Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article
Free access
Just Accepted

Multivocal Exhibition: Exploring Cultural Perspectives through User-Curated Art Exhibitions

Online AM: 20 July 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Recently, cultural institutions have seen a rise in citizen curation projects, where people actively engage in curating and interpreting cultural artifacts. Citizen curation involves using collective knowledge and shared interests to create rich narratives around heritage items. This approach values the diverse perspectives individuals bring to preserving and representing culture. In this work, we investigate the potential of citizen curation applied to the subjective and culturally bound topic of symbolism. To do so, we present a pilot study on the development and user testing of the Multivocal Exhibition application. This application allows users to curate their art exhibitions by picking one theme and three cultural contexts that spark their interest. The app then selects artworks and symbolic data from HyperReal (cultural symbolism knowledge graph), Wikidata, and the National Museum of World Cultures (NMVW) to create a 3D environment featuring three artworks that symbolically convey the chosen theme from the perspective of the selected cultural contexts. The purpose of this app is to foster an open dialogue about the uniqueness and similarities of cultures, and promote inclusivity and cultural awareness, by showing how artifacts and what they depict can be interpreted in different cultural contexts, according to their symbology. Multivocal exhibition was tested by 12 users divided into 6 groups. The evaluation is based on the interaction between the users and the application, the analysis of the dialogues that were prompted utilizing the app, and an interview after trying two scenarios. Our results show how serendipity and surprise emerge as central themes in the cross-cultural experiences of the users. These elements play an indispensable role in cultivating engagement through symbolism, enriching users’ comprehension of diverse cultures, and heightening overall engagement. Moreover, the cognitive gap intentionally created by the app —triggering questions about why specific symbols convey particular meanings within certain contexts— proves to be a potent stimulus for user curiosity and engagement. We report additional findings, lessons learned and future work at the end of the paper.

