Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3569009.3573115acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Development of Interactive Hand Rehabilitation Tools Based on Activities of Daily Living

Published: 26 February 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Hand rehabilitation aims to improve patients’ hand and arm skills, improve adherence to training and increase their participation in activities of daily living (ADLs). A novel way of achieving this is to employ ADL-based interactive rehabilitation tools and show patients how their improved skills can be transferable to daily tasks. Hence, in this paper, we report the results of a set of studies carried out with six healthy individuals and two physiotherapists to discover the potential of integrating ADLs into interactive hand rehabilitation tools. Consequently, we designed two interactive drinking-based concepts and tested those with three stroke patients. We found that ADL-based training couples particularly well with functional training. Still, selecting appropriate functional exercises that match the ADL is an essential task to transfer training outcomes to a functional setting. Based on our findings, this paper highlights that ADL-based interactive hand rehabilitation training must minimally deviate from the original ADLs.

References

[1]
Irene Aprile, Marco Rabuffetti, Luca Padua, Enrica Di Sipio, Chiara Simbolotti, and Maurizio Ferrarin. 2014. Kinematic analysis of the upper limb motor strategies in stroke patients as a tool towards advanced neurorehabilitation strategies: a preliminary study. BioMed research international 2014 (2014).
[2]
Paul Bach-y Rita, Susie Wood, Ron Leder, Oscar Paredes, Dennis Bahr, Esther Wicab Bach-y Rita, and Narda Murillo. 2002. Computer-Assisted Motivating Rehabilitation (CAMR) for Institutional, Home, and Educational Late Stroke Programs. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 8, 4 (2002), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1310/HHAD-6TU3-GR8Q-YPVX
[3]
Madeline Balaam, Stefan Rennick Egglestone, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, Tom Rodden, Ann-Marie Hughes, Anna Wilkinson, Thomas Nind, Lesley Axelrod, Eric Harris, Ian Ricketts, 2011. Motivating mobility: designing for lived motivation in stroke rehabilitation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3073–3082.
[4]
Kathy Baxter, Catherine Courage, and Kelly Caine. 2015. Understanding your users: a practical guide to user research methods. Morgan Kaufmann.
[5]
Randall Beer, Jules Dewald, and Zev Rymer. 1999. Chapter 42 Disturbances of Voluntary Movement Coordination in Stroke: Problems of Planning or Execution?Vol. 123. Elsevier. 455–460 pages. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(08)62881-2
[6]
Carole A Bisogni, Laura Winter Falk, Elizabeth Madore, Christine E Blake, Margaret Jastran, Jeffery Sobal, and Carol M Devine. 2007. Dimensions of everyday eating and drinking episodes. Appetite 48, 2 (2007), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2006.09.004
[7]
Carole A. Bisogni, Laura Winter Falk, Elizabeth Madore, Christine E. Blake, Margaret Jastran, Jeffery Sobal, and Carol M. Devine. 2007. Dimensions of everyday eating and drinking episodes. Appetite 48, 2 (2007), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2006.09.004
[8]
Eva Carlsson, Anna Ehrenberg, and Margareta Ehnfors. 2004. Stroke and eating difficulties: long‐term experiences. Journal of Clinical Nursing 13, 7 (2004), 825–834. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01023.x
[9]
Yu Chen, Kingsley Travis Abel, John T. Janecek, Yunan Chen, Kai Zheng, and Steven C. Cramer. 2019. Home-based technologies for stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review. International journal of medical informatics 123 (2019), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.12.001
[10]
Hojjat Allah Haghgoo, Elmira Saed Pazuki, Ali S. Hosseini, and Mehdi Rassafiani. 2013. Depression, activities of daily living and quality of life in patients with stroke. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 328, 1 (2013), 87–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2013.02.027
[11]
Jocelyn E Harris and Janice J Eng. 2007. Paretic upper-limb strength best explains arm activity in people with stroke. Physical therapy 87, 1 (2007), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20060065
[12]
