research-article

NVMM-Oriented Hierarchical Persistent Client Caching for Lustre

Authors:

André BrinkmannAuthors Info & Claims

ACM Transactions on Storage (TOS), Volume 17, Issue 1

Article No.: 6, Pages 1 - 22

https://doi.org/10.1145/3404190

Published: 18 January 2021 Publication History

Abstract

In high-performance computing (HPC), data and metadata are stored on special server nodes and client applications access the servers’ data and metadata through a network, which induces network latencies and resource contention. These server nodes are typically equipped with (slow) magnetic disks, while the client nodes store temporary data on fast SSDs or even on non-volatile main memory (NVMM). Therefore, the full potential of parallel file systems can only be reached if fast client side storage devices are included into the overall storage architecture.

In this article, we propose an NVMM-based hierarchical persistent client cache for the Lustre file system (NVMM-LPCC for short). NVMM-LPCC implements two caching modes: a read and write mode (RW-NVMM-LPCC for short) and a read only mode (RO-NVMM-LPCC for short). NVMM-LPCC integrates with the Lustre Hierarchical Storage Management (HSM) solution and the Lustre layout lock mechanism to provide consistent persistent caching services for I/O applications running on client nodes, meanwhile maintaining a global unified namespace of the entire Lustre file system. The evaluation results presented in this article show that NVMM-LPCC can increase the average read throughput by up to 35.80 times and the average write throughput by up to 9.83 times compared with the native Lustre system, while providing excellent scalability.

References

[1]

Hiroyuki Akinaga and Hisashi Shima. 2010. Resistive random access memory (ReRAM) based on metal oxides. Proc. IEEE 98, 12 (2010), 2237--2251.

[2]

Jens Axboe. 2019. fio: Flexible I/O Tester. Retrieved from git://git.kernel.dk/fio.git.

[3]

Francieli Zanon Boito, Eduardo C. Inacio, Jean Luca Bez, Philippe O. A. Navaux, Mario A. R. Dantas, and Yves Denneulin. 2018. A checkpoint of research on parallel I/O for high-performance computing. ACM Comput. Surv. 51, 2 (2018), 23:1–23:35.

Digital Library

[4]

Peter Braam. 2005. The Lustre storage architecture. CoRR abs/1903.01955. http://arxiv.org/abs/1903.01955

[5]

André Brinkmann, Kathryn Mohror, Weikuan Yu, Philip H. Carns, Toni Cortes, Scott Klasky, Alberto Miranda, Franz-Josef Pfreundt, Robert B. Ross, and Marc-Andre Vef. 2020. Ad hoc file systems for high-performance computing. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 35, 1 (2020), 4--26.

Digital Library

[6]

Youmin Chen, Jiwu Shu, Jiaxin Ou, and Youyou Lu. 2018. HiNFS: A persistent memory file system with both buffering and direct-access. ACM Transactions on Storage (ToS) 14, 1 (2018), 4:1–4:30.

Digital Library

[7]

Giuseppe Congiu, Sai Narasimhamurthy, Tim Süß, and André Brinkmann. 2016. Improving collective I/O performance using non-volatile memory devices. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing (CLUSTER), Taipei, Taiwan, September 12–16. 120--129.

[8]

Mingkai Dong, Heng Bu, Jifei Yi, Benchao Dong, and Haibo Chen. 2019. Performance and protection in the ZoFS user-space NVM file system. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (SOSP), Huntsville, ON, Canada, October 27–30. 478--493.

Digital Library

[9]

Subramanya R. Dulloor, Sanjay Kumar, Anil S. Keshavamurthy, Philip Lantz, Dheeraj Reddy, Rajesh Sankaran, and Jeff Jackson. 2014. System software for persistent memory. In Proceedings of the 9th Eurosys Conference 2014, EuroSys 2014, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, April 13–16. 15:1–15:15.

Digital Library

[10]

Marc Eshel, Roger L. Haskin, Dean Hildebrand, Manoj Naik, Frank B. Schmuck, and Renu Tewari. 2010. Panache: A parallel file system cache for global file access. In Proceedings of the 8th USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies, San Jose, CA, February 23–26. 155--168.

Digital Library

[11]

Herodotos Herodotou and Elena Kakoulli. 2019. Automating distributed tiered storage management in cluster computing. In Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 13, 1 (Sept. 2019), 43--56.