References

[1]
D. Aiello, S. Fai, and C. Santagati. 2019. VIRTUAL MUSEUMS AS A MEANS FOR PROMOTION AND ENHANCEMENT OF CULTURAL HERITAGE. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XLII-2/W15 (2019), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W15-33-2019
[2]
Sofia Baroncini, Bruno Sartini, Marieke van Erp, Francesca Tomasi, and Aldo Gangemi. 2023. Is dc:subject enough? A Landscape on Iconography and Iconology statements of Knowledge Graphs in the Semantic Web. Journal of Documentation 79, 7 (2023), 115–136. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-09-2022-0207
[3]
Federico Bertola and Viviana Patti. 2016. Ontology-based affective models to organize artworks in the social semantic web. Information Processing & Management 52, 1 (2016), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2015.10.003 Emotion and Sentiment in Social and Expressive Media.
[4]
E. Bhaveeasheshwar and Gerard Deepak. 2023. OISHI: An Ontology Integration Framework for Domains of Socio-Humanitarian Importance Incorporating Hybrid Machine Intelligence. In Electronic Governance with Emerging Technologies, Fernando Ortiz-Rodríguez, Sanju Tiwari, Patience Usoro Usip, and Raul Palma (Eds.). Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 155–167.
[5]
Luis Emilio Bruni, Enrico Daga, Rossana Damiano, Lily Diaz, Tsvi Kuflik, Antonio Lieto, Aldo Gangemi, Paul Mulholland, Silvio Peroni, Sofia Pescarin, and Alan Wecker. 2020. Towards Advanced Interfaces for Citizen Curation. In AVI2CH 2020: Workshop on Advanced Visual Interfaces and Interactions in Cultural Heritage (AVI2CH 2020: Workshop on Advanced Visual Interfaces and Interactions in Cultural Heritage). CEUR-WS, Aachen, Germany., Paper 7. https://oro.open.ac.uk/72524/
[6]
Ann Murphy Burroughs and Bill Sitzer. 2022. Creating Interfaith Dialogue in Art Museums: A Community and Museum Collaboration. Journal of Museum Education 47, 2 (April 2022), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/10598650.2022.2044610
[7]
Gunho Chae, Jaram Park, Juyong Park, Woon Seung Yeo, and Chungkon Shi. 2016. Linking and clustering artworks using social tags: Revitalizing crowd-sourced information on cultural collections. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67, 4 (2016), 885–899. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23442 arXiv:https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/asi.23442
[8]
Jacob Cohen. 1960. A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20, 1 (April 1960), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
[9]
Rossana Damiano, Tsvi Kuflik, Alan J. Wecker, Manuel Striani, Antonio Lieto, Luis Bruni, Nele Kadastik, and Thomas A. Pedersen. 2022. Exploring Values in Museum Artifacts in the SPICE Project: A Preliminary Study. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 30th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (Barcelona, Spain) (UMAP ’22 Adjunct). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 391–396. https://doi.org/10.1145/3511047.3537662
[10]
Belen Diaz-Agudo, Alessio Bosca, Andrea Bolioli, Guilermo Jimenez Jimenez Diaz, Tsvi Kuflik, and Alan J. Wecker. 2021. Towards Personalized Social Recommendations for Cultural Heritage Activities: Methods and Technology to Enable Cohesive and Inclusive Recommendations. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (Utrecht, Netherlands) (UMAP ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 199–202. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450614.3463389
[11]
Cynthia Foronda. 2019. A Theory of Cultural Humility. Journal of Transcultural Nursing 31, 1 (Sept. 2019), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659619875184
[12]
Cynthia Foronda, Diana-Lyn Baptiste, Maren M. Reinholdt, and Kevin Ousman. 2015. Cultural Humility: A Concept Analysis. Journal of Transcultural Nursing 27, 3 (June 2015), 210–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659615592677
[13]
Cynthia L. Foronda, Diana-Lyn Baptiste, Teresa Pfaff, Roseann Velez, Maren Reinholdt, Michael Sanchez, and Krysia Warren Hudson. 2018. Cultural Competency and Cultural Humility in Simulation-Based Education: An Integrative Review. Clinical Simulation in Nursing 15 (Feb. 2018), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2017.09.006
[14]
Thaïs Grandisoli. 2021. The Controversy Over the Term ’Citizen Science’. CBC News. https://www.cbc.ca/news/science/what-on-earth-citizen-science-community-1.6139049
[15]
Han-Yin Huang and Cynthia C. S. Liem. 2022. Social Inclusion in Curated Contexts: Insights from Museum Practices. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT ’22). ACM, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533095
[16]
Nele Kadastik, Thomas Anthony Pedersen, and Luis Emilio Bruni. 2023. Citizen Curation Methods for Interpretation and Reflection on Cultural Heritage: Insights from SPICE. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 31st ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (Limassol, Cyprus) (UMAP ’23 Adjunct). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 367–373. https://doi.org/10.1145/3563359.3596668
[17]
Antonio Lieto, Gian Luca Pozzato, Manuel Striani, Stefano Zoia, and Rossana Damiano. 2023. DEGARI 2.0: A diversity-seeking, explainable, and affective art recommender for social inclusion. Cognitive Systems Research 77 (2023), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2022.10.001
[18]
Peng Liu and Lan Lan. 2021. Museum as multisensorial site: story co-making and the affective interrelationship between museum visitors, heritage space, and digital storytelling. Museum Management and Curatorship 36, 4 (2021), 403–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2021.1948905
[19]
Rhiannon Mason. 2004. Museums, galleries and heritage: Sites of meaning-making and communication. In Heritage, museums and galleries. Routledge, London, England, 221–237.
[20]
Marry L. McHugh. 2012. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica 22, 3 (2012), 276–282. https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2012.031