Samar M. Hatem, Geoffroy Saussez, Margaux della Faille, Vincent Prist, Xue Zhang, Delphine Dispa, and Yannick Bleyenheuft. 2016. Rehabilitation of Motor Function after Stroke: A Multiple Systematic Review Focused on Techniques to Stimulate Upper Extremity Recovery. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00442
[13]
Ananda Hochstenbach-Waelen and Henk A. M. Seelen. 2012. Embracing change: practical and theoretical considerations for successful implementation of technology assisting upper limb training in stroke. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 9, 1(2012), 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-9-52
[14]
RC Holt and RJ Holt. 2011. Gerotechnology: kitchen aids. European Geriatric Medicine 2, 4 (2011), 256–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurger.2011.01.019
[15]
YY Huang, KH Low, and Hup Boon Lim. 2009. Objective and quantitative assessment methodology of hand functions for rehabilitation. In 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics. IEEE, 846–851.
[16]
Veena Jayasree-Krishnan, Dhruv Gamdha, Brian S Goldberg, Shramana Ghosh, Preeti Raghavan, and Vikram Kapila. 2019. A novel task-specific upper-extremity rehabilitation system with interactive game-based interface for stroke patients. In 2019 International Symposium on Medical Robotics, ISMR 2019. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 8710184.
[17]
Mikko Kytö, Laura Maye, and David McGookin. 2019. Using Both Hands: Tangibles for Stroke Rehabilitation in the Home. Association for Computing Machinery, Paper 382. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300612
[18]
Peter Langhorne, Julie Bernhardt, and Gert Kwakkel. 2011. Stroke rehabilitation. The Lancet 377, 9778 (2011), 1693–1702. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60325-5
[19]
Mailin Lemke, Edgar Rodríguez Ramírez, and Brian Robinson. 2022. Manta and Cactaceae: Rehabilitative smartphone accessories for people with chronic mild stroke impairments. DRS2022: Bilbao 25(2022). https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2022.255
[20]
Mindy F. Levin. 1996. Interjoint coordination during pointing movements is disrupted in spastic hemiparesis. Brain 119, 1 (1996), 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/119.1.281
[21]
Firas Mawase, Kendra Cherry-Allen, Jing Xu, Manuel Anaya, Shintaro Uehara, and Pablo Celnik. 2020. Pushing the Rehabilitation Boundaries: Hand Motor Impairment Can Be Reduced in Chronic Stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 34, 8 (2020), 733–745. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968320939563
[22]
Nancy E. Mayo. 2016. Stroke Rehabilitation at Home. Stroke 47, 6 (2016), 1685–1691. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.011309
[23]
Jörgen Medin, Jenny Larson, Magnus Von Arbin, Regina Wredling, and Kerstin Tham. 2010. Striving for control in eating situations after stroke. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 24, 4 (2010), 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2010.00775.x
[24]
Kristine K Miller, Susan H Lin, and Marsha Neville. 2019. From hospital to home to participation: a position paper on transition planning poststroke. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 100, 6(2019), 1162–1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.10.017
[25]
Margit Alt Murphy, Steve Murphy, Hanna C. Persson, Ulla-Britt Bergström, and Katharina Stibrant Sunnerhagen. 2018. Kinematic Analysis Using 3D Motion Capture of Drinking Task in People With and Without Upper-extremity Impairments. Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE133 (2018), 57228. https://doi.org/10.3791/57228
[26]
Margit Alt Murphy, Carin Willén, and Katharina S. Sunnerhagen. 2011. Kinematic Variables Quantifying Upper-Extremity Performance After Stroke During Reaching and Drinking From a Glass. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 25, 1 (2011), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968310370748
[27]
Bridee A. Neibling, Sarah M. Jackson, Kathryn S. Hayward, and Ruth N. Barker. 2021. Perseverance with technology-facilitated home-based upper limb practice after stroke: a systematic mixed studies review. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 18, 1(2021), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00819-1
[28]
Sharon M. Nijenhuis, Gerdienke B. Prange, Farshid Amirabdollahian, Patrizio Sale, Francesco Infarinato, Nasrin Nasr, Gail Mountain, Hermie J. Hermens, Arno H. A. Stienen, Jaap H. Buurke, and Johan S. Rietman. 2015. Feasibility study into self-administered training at home using an arm and hand device with motivational gaming environment in chronic stroke. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 12, 1(2015), 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0080-y
[29]
April Oh, Temitope Erinosho, Genevieve Dunton, Frank M Perna, and David Berrigan. 2014. Cross-sectional examination of physical and social contexts of episodes of eating and drinking in a national sample of US adults. Public Health Nutrition 17, 12 (2014), 2721–2729. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980013003315
[30]
Michelle Pickrell. 2020. Design of Interactive Technology for Stroke Patient Rehabilitation. Ph. D. Dissertation.
[31]
Grada Berendina Prange, Laura Cornelia Smulders, J Van Wijngaarden, GJ Lijbers, SM Nijenhuis, PH Veltink, JH Buurke, and AHA Stienen. 2015. User requirements for assistance of the supporting hand in bimanual daily activities via a robotic glove for severely affected stroke patients. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR). IEEE, 357–361.
[32]
Pretti Raghavan. 2007. The nature of hand motor impairment after stroke and its treatment. Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine 9, 3 (2007), 221–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-007-0016-3
[33]
Teri Slade, Erin Duebel, and Jacalyn Ryan. 2022. “Your double-blind RCT needs feminism”: an argument for engaging critical theory in quantitative rehabilitation research. Disability and Rehabilitation(2022), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2022.2068679
[34]
Floor Stefess, Kostas Nizamis, Juliet Haarman, and Armağan Karahanoğlu. 2022. Gr! pp: Integrating Activities of Daily Living into Hand Rehabilitation. In Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. 1–6.
[35]
Annick A. A. Timmermans, Henk A. M. Seelen, Richard D. Willmann, Wilbert Bakx, Boris de Ruyter, Gerd Lanfermann, and Herman Kingma. 2009. Arm and hand skills: Training preferences after stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation 31, 16 (2009), 1344–1352. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280902823664
[36]
Annick A. A. Timmermans, Henk A. M. Seelen, Richard D. Willmann, and Herman Kingma. 2009. Technology-assisted training of arm-hand skills in stroke: concepts on reacquisition of motor control and therapist guidelines for rehabilitation technology design. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 6, 1(2009), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-6-1
[37]
Dinja J van der Veen, Carola ME Döpp, Petra C Siemonsma, Maria WG Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Bert JM de Swart, and Esther M Steultjens. 2019. Factors influencing the implementation of home-based stroke rehabilitation: professionals’ perspective. PloS one 14, 7 (2019), e0220226. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220226
[38]
Ioannis Vourganas, Vladimir Stankovic, Lina Stankovic, and Andrew Kerr. 2019. Factors That Contribute to the Use of Stroke Self-Rehabilitation Technologies: A Review. JMIR Biomed Eng 4, 1 (2019), e13732. https://doi.org/10.2196/13732
[39]
Grace Zhao, Carol Kennedy, Gracia Mabaya, Karen Okrainec, and Tara Kiran. 2019. Patient engagement in the development of best practices for transitions from hospital to home: a scoping review. BMJ open 9, 8 (2019), e029693. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029693

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
TEI '23: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction
February 2023
709 pages
ISBN:9781450399777
DOI:10.1145/3569009
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 February 2023

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. ADL-based training
  2. Hand rehabilitation
  3. interactive tools
  4. stroke
  5. tangible interaction

Qualifiers

  • Work in progress
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

TEI '23
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 393 of 1,367 submissions, 29%

Upcoming Conference

TEI '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 137
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)64
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7
Reflects downloads up to 26 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media