Digital Library

[12]

Morteza Hoseinzadeh. 2019. A survey on tiering and caching in high-performance storage systems. CoRR abs/1904.11560 (2019).

[13]

David Howells. 2006. Fs-cache: A network filesystem caching facility. In Proceedings of the Linux Symposium, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 427--440.

[14]

Jian Huang, Karsten Schwan, and Moinuddin K. Qureshi. 2014. NVRAM-aware logging in transaction systems. In Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 8, 4 (2014), 389--400.

Digital Library

[15]

Nusrat Sharmin Islam, Md. Wasi-ur-Rahman, Xiaoyi Lu, and Dhabaleswar K. Panda. 2016. High performance design for HDFS with byte-addressability of NVM and RDMA. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Supercomputing, ICS 2016, Istanbul, Turkey, June 1–3. 8:1–8:14.

Digital Library

[16]

Adrian Jackson, Michèle Weiland, Mark Parsons, and Bernhard Homoelle. 2018. Architectures for high performance computing and data systems using byte-addressable persistent memory. CoRR abs/1805.10041.

[17]

Krish K. R., Bharti Wadhwa, M. Safdar Iqbal, M. Mustafa Rafique, and Ali Raza Butt. 2016. On efficient hierarchical storage for big data processing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 16th International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGrid), Cartagena, Colombia, May 16–19. 403--408.

Digital Library

[18]

Rohan Kadekodi, Se Kwon Lee, Sanidhya Kashyap, Taesoo Kim, Aasheesh Kolli, and Vijay Chidambaram. 2019. SplitFS: Reducing software overhead in file systems for persistent memory. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (SOSP), Huntsville, ON, Canada, October 27–30. 494--508.

Digital Library

[19]

Benjamin C. Lee, Engin Ipek, Onur Mutlu, and Doug Burger. 2009. Architecting phase change memory as a scalable dram alternative. In Proceedings of the 36th International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA), June 20–24, Austin, TX. 2--13.

Digital Library

[20]

Ning Liu, Jason Cope, Philip H. Carns, Christopher D. Carothers, Robert B. Ross, Gary Grider, Adam Crume, and Carlos Maltzahn. 2012. On the role of burst buffers in leadership-class storage systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE 28th Symposium on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST), April 16–20, Asilomar Conference Grounds, Pacific Grove, CA. 1--11.

[21]

Youyou Lu, Jiwu Shu, Youmin Chen, and Tao Li. 2017. Octopus: An RDMA-enabled distributed persistent memory file system. In Proceedings of the 2017 USENIX Annual Technical Conference (ATC), Santa Clara, CA, July 12–14. 773--785.

Digital Library

[22]

Amirsaman Memaripour and Steven Swanson. 2018. Breeze: User-level access to non-volatile main memories for legacy software. In Proceedings of the 36th IEEE International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD), Orlando, FL, October 7–10. 413--422.

[23]

Thomas Mikolajick, Christine Dehm, Walter Hartner, Ivan Kasko, M. J. Kastner, Nicolas Nagel, Manfred Moert, and Carlos Mazure. 2001. FeRAM technology for high density applications. Microelectron. Reliab. 41, 7 (2001), 947--950.

[24]

Yingjin Qian, Xi Li, Shuichi Ihara, Andreas Dilger, Carlos Thomaz, Shilong Wang, Wen Cheng, Chunyan Li, Lingfang Zeng, Fang Wang, Dan Feng, Tim Süß, and André Brinkmann. 2019. LPCC: Hierarchical persistent client caching for lustre. In Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, SC 2019, Denver, Colorado, November 17–19. 88:1–88:14.

Digital Library

[25]

Yingjin Qian, Xi Li, Shuichi Ihara, Lingfang Zeng, Jürgen Kaiser, Tim Süß, and André Brinkmann. 2017. A configurable rule based classful token bucket filter network request scheduler for the lustre file system. In Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (SC), Denver, CO, November 12–17. 6:1–6:12.

Digital Library

[26]

Frank B. Schmuck and Roger L. Haskin. 2002. GPFS: A shared-disk file system for large computing clusters. In Proceedings of the FAST ’02 Conference on File and Storage Technologies, January 28–30, Monterey, California. 231--244.

Digital Library

[27]

Hongzhang Shan and John Shalf. 2007. Using IOR to Analyze the I/O Performance for HPC Platforms. In Proceedings of the Cray Users Group Meeting (CUG'07), Seattle, Washington, may 7-10. https://crd.lbl.gov/assets/pubs_presos/CDS/ATG/cug07shan.pdf.

