Spatial statistics for urban analysis: A review of techniques with examples

• Abed J. and Kaysi I., 2003: Identifying urban boundaries: application of remote sensing and geographic information system technologies. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 30: 992–999.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Alonso W., 1964: Location and Land Use. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Alperovich G. and Deutsch J., 1992: Population-density gradients and urbanization measurement. Urban Studies 29: 1323–1328.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Alperovich G. and Deutsch J., 2002: An application of a switching regimes regression to the study of urban structure. Papers in Regional Science 81: 83–98.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Amrhein C.G., 1995: Searching for the elusive aggregation effect: Evidence from statistical simulations. Environment and Planning A 27: 105–119.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Amrhein C.G. and Flowerdew R., 1992: The effect of data aggregation on a Poisson regression-model of Canadian migration. Environment and Planning A 24: 1381–1391.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Anselin L. and Griffith D.A., 1988: Do spatial effects really matter in regression-analysis. Papers of the Regional Science Association 65: 11–34.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Anselin L., 1988: Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Anselin L., 1995: Local Indicators of Spatial Association — LISA. Geographical Analysis 27: 93–115.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bailey T.C. and Gatrell A.C., 1995: Interactive Spatial Data Analysis. Addison Wesley Longman, Essex.

  Google Scholar 

• Barredo J.I., Demicheli L., Lavalle C., Kasanko M. and McCormick N., 2004: Modelling future urban scenarios in developing countries: an application case study in Lagos, Nigeria. Environment and Planning B 31: 65–84.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Batty M. and Sikdar P.K., 1982a: Spatial aggregation in gravity models. 1. an information-theoretic framework. Environment and Planning A 14: 377–405.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Batty M. and Sikdar P.K., 1982b: Spatial aggregation in gravity models. 2. one-dimensional population-density models. Environment and Planning A 14: 525–553.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Batty M. and Sikdar P.K., 1982c: Spatial aggregation in gravity models. 3. two-dimensional trip distribution and location models. Environment and Planning A 14: 629–658.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Batty M. and Sikdar P.K., 1982d: Spatial aggregation in gravity models. 4. generalizations and large-scale applications. Environment and Planning A 14: 795–822.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Baumont C., Ertur C. and Le Gallo J., 2004: Spatial analysis of employment and population density: The case of the aglomeration of Dijon 1999. Geographical Analysis 36: 146–176.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bender B. and Hwang H., 1985: Hedonic housing price indices and secondary employment centers. Journal of Urban Economics 17: 90–107.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bennion M.W. and O’Neill W.A., 1994: Building transportation analysis zones using geographic information systems. Transportation Research Record 1429: 49–56.

  Google Scholar 

• Bhat C. and Zhao H.M., 2002: The spatial analysis of activity stop generation. Transportation Research B 36: 557–575.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bhat C.R. and Guo J., 2004: A mixed spatially correlated logit model: formulation and application to residential choice modeling. Transportation Research B 38: 147–168.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Black J.A., 1981: Urban Transport Planning. Croom Helm, London.

  Google Scholar 

• Blalock H., 1964: Causal Inferences on Nonexperimental Research. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.

  Google Scholar 

• Bolduc D., Dagenais M.G. and Gaudry M.J.I., 1989: Spatially autocorrelated errors in origin-destination models: A new specification applied to aggregate mode choice. Transportation Research B 23: 361–372.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bolduc D., Laferriere R. and Santarossa G., 1992: Spatial autoregressive error-components in travel flow models. Regional Science and Urban Economics 22: 371–385.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bolduc D., Laferriere R. and Santarossa G., 1995: Spatial autoregressive error components in travel flow models: an application to aggregate mode choice. In Anselin, L. and Florax, R. J.G.M. (eds), New Directions in Spatial Econometrics, pp. 96–108. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Briggs D.J., Collins S., Elliott P., Fischer P., Kingham S., Lebret E., Pryl K., VanReeuwijk H., Smallbone K. and VanderVeen A., 1997: Mapping urban air pollution using GIS: a regression-based approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 11: 699–718.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Brunsdon C., Fotheringham A.S. and Charlton M., 1999: Some notes on parametric significance tests for geographically weighted regression. Journal of Regional Science 39: 497–524.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Brunsdon C., Fotheringham A.S. and Charlton M.E., 1996: Geographically weighted regression: a method for exploring spatial nonstationarity. Geographical Analysis 28: 281–298.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ceccato V., Haining R. and Signoretta P., 2002: Exploring offence statistics in Stockholm City using spatial analysis tools. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92: 29–51.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cleveland W.S., 1979: Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing of scatterplots. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74: 823–836.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cliff A.D. and Ord J.K., 1981: Spatial Processes: Models and Applications. Pion, London.