[21]
Daniele Monaco, Maria Angela Pellegrino, Vittorio Scarano, and Luca Vicidomini. 2022. Linked open data in authoring virtual exhibitions. Journal of Cultural Heritage 53 (2022), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2021.11.002
[22]
Paul Mulholland, Adam Stoneman, Naomi Barker, Mark Maguire, Jason Carvalho, Enrico Daga, and Paul Warren. 2023. The Sound of Paintings: Using Citizen Curation to Explore the Cross-Modal Personalization of Museum Experiences. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 31st ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (Limassol, Cyprus) (UMAP ’23 Adjunct). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 408–418. https://doi.org/10.1145/3563359.3596662
[23]
Paul Mulholland, Adam Stoneman, Jason Carvalho, Enrico Daga, and Mark Maguire. 2023. Deep Viewpoints: Scripted Support for the Citizen Curation of Museum Artworks. In Proceedings of the 34th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, United States, 1–11.
[24]
Johan Oomen and Lora Aroyo. 2011. Crowdsourcing in the cultural heritage domain: opportunities and challenges. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Communities and Technologies. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, United States, 138–149.
[25]
Erwin Panofsky. 1972. Studies in iconology: humanistic themes in the art of the Renaissance. Westview Press, Boulder, Colo.
[26]
Anna Maria Polli, Matthias Korn, and Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose. 2013. Local Area Artworks: Collaborative Art Interpretation on-Site. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing Adjunct Publication (Zurich, Switzerland) (UbiComp ’13 Adjunct). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 79–82. https://doi.org/10.1145/2494091.2494114
[27]
Bruno Sartini. 2023. Connecting works of art within the semantic web of symbolic meanings. Ph. D. Dissertation. Alma Mater Studiorium, University of Bologna. https://doi.org/10.48676/unibo/amsdottorato/11020
[28]
Bruno Sartini. 2024. IICONGRAPH: Improved Iconographic and Iconological Statements in Knowledge Graphs. In The Semantic Web, Albert Meroño Peñuela, Anastasia Dimou, Raphaël Troncy, Olaf Hartig, Maribel Acosta, Mehwish Alam, Heiko Paulheim, and Pasquale Lisena (Eds.). Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60635-9_4
[29]
Bruno Sartini and Sofia Baroncini. 2023. A Comparative Study of Simple and Complex Art Interpretations in Linked Open Data Using ICON Ontology. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Semantic Web and Ontology Design for Cultural Heritage co-located with the International Semantic Web Conference 2023 (ISWC 2023). CEUR Workshop. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3540/paper4.pdf
[30]
Bruno Sartini, Sofia Baroncini, Marieke van Erp, Francesca Tomasi, and Aldo Gangemi. 2023. ICON: An Ontology for Comprehensive Artistic Interpretations. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 16, 3, Article 59 (aug 2023), 38 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3594724
[31]
Bruno Sartini, Aldo Gangemi, et al. 2021. Towards the unchaining of symbolism from knowledge graphs: how symbolic relationships can link cultures. In Book of extended abstracts of the 10th national AIUCD conference. AIUCD, Pisa. 576–580.
[32]
Bruno Sartini, Marieke van Erp, and Aldo Gangemi. 2021. Marriage is a Peach and a Chalice: Modelling Cultural Symbolism on the Semantic Web. In Proceedings of the 11th on Knowledge Capture Conference (Virtual Event, USA) (K-CAP ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1145/3460210.3493552
[33]
Benjamin Saunders, Julius Sim, Tom Kingstone, Shula Baker, Jackie Waterfield, Bernadette Bartlam, Heather Burroughs, and Clare Jinks. 2017. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity 52, 4 (Sept. 2017), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
[34]
Unity Technologies. 2023. Unity.com. https://unity.com/products/unity-engine
[35]
Miguel Torres-Ruiz, Felix Mata, Roberto Zagal, Giovanni Guzmán, Rolando Quintero, and Marco Moreno-Ibarra. 2020. A recommender system to generate museum itineraries applying augmented reality and social-sensor mining techniques. Virtual Reality 24 (2020), 175–189.
[36]
Foteini Valeonti, AP Hudson-Smith, Melissa Terras, and Chrysanthi Zarkali. 2018. Reaping the Benefits of Digitisation: Pilot study exploring revenue generation from digitised collections through technological innovation. In Electronic Visualisation and the Arts (EVA 2018). BCS Learning and Development Ltd, 56–63.
[37]
Marieke van Erp and Victor de Boer. 2021. A polyvocal and contextualised semantic web. In The Semantic Web: 18th International Conference, ESWC 2021, Virtual Event, June 6–10, 2021, Proceedings 18. Springer, 506–512.
[38]
Roelof Van Straten. 2012. An Introduction to Iconography: Symbols, Allusions and Meaning in the Visual Arts. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=none&isbn=9781136614033 OCLC: 1100455525.
[39]
Gautam Vishwanath. 2023. Enhancing Engagement through Digital Cultural Heritage: A Case Study about Senior Citizens using a Virtual Reality Museum. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences (IMX ’23). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3573381.3596154

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage
Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage  Just Accepted
EISSN:1556-4711
Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Online AM: 20 July 2024
Accepted: 10 July 2024
Revised: 07 March 2024
Received: 15 October 2023

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Symbolism
  2. Knowledge Graphs
  3. Linked Open Data
  4. 3D
  5. Citizen Curation
  6. User Study

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 173
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)173
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)47
Reflects downloads up to 19 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media