[28]

Yizhou Shan, Shin-Yeh Tsai, and Yiying Zhang. 2017. Distributed shared persistent memory. In Proceedings of the 2017 Symposium on Cloud Computing (SoCC), Santa Clara, CA, September 24–27. 323--337.

Digital Library

[29]

Liu Shi, Zhenjun Liu, and Lu Xu. 2012. BWCC: A FS-cache based cooperative caching system for network storage system. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing. IEEE.

Digital Library

[30]

Vasily Tarasov, Erez Zadok, and Spencer Shepler. 2016. Filebench: A flexible framework for file system benchmarking. ;login: 41, 1 (2016), 6--12.

[31]

Marc-Andre Vef, Nafiseh Moti, Tim Süß, Markus Tacke, Tommaso Tocci, Ramon Nou, Alberto Miranda, Toni Cortes, and André Brinkmann. 2020. GekkoFS—A temporary burst buffer file system for HPC applications. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 35, 1 (2020), 72--91.

[32]

Marc-Andre Vef, Vasily Tarasov, Dean Hildebrand, and André Brinkmann. 2018. Challenges and solutions for tracing storage systems: A case study with spectrum scale. ACM Trans. Storage (TOS) 14, 2 (2018), 18:1–18:24.

Digital Library

[33]

Haris Volos, Sanketh Nalli, Sankaralingam Panneerselvam, Venkatanathan Varadarajan, Prashant Saxena, and Michael M. Swift. 2014. Aerie: Flexible file-system interfaces to storage-class memory. In Proceedings of the 9th Eurosys Conference 2014 (EuroSys), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, April 13–16. 14:1–14:14.

Digital Library

[34]

Haris Volos, Andres Jaan Tack, and Michael M. Swift. 2011. Mnemosyne: Lightweight persistent memory. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS), Newport Beach, CA, March 5–11. 91--104.

Digital Library

[35]

Lipeng Wan, Qing Cao, Feiyi Wang, and Sarp Oral. 2017. Optimizing checkpoint data placement with guaranteed burst buffer endurance in large-scale hierarchical storage systems. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 100 (2017), 16--29.

Digital Library

[36]

Teng Wang, Kathryn Mohror, Adam Moody, Kento Sato, and Weikuan Yu. 2016. An ephemeral burst-buffer file system for scientific applications. In Proceeding of the ACM/IEEE International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (SC). IEEE.

Digital Library

[37]

Xue Wei and Li Xi. 2017. LCOC: Lustre Cache on Client based on SSD. Retrieved from http://wiki.lustre.org/Lustre_Administrator_and_Developer_Workshop_2017.

[38]

Matthew Wilcox. 2014. Add Support for NV-DIMMs to Ext4. Retrieved from https://lwn.net/Articles/613384/.

[39]

H.-S. Philip Wong, Simone Raoux, SangBum Kim, Jiale Liang, John P. Reifenberg, Bipin Rajendran, Mehdi Asheghi, and Kenneth E. Goodson. 2010. Phase change memory. In Proceedings of the IEEE 98, 12 (2010), 2201--2227.

[40]

Li Xi. 2018. Lustre Persistent Client Cache: A client side cache that speeds up applications with certain I/O patterns. Retrieved from http://opensfs.org/lug-2018-agenda/.

[41]

Jian Xu and Steven Swanson. 2016. NOVA: A log-structured file system for hybrid volatile/non-volatile main memories. In Proceedings of the 14th USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies (FAST), Santa Clara, CA, February 22--25. 323--338.

Digital Library

[42]

Jiachen Zhang, Peng Li, Bo Liu, Trent G. Marbach, Xiaoguang Liu, and Gang Wang. 2018. Performance analysis of 3D XPoint SSDs in virtualized and non-virtualized environments. In Proceedings of the 24th IEEE International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS), Singapore, December 11–13. 51--60.

