Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Maslow’s Hierarchy of Human Needs and the Adoption of Health-Related Technologies for Older Adults

  • Published:
Ageing International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Technologies are being developed and promoted with the aim of improving the health and quality of life of older adults, but often without analyzing or planning around the human needs of users. Abraham Maslow’s model of the hierarchy of needs proposes that people seek to satisfy progressively higher human needs, starting with physical needs like food and shelter, and advancing through safety and security, belonging and love, esteem, and self-actualization. Each of these levels of need has relevance for aging-related technologies. Lack of attention to user needs may be one factor that explains the limited adoption of many aging-related technologies. It is important to consider the users’ current levels of need, the different needs of patients and caregivers, the degrees of behavioral change expected at different levels of need, and the unintended consequences of technologies. Insights from Maslow’s model can help developers, researchers, providers, and consumers in the process of producing, evaluating, recommending, and purchasing technologies for older adults. One particular challenge is that assistive technologies may undermine esteem needs by limiting independence. Scales to measure levels of need can help characterize which needs are most relevant for different individuals, and can be used to ensure that technologies address users’ needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acton, G. J., & Malathum, P. (2000). Basic need status and health-promoting self-care behavior in adults. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 22(7), 796–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alwan, M. (2009). Passive in-home health and wellness monitoring: overview, value and examples. Conference Proceedings—IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2009, 4307–4310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnrich, B., Mayora, O., et al. (2009). Pervasive healthcare: paving the way for a pervasive, user-centered and preventive healthcare model. Methods of Information in Medicine, 49(1), 67–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaudin, J. S., Intille, S. S., & Morris, M. E. (2006). To track or not to track: user reactions to concepts in longitudinal health monitoring. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 8(4), e29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beddington, J., Cooper, C. L., et al. (2008). The mental wealth of nations. Nature, 455(7216), 1057–1060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, S. G., & Dundis, S. P. (2003). Understanding and motivating health care employees: integrating Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, training and technology. Journal of Nursing Management, 11, 315–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharucha, A. J., Anand, V., et al. (2009). Intelligent assistive technology applications to dementia care: current capabilities, limitations, and future challenges. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17(2), 88–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borg, C., Hallberg, I. R., et al. (2006). Life satisfaction among older people (65+) with reduced self-care capacity: the relationship to social, health and financial aspects. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 15(5), 607–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botsis, T., Demiris, G., et al. (2008). Home telecare technologies for the elderly. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 14(7), 333–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brittain, K., Corner, L., et al. (2010). Ageing in place and technologies of place: the lived experience of people with dementia in changing social, physical and technological environments. Sociology of Health & Illness, 32(2), 272–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cash, J. J. (2009). Alert fatigue. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 66(23), 2098–2101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copelton, D. A. (2010). Output that counts: pedometers, sociability and the contested terrain of older adult fitness walking. Sociology of Health & Illness, 32(2), 304–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coughlin, J., & Lau, J. (2006). Cathedral builders wanted: constructing a new vision of technology for old age. Public Policy and Aging Report, 16(1), 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlin, J., D’Ambrosio, L. A., et al. (2007). Older adult perceptions of smart home technologies: implications for research, policy and market innovations in healthcare. Conference Proceedings—IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2007, 1810–1815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtney, K. L. (2008). Privacy and senior willingness to adopt smart home information technology in residential care facilities. Methods of Information in Medicine, 47(1), 76–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtney, K. L., Demiris, G., et al. (2008). Needing smart home technologies: the perspectives of older adults in continuing care retirement communities. Informatics in Primary Care, 16(3), 195–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darby, M. L., & Walsh, M. M. (1993). A proposed human needs conceptual model for dental hygiene: part I. Journal of Dental Hygiene, 67(6), 326–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darkins, A., Ryan, P., et al. (2008). Care Coordination/Home Telehealth: the systematic implementation of health informatics, home telehealth, and disease management to support the care of veteran patients with chronic conditions. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, 14(10), 1118–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., et al. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Kort, Y. A. W., IJsselsteijn, W. A., et al. (2005). Persuasive gerontechnology. Gerontechnology, 4(3), 123–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demiris, G., Rantz, M., et al. (2004). Older adults’ attitudes towards and perceptions of “smart home” technologies: a pilot study. Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine, 29(2), 87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demiris, G., & Hensel, B. K. (2008). Technologies for an aging society: a systematic review of “smart home” applications. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 33–40.

  • Demiris, G., Hensel, B. K., et al. (2008a). Senior residents’ perceived need of and preferences for “smart home” sensor technologies. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 24(1), 120–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demiris, G., Oliver, D. P., et al. (2008b). Findings from a participatory evaluation of a smart home application for older adults. Technology and Health Care, 16(2), 111–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogg, B. (2002). Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. New York: Morgan Kaufman Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., et al. (2003). A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3–4), 143–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, V., Calkins, M., & van Haitsma, K. (2005). An exploratory study of barriers to implementing technology in U.S. residential long-term care settings. Gerontechnology, 4(2), 86–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisardi, V., & Imbimbo, B. P. (2011). Gerontechnology for demented patients: smart homes for smart aging. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 23(1), 143–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaugler, J. E., Anderson, K. A., et al. (2004). The emotional ramifications of unmet need in dementia caregiving. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias, 19(6), 369–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goransson, O., Pettersson, K., et al. (2008). Personals attitudes towards robot assisted health care—a pilot study in 111 respondents. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 137, 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouveia, W. A. (2010). Alert fatigue: a lesson relearned. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 67(8), 603–604. author reply 604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irvin, B. L., & Acton, G. J. (1996). Stress mediation in caregivers of cognitively impaired adults: theoretical model testing. Nursing Research, 45(3), 160–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, K., & Loe, M. (2010). A sociological approach to ageing, technology and health. Sociology of Health & Illness, 32(2), 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karunanithi, M. (2007). Monitoring technology for the elderly patient. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 4(2), 267–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, S., Marschollek, M., et al. (2009). On health-enabling and ambient-assistive technologies. What has been achieved and where do we have to go? Methods of Information in Medicine, 48(1), 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leidy, N. K. (1994). Operationalizing Maslow’s theory: development and testing of the basic need satisfaction inventory. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 15(3), 277–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luehning, E. (2001). Microsoft tool ‘Clippy’ gets a pink slip. CNET News.

  • Maciuszek, D. (2005). Towards dependable virtual companiens for later life. Linköping, Sweden: Linköping Studies in Science and Technology, Unpublished Thesis, Number 1994.

  • Maddux, J. (1997). Health, habit, and happiness. Journal of Sport and Exercise Physiology, 19, 331–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, W. C., Marchant, T., et al. (2001–2002). Elder acceptance of health monitoring devices in the home. Care Management Journal, 3(2), 91–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S., Kelly, G., et al. (2008). Smart home technologies for health and social care support. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (4), CD006412.

  • Maslow, A. (1970). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper and Rowe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattke, S., Seid, M., et al. (2007). Evidence for the effect of disease management: is $1 billion a year a good investment? The American Journal of Managed Care, 13(12), 670–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neven, L. (2010). ‘But obviously not for me’: robots, laboratories and the defiant identify of elder test users. Sociology of Health & Illness, 32(2), 335–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterberg, L., & Blaschke, T. (2005). Adherence to medication. The New England Journal of Medicine, 353(5), 487–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid-Cunningham, A. R. (2008). Maslow’s theory of motivation and hierarchy of human needs: A critical analysis. Unpublished thesis, School of Social Welfare, University of California Berkeley.

  • Scherer, M. J. (2004). Connecting to learn: Educational and assistive technology for people with disabilities. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, M. J. (2005). Assessing the benefits of using assistive technologies and other supports for thinking, remembering and learning. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27(13), 731–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholzel-Dorenbos, C. J., Meeuwsen, E. J., et al. (2010). Integrating unmet needs into dementia health-related quality of life research and care: Introduction of the hierarchy model of needs in dementia. Aging and Mental Health, 14(1), 113–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stip, E., & Rialle, V. (2005). Environmental cognitive remediation in schizophrenia: ethical implications of “smart home” technology. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 50(5), 281–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tak, S. H., Benefield, L. E., et al. (2009). Technology for long-term care. Research in Gerontological Nursing, 3(1), 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, H. J., & Thielke, S. M. (2009). How do health care providers perceive technologies for monitoring older adults? Conference Proceedings—IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1, 4315–4318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahba, M. A., & Bridwell, L. G. (1976). Maslow reconsidered: a review of research on the need hierarchy theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 15(2), 212–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. J., Mitchell, J. M., et al. (2009). Effects of assistive technology on functional decline in people aging with a disability. Assistive Technology, 21(4), 208–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by an American Geriatrics Society / Hartford Foundation Geriatric Health Outcomes Research Award, and by Career Development Award K23 MH093591-01 (NIMH and American Federation for Aging Research).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Thielke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thielke, S., Harniss, M., Thompson, H. et al. Maslow’s Hierarchy of Human Needs and the Adoption of Health-Related Technologies for Older Adults. Ageing Int 37, 470–488 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-011-9121-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-011-9121-4

Keywords

Navigation