Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

An optimization model of UAV route planning for road segment surveillance

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) was introduced to take road segment traffic surveillance. Considering the limited UAV maximum flight distance, UAV route planning problem was studied. First, a multi-objective optimization model of planning UAV route for road segment surveillance was proposed, which aimed to minimize UAV cruise distance and minimize the number of UAVs used. Then, an evolutionary algorithm based on Pareto optimality technique was proposed to solve multi-objective UAV route planning problem. At last, a UAV flight experiment was conducted to test UAV route planning effect, and a case with three scenarios was studied to analyze the impact of different road segment lengths on UAV route planning. The case results show that the optimized cruise distance and the number of UAVs used decrease by an average of 38.43% and 33.33%, respectively. Additionally, shortening or extending the length of road segments has different impacts on UAV route planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. COIFMAN B, MCCORD M, MISHALANI R. Surface transportation surveillance from unmanned aerial vehicles [C]// Transportation Research Board of the National Academies. Washington D C: National Research Council, 2004: 321–335.

    Google Scholar 

  2. KENZO N. Prospect and recent research and development for civil use autonomous unmanned aircraft as UAV and MAV [J]. Journal of System Design and Dynamics, 2007, 1(2): 120–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. PENG Zhong-ren, LIU Xiao-feng, ZHANG Li-ye, SUN Jian. Research progress and prospect of UAV applications in transportation information collection [J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2012, 12(6): 119–126. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  4. HUTCHISON M G. A method for estimating range requirements of tactical reconnaissance UAVs [C]// Proceedings of AIAA’s 1st Technical Conference and Workshop on Unmanned Aerospace Vehicles. Virginia: AIAA, 2002: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  5. TIAN Jing, SHEN Lin-cheng, ZHENG Yan-xing. Genetic algorithm based approach for multi-UAV cooperative reconnaissance mission planning problem [C]// International Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems. Berlin: Springer, 2006: 101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  6. YAN Qin-yu, PENG Zhong-ren, CHANG Yun-tao. Unmanned aerial vehicle cruise route optimization model for sparse road network [C]// Transportation Research Board of the National Academies. Washington D C: National Research Council, 2011: 432–445.

    Google Scholar 

  7. LIU Xiao-feng, CHANG Yun-tao, WANG Xun. A UAV allocation method for traffic surveillance in sparse road network [J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2012, 29(3): 124–130. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. LIU Xiao-feng, PENG Zhong-ren, ZHANG Li-ye, LI Li. Unmanned aerial vehicle route planning for traffic information collection [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2012, 12(1): 91–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. LIU Xiao-feng, PENG Zhong-ren, CHANG Yun-tao, ZHANG Li-ye. Multi-objective evolutionary approach for UAV cruise route planning to collect traffic information [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19(12): 3614–3621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. FONSECA C M, FLEMING P J. Genetic algorithms for multiobjective optimization: formulation, discussion and generalization [C]// Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms. San Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1993: 416–423.

    Google Scholar 

  11. ZITZLER E, THIELE L. Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms: A comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach [J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 1999, 3(4): 257–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. HORN J, NAFPLIOTIS N, GOLDBERG D E. A niched Pareto genetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization [C]// Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation. Piscataway: IEEE, 1994: 82–87.

    Google Scholar 

  13. KNOWLES J, CORNE D. The Pareto archived evolution strategy: A new baseline algorithm for Pareto multiobjective optimization [C]// Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. Washington D C: IEEE, 1999: 98–105.

    Google Scholar 

  14. SRINIVAS N, DEB K. Multi-objective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms [J]. Evolutionary Computation, 1994, 2(3): 221–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. DEB K, PRATAP A, AGARWAL S, DEB K, PRATAP A, AGARWAL S, MEYARIVAN T. A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II [J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(2): 182–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiao-feng Liu  (刘晓锋).

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(2009AA11Z220) supported by National High Technology Research and Development Program of China; Projects(61070112, 61070116) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China; Project(2012LLYJTJSJ077) supported by the Ministry of Public Security of China; Project(KYQD14003) supported by Tianjin University of Technology and Education, China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Xf., Guan, Zw., Song, Yq. et al. An optimization model of UAV route planning for road segment surveillance. J. Cent. South Univ. 21, 2501–2510 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-014-2205-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-014-2205-z

Key words

Navigation