discrete classification assessments that are traditionally employed, fuzzy sets report accuracy according to the degree of correctness of a mapped class. By this method, the natural variability of the forest communities can be reported relative to a continuous scale ranging from full membership, to partial membership, to zero membership. Using the most stringent rules for class membership, the classification was 92.1% accurate, but was 96.6% accurate when fuzzy (transitional) relationships between forest types were considered. Diagnostic statistics indicated the magnitude of classification correctness and the degree of confusion and/or ambiguity for classes at various levels of the classification scheme. Assessing classification accuracy through a continuous scale of membership simulated the natural variability and transitional nature of the forested wetland communities within the study area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, T. R., Jr. 1995. Relationships between Spatial Pattern and Environment at the Alpine Treeline Ecotone, Glacier National Park, Montana. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Geography, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

  • Allen, T. R., Jr. & Walsh, S. J. 1996. Spatial and compositional pattern of alpine treeline, Glacier National Park, Montana. Photogr. Eng. and Remote Sensing 62 (11): 1261-1268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolstad, P. V. & Lillesand, T. M. 1992. Improved classification of forest vegetation in northern Wisconsin through a rule-based combination of soils, terrain, and Landsat ThematicMapper data. Forest Sci. 38 (1): 5-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, M., Miller, J., Berlanger, M. & Hare, E. 1988. Senescence and spectral reflectance in in leaves on rothern pin oak Quercus palustris Muench.). Remote Sensing Environ. 25: 71-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congalton, R. G. 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classification of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing Environ. 37: 35-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crist, E. P. & Kauth, R. J. 1986. The Tasseled Cap demystified. Photogr. Eng. Remote Sensing 52 (1): 81-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Geographic Data Committee, 1997. Vegetation Classification Standard. Vegetation Subcommittee FGDC-STD-005. http://biology.usgs.gov/fgdc.veg/

  • Gopal, S. & Woodcock, C. 1994. Theory and methods for accuracyassessment of thematic maps using fuzzy sets. Photogr. Eng. Remote Sensing 60 (2): 181-188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosenbaugh, L. R. 1952. Plotless timber estimates — new, fast, easy. J. Forestry 50: 32-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, M. E., Jensen, J. R., Mackey, H. E. Jr., & Coulter, M. C. 1987. Remote sensing of wetland habitat: a wood stork example. Photogr. Eng. Remote Sensing 53 (8): 1075-1080.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, M. E., Jensen, J. R., Mackey, H. E. Jr., & Coulter, M. C. 1988. Monitoring wood stork foraging habitat using remote sensing and geographic information systems. Photogr. Eng. Remote Sensing 54 (11): 1601-1607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. R. 1996. Introductory Digital Image Processing. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. R., Christensen, E. J., & Sharitz, R. 1984. Nontidal wetland mapping in South Carolina using airborne multispectral scanner data. Remote Sensing Environ. 16: 1-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. R., Hodgson, M. E., Christensen, E., Mackey, H. E. Jr., Tinney, L. R. & Sharitz, R. 1986. Remote sensing inland wetlands: a multispectral approach. Photogr. Eng. Remote Sensing 52 (1): 87-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. R., Cowen, D. J., Althausen, J. D., Narumalani, S. & Weatherbee, O. 1993. An evaluation of the CoastWatch change detection protocol in South Carolina. Photogr. Eng. Remote Sensing 59 (6): 1039-1046.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justice, C. O. & Townshend, J. R. G. 1981. Integrating ground data with remote sensing. Pp. 38-58. In: Townshend, J. R. G. (ed.), Terrain Analysis and Remote Sensing. Allen and Unwin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kartesz, J. T. 1994. A Synonymized Checklist of the Vascular Flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland, 2nd edition. Timber Press, Portland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauth, R. J. & Thomas, G. S. 1976. The Tasseled Cap — a graphicdescription of the spectral-temporal development of agricultural crops as seen by Landsat. Proceedings of the Symposium on Machine Processing of Remotely Sensed Data, Purdue University, West Lafayette, 4B41-4B51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, A. A., Barton, J. D. & Miles, S. R. 1958. Field efficiencies of forest sampling methods. Ecology 39: 428-444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, H. E., Jr. 1990. Monitoring seasonal and annual wetland changes in a freshwater marsh with SPOT HRV data. Technical Papers, 1990 ASPRS/ACSM Ann. Conv. Exp. 4: 283-292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, N. E. & Dyer, K. W. 1990. Floodplain vegetation phenology in the Southeast USA: optimizing the timing of aerial imagery acquisition. Wetlands Ecol. Manag. 1 (2): 65-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michener, W. K. & Houhoulis, P. F. 1997. Detection of vegetation changes associated with extensive flooding in a forested ecosystem. Photogr. Eng. Remote Sensing 63 (12): 1363-1374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. R., Wu, J., Boyer, M. G., Berlanger, M. & Hare, E. W. 1991. Seasonal patterns in leaf reflectance rededge characteristics. Int. J. Remote Sensing 12 (7): 1509-1523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, S. V., Walker, D. A., Nelson, F. E., Auerbach, N. A., Bockheim, J. G., Guyer, S. & Sherba, D. 1998. Accuracy assessment of a land-cover map of the Kuparuk River basin, Alaska: Considerations for remote regions. Photogr. Eng. Remote Sensing 64 (6): 619-628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet, R. K., Wentworth, T. R. & White, P. S. 1998. A flexible, multipurpose method for recording vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63 (3): 262-274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, S. K. & Peet, R. K. 1997. Vegetation of the Lower Roanoke River Floodplain. Report to The Nature Conservancy, Durham, NC.

  • Richards, J. A. 1993. Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfield, G. H. & Fitzpatrick-Lins, K. 1986. A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy. Photogr. Eng. Remote Sensing 52 (2): 223-227.

    Google Scholar 

  • San Miguel-Ayanz, J. & Biging, G. S. 1997. Comparison of singlestage and multi-stage classification approaches for cover tyrp mapping with TM and SPOT data. Remote Sensing Environ. 59: 92-104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafale, M. P. & Weakley, A. S. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharitz, R. R. & Mitsch, W. J. 1993. Southern hardwood forests. Pp. 311-372. In: Martin, W. H., Boyce, S. G. & Echternacht, A. C. (eds), Biodiversity of the Southeastern United States: Lowland Terrestrial Communities. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shriever, J. R. & Congalton, R. G. 1993. Mapping forest covertypes in New Hampshire using multi-temporal Landsat Thematic Mapper data. ASPRS/ACSM Ann. Conv. Exp., New Orleans 333-342.

  • Simmons, C. E. 1993. Sediment Characteristics of North Carolina Streams 1970–1979. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2364.

  • Stewart, W. R., Carter, V., and Brooks, P. D. 1980. Inland (nontidal) wetland mapping. Photogr. Eng. Remote Sensing 46: 1201-1206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tant, P. L. 1981. Soil Survey ofWashington County, North Carolina. USDA Soil Conservation Service.

  • Tant, P. L., Ranson, R. H., Gagnon, J. A. & Mellette, E. W. 1990. Soil Survey of Bertie County, North Carolina. USDA Soil Conservation Service.

  • Toll, D. L. 1985. Effect of Landsat Thematic Mapper sensor parameters on land cover classification. Remote Sensing Environ. 17: 129-140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tou, J. T. & Gonzalez, R. C. 1977. Pattern Recognition Principles. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, P. A. & Butler, D. R. 1996. Patterns of landscape use by beaver on the lower Roanoke River floodplain, North Carolina. Phys. Geography 17 (3): 253-269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, P. A. & Walsh, S. J. 1998. Modeling floodplain inundation using an integrated GIS with radar and optical remote sensing. Geomorphology 21 (3-4): 295-312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, P. A., Walsh, S. J. & Butler, D. R. 1995. Beaver pond identification through a satellite-based ecological habitat classification. Technical Papers, 1995 ASPRS-ACSM Annual Convention and Exposition, Charlotte, NC, 2: 102-111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, S. J. & Townsend, P. A. 1995. Comparison of change detection approaches for assessing a riverine flood hydroperiod. Technical Papers, 1995 ASPRS-ACSM Annual Convention and Exposition, Charlotte, NC, 2: 134-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wharton, C. H., Kitchens, W. M., Pendleton, E. C. & Sipe, T. W. 1982. The ecology of bottomland hardwood swamps of the Southeast: a community profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Services Program, FWS/OBS-81/37.

  • Wolter, P. T., Mladenoff, D. J., Host, G. E. & Crow, T. R. 1995. Improved forest classification in the northern Lake States using multitemporal Landsat imagery. Photogr. Eng. Remote Sensing 61 (9): 1129-1143.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Appalachian Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, 301 Braddock Road, Frostburg, MD, 21532-2307, USA

    Philip A. Townsend

  2. Department of Geography, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-3220, USA

    Stephen J. Walsh

Authors
  1. Philip A. Townsend
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephen J. Walsh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Townsend, P.A., Walsh, S.J. Remote sensing of forested wetlands: application of multitemporal and multispectral satellite imagery to determine plant community composition and structure in southeastern USA. Plant Ecology 157, 129–149 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013999513172

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013999513172

Search

Navigation