  Google Scholar 

• Cornes R. and Sandler T., 1996: The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods. 2^nd Edition: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Craglia M., Haining R. and Signoretta P., 2001: Modelling high-intensity crime areas in English cities. Urban Studies 38: 1921–1941.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Craglia M., Haining R. and Wiles P., 2000: A comparative evaluation of approaches to urban crime pattern analysis. Urban Studies 37: 711–729.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Crampton G.R., 1991: Residential density patterns in London: any role left for the exponential density gradient. Environment and Planning A 23: 1007–1024.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cressie N.A.C., 1993: Statistics for Spatial Data. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Cuthbert A.L. and Anderson W.P., 2002a: An examination of urban form in Halifax-Dartmouth: alternative approaches in data. Canadian Journal of Urban Research 11: 213–237.

  Google Scholar 

• Cuthbert A.L. and Anderson W.P., 2002b: Using spatial statistics to examine the pattern of urban land development in Halifax-Dartmouth. Professional Geographer 54: 521–532.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• De la Barra T., 1989: Integrated Land Use and Transport Modelling. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Ding C., 1998: The GIS-based human-interactive TAZ design algorithm: examining the impacts of data aggregation on transportation-planning analysis. Environment and Planning B 25: 601–616.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Du G., 2001: Using GIS for analysis of urban systems. GeoJournal 52: 213–221.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Duncan C. and Jones K., 2000: Using multilevel models to model heterogeneity: potential and pitfalls. Geographical Analysis 32: 279–305.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fingleton B., 2000: Spatial econometrics, economic geography, dynamics and equilibrium: a ‘ third way’? Environment and Planning A 32: 1481–1498.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Flint C., 2002: The theoretical and methodological utility of space and spatial statistics for historical studies: the Nazi Party in geographic context. Historical Methods 35: 32–42.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fotheringham A.S., 1989: Scale-independent spatial analysis. In Goodchild, M. and Gopal, S. (eds), Accuracy of Spatial Databases, pp. 221–228. Taylor and Francis, London.

  Google Scholar 

• Fotheringham A.S., 2000: GIS-based spatial modelling: a step forwards or a step backwards. In Fotheringham, A.S. and Wegener, M. (eds), Spatial Models and GIS: New Potential and New Models, pp. 21–30. Taylor and Francis, London.

  Google Scholar 

• Fotheringham A.S. and Brunsdon C., 1999: Local forms of spatial analysis. Geographical Analysis 31: 340–358.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fotheringham A.S., Brunsdon C. and Charlton M., 2000: Quantitative Geography: Perspectives on Spatial Data Analysis. Sage, London.

  Google Scholar 

• Fotheringham A.S., Densham P.J. and Curtis A., 1995: The zone definition problem in location-allocation modeling. Geographical Analysis 27: 60–77.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fotheringham A.S. and Wong D.W.S., 1991: The modifiable areal unit problem in multivariate statistical analysis. Environment and Planning A 23: 1025–1044.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fujita M., Krugman P. and Venables A.J., 1999: The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions and International Trade. MIT Press, Cambridge.

  Google Scholar 

• Gehlke C.E. and Biehl K., 1934: Certain effects of grouping upon the size of the correlation coefficient in census tract material. Journal of the American Statistical Association 29: 169–170.

  Google Scholar 

• Getis A. and Ord J.K., 1993: The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis 25: 276–276.

  Google Scholar 

• Goodchild M.F., 1979: Aggregation problem in location-allocation. Geographical Analysis 11: 240–255.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Griffith D.A., 1988: Advanced Spatial Statistics: Special Topics in the Exploration of Quantitative Spatial Data Series. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Griffith D.A., 1999: Statistical and mathematical sources of regional science theory: map pattern analysis as an example. Papers in Regional Science 78: 21–45.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Griffith D.A. and Layne L.J., 1999: A Casebook for Spatial Statistical Data Analysis: A Compilation of Analyses of Different Thematic Data Sets. Oxford University Press, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Guo J.Y. and Bhat C.R., 2004: Modifiable areal units: a problem or a matter of perception in the context of residential location choice modeling? Transportation Research Record, forthcoming.

• Haider M. and Miller E.J., 2000: Effects of transportation infrastructure and location on residential real estate values: application of spatial autoregressive techniques. Transportation Research Record 1722: 1–8.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Haining R., 1990: Spatial Data Analysis in the Social and Environmental Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Hall P., 1986: The state of cities and the state of planning. In Hutchinson, B.G. and Batty, M. (eds), Advances in Urban Systems Modelling, pp. 3–13. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.

  Google Scholar 

• Harris B., 1985: Urban simulation-models in regional science. Journal of Regional Science 25: 545–567.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Harris B. and Batty M., 1993: Locational models, geographic information and planning support systems. Journal of Planning Education and Research 12: 184–198.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hodgson M.J., Shmulevitz F. and Körkel M., 1997: Aggregation error effects on the discrete-space p-median model: the case of Edmonton, Canada. Canadian Geographer 41: 415.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Holt D., Steel D.G., Tranmer M. and Wrigley N., 1996: Aggregation and ecological effects in geographically based data. Geographical Analysis 28: 244–261.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Horner M.W. and Murray A.T., 2002: Excess commuting and the modifiable areal unit problem. Urban Studies 39: 131–139.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Innes J.E. and Simpson D.M., 1993: Implementing GIS for planning: lessons from the history of technological innovation. Journal of the American Planning Association 59: 230–236.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jerrett M., Burnett R.T., Goldberg M.S., Sears M., Krewski D., Catalan R., Kanaroglou P., Giovis C. and Finkelstein N., 2003: Spatial analysis for environmental health research: concepts, methods, and examples. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health A 66: 1783–1810.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jones K., 1991: Specifying and estimating multilevel models for geographical research. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 16: 148–159.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jones K. and Bullen N., 1994: Contextual models of urban house prices: a comparison of fixed-coefficient and random-coefficient models developed by expansion. Economic Geography 70: 252–272.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kanaroglou P.S. and Scott D.M., 2002: Integrated urban transportation and land-use models. In Dijst, M., Schenkel, W. and Thomas, I. (eds), Governing Cities on the Move: Functional and Management Perspectives on Transformations of European Urban Infrastructures, pp. 42-72. Ashgate, Aldershot.

• Kanaroglou P.S., Soulakellis N.A. and Sifakis N.I., 2002: Improvement of satellite derived pollutions maps with the use of a geostatistical interpolation method. Journal of Geographical Systems 4: 193–208.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• King G., 1997: A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Reconstructing Individual Behavior from Aggregate Data. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

  Google Scholar 

• Krieger M.H., 1991: Segmentation and filtering into neighborhoods as processes of percolation and diffusion: stochastic-processes (randomness) as the null hypothesis. Environment and Planning A 23: 1609–1626.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kwan M.P., 2000: Interactive geovisualization of activity-travel patterns using three-dimensional geographical information systems: a methodological exploration with a large data set. Transportation Research C 8: 185–203.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Landis J. and Zhang M., 1998a: The second generation of the California urban futures model. part 1: model logic and theory. Environment and Planning B 25: 657–666.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Landis J. and Zhang M., 1998b: The second generation of the California urban futures model. part 2: specification and calibration results of the land-use change submodel. Environment and Planning B 25: 795–824.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Landis J. and Zhang M., 2000: Using GIS to improve urban activity and forecasting models: three examples. In Fotheringham, A.S. and Wegener, M. (eds), Spatial Models and GIS: New Potential and New Models, pp. 63–81. Taylor and Francis, London.

  Google Scholar 

• Levine J. and Landis J., 1989: Geographic information systems for local planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 55: 209–220.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Liu S.X. and Zhu X.A., 2004: Accessibility analyst: an integrated GIS tool for accessibility analysis in urban transportation planning. Environment and Planning B 31: 105–124.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• McMillen D.P., 1996: One hundred fifty years of land values in Chicago: a nonparametric approach. Journal of Urban Economics 40: 100–124.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• McMillen D.P., 2001: Nonparametric employment subcenter identification. Journal of Urban Economics 50: 448–473.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• McMillen D.P. and McDonald J.F., 1998: Population density in suburban Chicago: a bid-rent approach. Urban Studies 35: 1119–1130.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Meyer M.D. and Miller E.J., 2001: Urban Transportation Planning. 2^nd Edition: McGraw-Hill, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Miller H.J., 1999: Potential contributions of spatial analysis to geographic information systems for transportation (GIS-T). Geographical Analysis 31: 373–399.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Miller H.J. and Shaw S.L., 2001: Geographic Information Systems for Transportation: Principles and Applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  Google Scholar 

• Miyamoto K., Vichiensan V., Shimomura N. and Páez A., 2004: Discrete choice model with structuralized spatial effects for location analysis. Transportation Research Record, forthcoming.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Moeckel R., Spiekermann K., Schürmann C. and Wegener M., 2003: Microsimulation of urban land use. Paper presented at the 9th Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management, Sendai, Japan, 27–29 May.

• Mohammadian A. and Kanaroglou P.S., 2003: Applications of spatial multinomial logit model to transportation planning. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Lucerne, Switzerland, 10–14 August.

• Murdoch J.C., Sandler T. and Sargent K., 1997: A tale of two collectives: sulphur versus nitrogen oxides emission reduction in Europe. Economica 64: 281–301.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Murray A. and Gottsegen J., 1997: The influence of data aggregation on the stability of p-median location model solutions. Geographical Analysis 29: 200–213.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Odland J., 1987: Spatial Autocorrelation. Sage Publications, Newbury Park.

  Google Scholar 

• Okabe A. and Tagashira N., 1996: Spatial aggregation bias in a regression model containing a distance variable. Geographical Systems 3: 77–99.

  Google Scholar 

• Okunuki K., 2001: Urban analysis with GIS. GeoJournal 52: 181–188.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Openshaw S., 1977a: Geographical solution to scale and aggregation problems in region-building, partitioning and spatial modeling. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 2: 459–472.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Openshaw S., 1977b: Optimal zoning systems for spatial interaction models. Environment and Planning A 9: 169–184.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Openshaw S., 1978a: An optimal zoning approach to the study of spatially aggregated data. In Masser, I. and Brown, P.J.B. (eds), Spatial Representation and Spatial Interaction, pp. 93–113. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden.

  Google Scholar 

• Openshaw S., 1978b: Empirical-study of some zone-design criteria. Environment and Planning A 10: 781–794.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Openshaw S. and Baxter R.S., 1977: Algorithm 3 — procedure to generate pseudo-random aggregations of n-zones into m-zones, where m is less than n. Environment and Planning A 9: 1423–1428.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Openshaw S. and Rao L., 1995: Algorithms for reengineering 1991 census geography. Environment and Planning A 27: 425–446.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Openshaw S. and Taylor P.J., 1979: A million or so correlation coefficients: three experiments on the modifiable areal unit problem. In Wrigley, N. (ed), Statistical Applications in the Spatial Sciences, pp. 127–144. Pion, London.

  Google Scholar 

• Ord J.K. and Getis A., 1995: Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: distributional issues and an application. Geographical Analysis 27: 286–306.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ord J.K. and Getis A., 2001: Testing for local spatial autocorrelation in the presence of global autocorrelation. Journal of Regional Science 41: 411–432.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ortúzar J.D. and Willumsen L.G., 2001: Modelling Transport. 3^rd Edition: Wiley, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Pacheco A.I. and Tyrrell T.J., 2002: Testing spatial patterns and growth spillover effects in clusters of cities. Journal of Geographical Systems 4: 275–285.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pacione M., 1990: Urban Problems: An Applied Urban Analysis. Routledge, London.

  Google Scholar 

• Páez A., 2004: Network accessibility and the distribution of economic activity in Eastern Asia. Urban Studies (forthcoming).

• Páez A. and Suzuki J., 2001: Transportation impacts on land use change: an assessment considering neighborhood effects. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 4: 47–59.

  Google Scholar 

• Páez A., Uchida T. and Miyamoto K., 2001: Spatial association and heterogeneity issues in land price models. Urban Studies 38: 1493–1508.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Peeters D. and Ruhigira J.D., 2004: Using the transportation problem to measure the proximity between two sets of weighted points in geographical space. Papers in Regional Science 72: 337–347.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Putman S.H. and Chung S.H., 1989: Effects of spatial system-design on spatial interaction models.1. the spatial system definition problem. Environment and Planning A 21: 27–46.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Quandt R., 1958: The estimation of parameters of a linear regression system obeying two separate regimes. Journal of the American Statistical Association 53: 873–880.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ramos R.A.R. and Silva A.N.R., 2003: A data-driven approach for the definition of metropolitan regions. Paper presented at the 9th Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management, Sendai, Japan, 27–29 May.

