Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spatial patterns of primary productivity in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Landscapes are often heterogeneous in abiotic factors such as topography, climate, and soil, yet little is known about how these factors may influence the spatial distribution of primary productivity. We report estimates of aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) in 90 sample stands stratified by cover type and elevation class, and use the results to predict ANPP across a portion of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Tree ANPP was estimated by sampling tree density by species and diameter classes and estimating average annual diameter increment by tree coring. Biomass for current tree diameter and past tree diameter were calculated by species and diameter class for each stand using the dimension analysis software BIOPAK. Shrub ANPP was estimated by calculating current biomass from basal area using BIOPAK and dividing by the assumed average life span of the shrubs. Clipping at the end of the growing season was used to estimate herb ANPP. Differences in ANPP among cover types and elevation classes were examined with analysis of variance. Multiple regression was used to examine relationships between ANPP, and soil parent material, topography, and cover type. The best regression model was used to predict ANPP across the study area.

We found ANPP was highest in cottonwood, Douglas-fir, and aspen stands, intermediate in various seral stages of lodgepole pine, and lowest in grassland and sagebrush cover types. Parent material explained significant variation in ANPP in mature and old-growth lodgepole pine stands, with rhyolite ash/loess being the most productive parent material type. ANPP decreased with increasing elevation in most cover types, possibly because low temperatures limit plant growth at higher elevations in the study area. ANPP was not related to elevation in mature and old-growth lodgepole pine stands, due to relatively rapid growth of subalpine fir at higher elevations.

A regression model based on cover type and elevation explained 89% of the variation in ANPP among the sample stands. This model was used to generate a spatially continuous surface of predicted ANPP across the study area. The frequency distribution of predicted ANPP was skewed towards lower levels of ANPP, and only 6.3% of the study area had a predicted ANPP level exceeding 4500 kg/ha/yr. Patches high in predicted ANPP were primarily at lower elevations, outside of Yellowstone National Park, and near the national forest/private lands boundary. These patterns of ANPP may influence fire behavior, vertebrate population dynamics, and other ecological processes. The results reinforce the need for coordinated management across ownership boundaries in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike, H. 1973. Information theory an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In Int. Symp. Inf. Theory, second ed. pp. 267–281 Editetd by Petran B.N. and Csaki, F. Adakemial iadi, Budapest, Hungary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W. 1992. The landscape ecology of large disturbances in the design and management of nature reserves. Landscape Ecol. 7(3):181–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S.W. 1994. Fire regimes of andesitic mountain terrain in northeastern Yellowstone National Park, WY. Int. J. Wildland Fire 4(2): 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bormann, F.H., Siccama, T.G., Likens, G.E. and Whittaker, R.H. 1970. The Hubbard Brook ecosystem study: composition and dynamics of the tree stratum. Ecol. Monographs 40: 373–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowerman, T.S., Dorr, J., Leahy, S., Varga, K., Warrick, J. 1997. Targhee National Forest Ecological Unit Inventory. USDA Forest Service, Targhee National Forest, St. Anthony, ID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce, M.S. 1991. Natural Regulation or the Control of Nature? In The greater yellowstone ecosystem. pp. 183–208. Edited by Keiter, R.B., Boyce, M.S. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, A.F., Fischer, W.C. and Noste, N.V. 1992. Fire ecology of the forest habitat types of eastern Idaho and Western Wyoming. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, GTRINT-290, Ogden, UT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, I.C., Kittel, T.G.F., Lauenroth, W. K., Snook, P. and Yonker, C.M. 1991. Regional analysis of the central Great Plains: sensitivity to climate variability. Bioscience 41(10): 685–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, I.C., Lauenroth W.K. and Parton, W.J. 1997. Regional and temporal variation in net primary production and nitrogen mineralization in grasslands. Ecology 78(5): 1330–1340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K.P. and Anderson, D.R. 1992. Data-based selection of an appropriate biological model: the key to modern data analysis. In Wildlife 2001: Populations. pp. 16–30. Edited by McCullough, D.R. and Barrett, B.H. Elsevier Sci. Publ., New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, T.R. 1978. Biomass and production in three contiguous forests in northern Wisconsin. Ecology 59: 265–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daubenmire, R. 1952. Forest vegetation of northern Idaho and adjacent Washington, and its bearing on concepts of vegetation classification. Ecol. Monog. 22: 301–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, C.E., and Shovic, H.F. 1996. Soil Survey of the Gallatin National Forest, Montana. USDA Forest Service, Gallatin National Forest, Bozeman, MT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Despain, D. 1990. Yellowstone Vegetation. Roberts Rinehart Publishers, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESRI. 1982–1997. ARC/INFO on-line documentation. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. Redlands, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graumlich, L.J., Brubaker, L.B. and Grier, C.C. 1989. Long-term trends in forest net primary productivity: Cascade Mountains, Washington. Ecology 70: 405–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, A.J., Rotella, J.R. and Kraska, M.L. 1999. Dynamic habitat and population analysis: A filtering approach to resolve the biodiversity manager's dilemma. Ecol. Appl. 9(4): 1459–1476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, M.A. 1994. Biological Diversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, R.E. Ryan K.C. and Running, S.W. 1996. Simulating effects of fire on northern Rocky Mountain landscapes with the ecological process model FIRE-BGC. Tree Physiology 16: 319–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keiter, R.B. and Boyce, M.S. ed. 1991. The Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem: Redefining America's Wilderness Heritage. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, A.K., Fahnestock, J.T., Hamburg, S. P., Statland, L. B., Seastedt, T. R. and Schimel, D.S. 1993. Landscape patterns in soil-plant water relations and primary production in tallgrass prairie. Ecology 74: 549–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, B.E. and Waring, R.H. 1994. Combining remote sensing and climatic data to estimate net primary production across Oregon. Ecol. Appl. 4: 717–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Z. and Redmond, R.L. 1995. Tau Coefficients for Accuracy Assessment of Classification of Remote Sensing Data. Photog. Eng. Remote Sensing 61: 435–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal, K., and Marks, B.J. 1994. FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Forest Science Department, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Means, J.E., Hansen, H.A., Koerper, G.J., Alaback, P.B. and Klopsch, M.W. 1994. Software for Computing Plant Biomass–BIOPAK Users Guide. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-340, Portland, OR.

  • Pearson, J.A., Knight, D.H. and Fahey, T.J. 1987. Biomass and nutrient accumulation during stand development in Wyoming lodgepole pine forests. Ecology 68: 1966–1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, D.A. 1994. Forest Ecosystems. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam, H.R. 1988. Sources, sinks and population regulation. Am. Nat. 132: 652–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam, H.R., and Danielson, B.J. 1991. Sources, sinks, and habitat selection: a landscape perspective on population dynamics. Am. Nat. 137: S50–S66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raich, J.W., Russell, A. E. and Vitousek, P.M. 1997. Primary productivity and ecosystem development along an elevational gradient on Mauna Loa, Hawai'i. Ecology 78: 707–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, A., Shovic, H. and Thoma, D. Soils of Yellowstone National Park. 1996. Yellowstone Center for Resources, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, YCR-NRSR-96-2.

  • Romme, W. H. 1982. Fire and landscape diversity in subalpine forests of Yellowstone National Park. Ecol. Monog. 52(2): 199–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M.L. 1995. Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge Universtiy Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabin, T.E., and Stafford, S.G. 1990. Assessing the Need for transformation of response variables. Special Publication 20, Forest Research Lab, College of Forestry, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS. 1991. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Release 6.03, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S.P., Adhikari, B.S. and Zobel, D.B. 1994. Biomass, productivity, leaf longevity, and forest structure in the central Himalayan. Ecol. Monog. 64: 401–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, C.L., Blair, J.M., Schartz, R.J. and Neel, J.C. 1997. Soil N and plant responses to fire, topography, and supplemental N in tallgrass prairie. Ecology 78: 1832–1843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G. and Romme, W.H. 1993. Landscape dynamics in crown fire ecosystems. Landscape Ecol. 9: 59–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Geological Survey. 1993. Data Users Guide 5: Digital Elevation Models. Reston, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T.T. 1998. RockyMountains. In Terrestrial Vegetation of North America. Edited by Barbour, M.G., and Billings, D. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, S.J., Brown, D.G., Bian, L. and Allen, T.R. 1994. Effects of spatial scale on data certainty: An assessment through data dependency and sensitivity analyses. International symposium on the spatial accuracy of natural resource data bases. Am. Soc. Photog. Remote Sensing, 151–160.

  • Waring, R.H., and Schlesinger, W.H. 1985. Forest ecosystems: concepts and management. Academic Press, Orlando, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J.D. and Running, S.W. 1994. Testing scale dependent assumptions in regional ecosystem simulations. J. Veg. Sci. 5: 687–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R.H. 1975. Communities and ecosystems. MacMillan Publishing Co., Inc. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R.H. and Niering, W.A. 1975. Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona. V. biomass, production, and diversity along the elevation gradient. Ecology 56: 771–790.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hansen, A., Rotella, J., Kraska, M. et al. Spatial patterns of primary productivity in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Landscape Ecology 15, 505–522 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008127228878

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008127228878

Navigation