Cited By

Ye XZhang HWang JZhang YDu XWu H(2024)Study on tiered storage algorithm based on heat correlation of astronomical dataFrontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences10.3389/fspas.2024.137124911Online publication date: 14-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2024.1371249
Ajdari MPeykani Sani PMoradi AKhanalizadeh Imani MBazkhanei AAsadi HAamodt TJerger NSwift M(2023)Re-architecting I/O Caches for Emerging Fast Storage DevicesProceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, Volume 310.1145/3582016.3582041(542-555)Online publication date: 25-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3582016.3582041
Dai HWang YKent KZeng LXu C(2022)The State of the Art of Metadata Managements in Large-Scale Distributed File Systems — Scalability, Performance and AvailabilityIEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems10.1109/TPDS.2022.317057433:12(3850-3869)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPDS.2022.3170574
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

NVMM-Oriented Hierarchical Persistent Client Caching for Lustre
1. Information systems
  1. Information storage systems
    1. Storage architectures
      1. Distributed storage
    2. Storage management
      1. Hierarchical storage management
2. Software and its engineering
  1. Software organization and properties
    1. Contextual software domains
      1. Operating systems
        File systems management

Recommendations

LPCC: hierarchical persistent client caching for lustre
SC '19: Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis

Most high-performance computing (HPC) clusters use a global parallel file system to enable high data throughput. The parallel file system is typically centralized and its storage media are physically separated from the compute cluster. Compute nodes as ...
Provisioning ZFS Pools On Lustre
PEARC '19: Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing 2019: Rise of the Machines (learning)

While Lustre's parallelism, performance, and scalability make it desirable as a storage solution for clusters, its limitations prevent it from being suitable as a general purpose storage for all of a cluster's needs. In particular, Lustre's relatively ...
Benchmarking SSD-Based Lustre File System Configurations
XSEDE '14: Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Conference on Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment

Due to recent development efforts, ZFS on Linux is now a viable alternative to the traditional ldiskfs backend used for production Lustre file systems. Certain ZFS features, such as copy-on-write, make it even more appealing for systems utilizing SSD ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Storage

ACM Transactions on Storage Volume 17, Issue 1

Special Section on Usenix Fast 2020

February 2021

165 pages

ISSN:1553-3077

EISSN:1553-3093

DOI:10.1145/3446939

Editor:
Sam H. Noh
Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, Republic of Korea

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2021 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 January 2021

Accepted: 01 June 2020

Revised: 01 March 2020

Received: 01 November 2019

Published in TOS Volume 17, Issue 1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed

Funding Sources

National Natural Science Foundation of China
Hubei Natural Science Foundation

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

7
Total Citations
View Citations
528
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)78
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9

Reflects downloads up to 27 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Ye XZhang HWang JZhang YDu XWu H(2024)Study on tiered storage algorithm based on heat correlation of astronomical dataFrontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences10.3389/fspas.2024.137124911Online publication date: 14-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2024.1371249
Ajdari MPeykani Sani PMoradi AKhanalizadeh Imani MBazkhanei AAsadi HAamodt TJerger NSwift M(2023)Re-architecting I/O Caches for Emerging Fast Storage DevicesProceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, Volume 310.1145/3582016.3582041(542-555)Online publication date: 25-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3582016.3582041
Dai HWang YKent KZeng LXu C(2022)The State of the Art of Metadata Managements in Large-Scale Distributed File Systems — Scalability, Performance and AvailabilityIEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems10.1109/TPDS.2022.317057433:12(3850-3869)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPDS.2022.3170574
Garcia-Blas JMunoz JCarretero JMarozzo FTalia DTrunfio PFernandez-Pena Ade Blas D(2022)Convergence of HPC and Big Data in extreme-scale data analysis through the DCEx programming model2022 IEEE 34th International Symposium on Computer Architecture and High Performance Computing (SBAC-PAD)10.1109/SBAC-PAD55451.2022.00024(130-139)Online publication date: Nov-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/SBAC-PAD55451.2022.00024
Lee JLee HYu H(2022)Fine-Grained I/O Traffic Control Middleware for I/O Fairness in Virtualized SystemIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2022.318773110(73122-73144)Online publication date: 2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3187731
Qian LQu ZCai MYe BWang XWu JDuan WZhao MLin Q(2022)FastCache: A write-optimized edge storage system via concurrent merging cache for IoT applicationsJournal of Systems Architecture10.1016/j.sysarc.2022.102718131(102718)Online publication date: Oct-2022
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysarc.2022.102718
Qian LYe BWang XQu ZDuan WZhao M(2022)FastCache: A Client-Side Cache with Variable-Position Merging Schema in Network Storage SystemAlgorithms and Architectures for Parallel Processing10.1007/978-3-030-95388-1_10(144-160)Online publication date: 23-Feb-2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95388-1_10

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents