Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Mobile Tablet Use among Academic Physicians and Trainees

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rapid adoption rate and integration of mobile technology (tablet computing devices and smartphones) by physicians is reshaping the current clinical landscape. These devices have sparked an evolution in a variety of arenas, including educational media dissemination, remote patient data access and point of care applications. Quantifying usage patterns of clinical applications of mobile technology is of interest to understand how these technologies are shaping current clinical care. A digital survey examining mobile tablet and associated application usage was administered via email to all ACGME training programs. Data regarding respondent specialty, level of training, and habits of tablet usage were collected and analyzed. 40 % of respondents used a tablet, of which the iPad was the most popular. Nearly half of the tablet owners reported using the tablet in clinical settings; the most commonly used application types were point of care and electronic medical record access. Increased level of training was associated with decreased support for mobile computing improving physician capabilities and patient interactions. There was strong and consistent desire for institutional support of mobile computing and integration of mobile computing technology into medical education. While many physicians are currently purchasing mobile devices, often without institutional support, successful integration of these devices into the clinical setting is still developing. Potential reasons behind the low adoption rate may include interference of technology in doctor-patient interactions or the lack of appropriate applications available for download. However, the results convincingly demonstrate that physicians recognize a potential utility in mobile computing, indicated by their desire for institutional support and integration of mobile technology into medical education. It is likely that the use of tablet computers in clinical practice will expand in the future. Thus, we believe medical institutions, providers, educators, and developers should collaborate in ways that enhance the efficacy, reliability, and safety of integrating these devices into daily medical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peck, A. D., App-solutely fabulous. Hundreds of new apps for iPAD and tablets make mHealth a reality and a lifestyle choice. Med. Econ. 88(22):S11–S14, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Collins, F., How to fulfill the true promise of “mHealth”: Mobile devices have the potential to become powerful medical tools. Sci. Am. 307(1):16, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Martin, S., MD’s computer, PDA use on the upswing. CMAJ 167(7):794, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carney, P. A., Poor, D. A., Schifferdecker, K. E., Gephart, D. S., Brooks, W. B., and Nierenberg, D. W., Computer use among community-based primary care physician preceptors. Acad. Med. 79(6):580–590, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Garritty, C., and El, E. K., Who’s using PDAs? Estimates of PDA use by health care providers: A systematic review of surveys. J. Med. Internet Res. 8(2):e7, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Burt, C. W., and Sisk, J. E., Which physicians and practices are using electronic medical records? Health Aff. (Millwood) 24(5):1334–1343, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. DesRoches, C. M., Campbell, E. G., Rao, S. R., et al., Electronic health records in ambulatory care–a national survey of physicians. N. Engl. J. Med. 359(1):50–60, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kho, A., Henderson, L. E., Dressler, D. D., and Kripalani, S., Use of handheld computers in medical education. A systematic review. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 21(5):531–537, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Franko, O. I., and Tirrell, T. F.. Smartphone App use among medical providers in ACGME training programs. J. Med. Syst. 2011.

  10. Hormby, T., The story behind Apple’s Newton. 2006; http://lowendmac.com/orchard/06/john-sculley-newton-origin.html. Accessed May 7, 2012.

  11. Apple. Apple Launches iPad. 2010; http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/01/27Apple-Launches-iPad.html. Accessed July 9, 2012.

  12. Bright P. Ballmer (and Microsoft) still doesn’t get the iPad. 2010; http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2010/07/ballmer-and-microsoft-still-doesnt-get-the-ipad/. Accessed May 7, 2012.

  13. IDC. Media tablet and ereader markets beat second quarter targets, forecast increased for 2011, according to IDC [Press Release]. 2011; http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS23034011. Accessed July 9, 2012.

  14. Research G. Gartner says worldwide media tablets sales to reach 119 million units in 2012. 2012; http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1980115. Accessed July 9, 2012.

  15. Katz, M. H., Mobile tablets: Benefits to residents and patients. Arch. Intern. Med. 172(5):438, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Technology, B. L., Will iPads lead to a technology arms race? Hosp. Health Netw. 84(3):20, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cooper, L., Tablets in clinical settings: are they up to the job? Compliance and durability concerns may be holding consumer-grade tablet computers back. Interview by Gabriel Perna. Healthc. Inform. 29(4):39–40, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Patel, B. K., Chapman, C. G., Luo, N., Woodruff, J. N., and Arora, V. M., Impact of mobile tablet computers on internal medicine resident efficiency. Arch. Intern. Med. 172(5):436–438, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hegarty, C., Barringer, K., Nelson, J., Binstadt, E., and Raghunandan, S., 2012 Innovations in Emergency Medicine Education (IEMEs). Acad. Emerg. Med. 19:S394–S411, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vawdrey, D. K., Wilcox, L. G., Collins, S. A., et al., A tablet computer application for patients to participate in their hospital care. AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc. 2011:1428–1435, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Escobar, S. K., Escobar, E. D., Whitten, C., and Griffen, J. D., Texas iPad anesthesia education domain. American Society of Anesthesiologists Annual Meeting, Chicago, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Strayer, S. M., Semler, M. W., Kington, M. L., and Tanabe, K. O., Patient attitudes toward physician use of tablet computers in the exam room. Fam. Med. 42(9):643–647, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mc Laughlin, P., Neill, S. O., Fanning, N., et al., Emergency CT brain: Preliminary interpretation with a tablet device: Image quality and diagnostic performance of the Apple iPad. Emerg. Radiol. 19(2):127–133, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Soehngen, E., Rahmah, N. N., Kakizawa, Y., et al., Operation-microscope-mounted touch display tablet computer for intraoperative imaging visualization. World Neurosurg. 77(2):381–383, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Agresti, A., and Coull, B. A., Approximate is better than “exact” for interval estimation of binomial proportions. Am. Stat. 52(2):119–126, 1998.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Morris, M. G., and Venkatesh, V., Age differences in technology adoption decisions: Implications for a changing work force. Pers. Psychol. 53(2):375–403, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 200 West Arbor Drive—MC #8894, San Diego, CA, 92103, USA

    Joseph Sclafani, Timothy F. Tirrell & Orrin I. Franko

  2. Biomedical Science Graduate Program, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA

    Timothy F. Tirrell

Authors
  1. Joseph Sclafani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Timothy F. Tirrell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Orrin I. Franko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Orrin I. Franko.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 4478 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sclafani, J., Tirrell, T.F. & Franko, O.I. Mobile Tablet Use among Academic Physicians and Trainees. J Med Syst 37, 9903 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-012-9903-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-012-9903-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation