Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of buffered 2.3%, buffered 0.9%, and non-buffered 0.9% irrigation solutions on nasal mucosa after septoplasty

  • Rhinology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A prospective randomized study was designed to compare the effect of different irrigation solutions on mucociliary clearance and nasal patency and to compare the limitations of the used solutions, such as nasal burning by a visual analog scale. Forty-five patients who underwent septoplasty were divided into three groups postoperatively. Each group was administered with 2.3% buffered hypertonic seawater, buffered isotonic saline solution and non-buffered isotonic saline, respectively, as irrigation fluid. Saccharine test and acoustic rhinometer were used to determine mucociliary activity and nasal patency. Patients were asked about the burning sensation using a 10-cm visual analog scale. There was no significant difference in saccharine clearance time (SCT) on the 5th postoperative day between the three groups (P = 0.07). On the 20th day, there was a significant difference in SCT between the hypertonic buffered seawater group and non-buffered isotonic saline (P = 0.003). Buffered hypertonic seawater improved nasal airway patency more than the buffered isotonic saline (P = 0.004). Buffered hypertonic solutions used after endonasal surgery have been advantageous for both mucociliary clearance and postoperative decongestion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Keojampa KB, Nguyen MH, Ryan MW (2004) Effects of buffered saline solution on nasal mucociliary clearance and nasal airway patency. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131:679–682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Proctor DF (1982) The mucociliary system. In: Proctor DF, Andersen I (eds) The nose: upper airway physiology and the atmospheric envoriment. Elseiver Biomedical Press, New York, pp 245–278

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shone GR, Yardley MP, Knight LC (1990) Mucociliary function in the early weeks after nasal surgery. Rhinology 28:265–268

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Talbot AR, Herr TM, Parsons D (1997) Mucociliary clearance and buffered hypertonic saline. Laryngoscope 107:500–503

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Robinson M, Regnis JA, Bailey DL et al (1996) Effect of hypertonic, amiloride, and cough on mucociliary clearance in patients with cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 153:1503–1509

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Homer JJ, Dowley AC, Condon L et al (2000) The effect of hypertonicity on nasal mucociliary clearance. Clin Otolaryngol 25:558–560

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Boek WM, Keles N, Graamans K et al (1999) Physiologic and hypertonic saline solutions impair ciliar activity in vitro. Laryngoscope 109:396–399

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wormald PJ, Cain T, Oates L et al (2004) A comparative study of three methods of nasal irrigation. Laryngoscope 114:2224–2227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Daviskas E, Anderson SD, Gonda I et al (1996) Inhalation of hypertonic saline aerosol enhances mucociliary clearance in asthmatic and healthy subjects. Eur Respir J 9:725–732

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Freidman M, Vidyasagar R, Joseph N (2006) A randomized, prospective, double-blind study on the efficiacy of Dead Sea salt nasal irrigations. Laryngoscope 116:878–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jose J, Ell SR (2003) The association of subjective nasal patency with peak inspiratory nasal flow in a large healthy population. Clin Otolaryngol 28:352–354

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Panagou P, Loukides S, Tsipra S et al (1998) The evaluation of nasal patency: comparison of patient and clinician assesments with rhinomanometry. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 118:847–851

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Baraniuk JN, Ali M, Naranch K (2002) Hypertonic saline nasal provocation and acoustic rhinometry. Clin Exp Allergy 32:543–550

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nilda Süslü.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Süslü, N., Bajin, M.D., Süslü, A.E. et al. Effects of buffered 2.3%, buffered 0.9%, and non-buffered 0.9% irrigation solutions on nasal mucosa after septoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266, 685–689 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-008-0807-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-008-0807-5

Keywords

Navigation