• Raudenbush S.W., Bryk A.S., Cheong Y.F. and Congdon R., 2001: HLM 5: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling. 2^nd Edition: Scientific Software International, Illinois.

  Google Scholar 

• Rietveld P. and Wintershoven P., 1998: Border effects and spatial autocorrelation in the supply of network infrastructure. Papers in Regional Science 77: 265–276.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Robinson T.P., 2000: Spatial statistics and geographical information systems in epidemiology and public health. Advances in Parasitology 47: 81–128.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Scott D.M., Kanaroglou P.S. and Anderson W.P., 1997: Impacts of commuting efficiency on congestion and emissions: case of the Hamilton CMA, Canada. Transportation Research D 2: 245–257.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Spiekermann K. and Wegener M., 2000: Freedom from the tyranny of zones: towards new GIS-based spatial models. In Fotheringham, A.S. and Wegener, M. (eds), pp. 45-61. Taylor and Francis, London.

• Stanilov K., 2003: Accessibility and land use: the case of suburban Seattle, 1960-1990. Regional Studies 37: 783–794.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Steel D.G. and Holt D., 1996: Rules for random aggregation. Environment and Planning A 28: 957–978.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Steenberghen T., Dufays T., Thomas I. and Flahaut B., 2004: Intra-urban location and clustering of road accidents using GIS: a Belgian example. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 18: 169–181.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tagashira N. and Okabe A., 2002: The modifiable areal unit problem in a regression model whose independent variable is a distance from a predetermined point. Geographical Analysis 34: 1–20.

  Google Scholar 

• Thill J.C., 2000: Geographic information systems for transportation in perspective. Transportation Research C 8: 3–12.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tobler W.R., 1989: Frame independent spatial analysis. In Goodchild, M. and Gopal, S. (eds), Accuracy of Spatial Databases, pp. 115–122. Taylor and Francis, London.

  Google Scholar 

• Tranmer M. and Steel D.G., 1998: Using census data to investigate the causes of the ecological fallacy. Environment and Planning A 30: 817–831.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tse R.Y.C., 2002: Estimating neighbourhood effects in house prices: towards a new hedonic model approach. Urban Studies 39: 1165–1180.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Vichiensan V., Miyamoto K. and Shizukuishi K., 2001: GIS test bed building for land-use and transportation models. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management, Hawaii, 14–16 July.

• Wang D.G. and Cheng T., 2001: A spatio-temporal data model for activity-based transport demand modelling. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 15: 561–585.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wang F.H., 2001: Explaining intraurban variations of commuting by job proximity and workers’ characteristics. Environment and Planning B 28: 169–182.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wasserman S., Faust K. and Iacobucci D., 1994: Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Wegener M., Gnade F. and Vannahme M., 1986: The time scale of urban change. In Hutchinson, B.G. and Batty, M. (eds), Advances in Urban Systems Modelling, pp. 175–197. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.

  Google Scholar 

• Whittle P., 1954: On stationary processes in a plane. Biometrika 41: 434–439.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wise S., Haining R. and Ma J.S., 2001: Providing spatial statistical data analysis functionality for the GIS user: the SAGE project. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 15: 239–254.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wong D.W.S., 1996: Aggregation effects in geo-referenced data. In: Arlinghaus S.L., Griffith D.A., Drake W.D. and Nystuen J.D. (eds), Practical Handbook of Spatial Statistics, pp. 83–106. CRC Press, Boca Raton.

  Google Scholar 

• Wong D.W.S., Lasus H. and Falk R.F., 1999: Exploring the variability of segregation index D with scale and zonal systems: an analysis of thirty US cities. Environment and Planning A 31: 507–522.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• You J., Nedoviæ-Budiæ Z. and Kim T.J., 1997a: A GIS-based traffic analysis zone design: technique. Transportation Planning and Technology 21: 45–68.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• You J.S., Nedoviæ-Budiæ Z. and Kim T.J., 1997b: A GIS-based traffic analysis zone design: implementation and evaluation. Transportation Planning and Technology 21: 69–91.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references