Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Control of robotic mobility-on-demand systems: : A queueing-theoretical perspective

Published: 01 January 2016 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper we present queueing-theoretical methods for the modeling, analysis, and control of autonomous mobility-on-demand (MOD) systems wherein robotic, self-driving vehicles transport customers within an urban environment and rebalance themselves to ensure acceptable quality of service throughout the network. We first cast an autonomous MOD system within a closed Jackson network model with passenger loss. It is shown that an optimal rebalancing algorithm minimizing the number of (autonomously) rebalancing vehicles while keeping vehicle availabilities balanced throughout the network can be found by solving a linear program. The theoretical insights are used to design a robust, real-time rebalancing algorithm, which is applied to a case study of New York City and implemented on an eight-vehicle mobile robot testbed. The case study of New York shows that the current taxi demand in Manhattan can be met with about 8,000 robotic vehicles (roughly 70% of the size of the current taxi fleet operating in Manhattan). Finally, we extend our queueing-theoretical setup to include congestion effects, and study the impact of autonomously rebalancing vehicles on overall congestion. Using a simple heuristic algorithm, we show that additional congestion due to autonomous rebalancing can be effectively avoided on a road network. Collectively, this paper provides a rigorous approach to the problem of system-wide coordination of autonomously driving vehicles, and provides one of the first characterizations of the sustainability benefits of robotic transportation networks.

References

[1]
Aslam J, Lim S, and Rus D (2012) Congestion-aware traffic routing system using sensor data. In: 15th international IEEE conference on intelligent transportation systems, pp. 1006–1013.
[2]
Barth M, Han J, and Todd M (2001) Performance evaluation of a multi-station shared vehicle system. In: Proceedings of IEEE intelligent transportation systems, pp. 1218–1223.
[3]
Berbeglia G, Cordeau JF, and Laporte G (2010) Dynamic pickup and delivery problems. European Journal of Operational Research 202(1): 8–15.
[4]
Bertsekas DP, Gallager RG, and Humblet P (1992) Data networks, vol. 2. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall International.
[5]
Bullo F, Frazzoli E, Pavone M, Savla K, and Smith SL (2011) Dynamic vehicle routing for robotic systems. Proceedings of the IEEE 99(9): 1482–1504.
[6]
Bureau of Public Roads (1964) Traffic Assignment Manual. US Department of Commerce.
[7]
Burns L, Jordan W, and Scarborough B (2013) Transforming personal mobility. The Earth Institute – Columbia University.
[8]
Campbell T, Liu M, Kulis B, How JP, and Carin L (2013) Dynamic clustering via asymptotics of the dependent Dirichlet process mixture. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 449–457.
[9]
CAR2GO (2011) CAR2GO Austin. Car Sharing 2.0: Great Idea for a Great City. Technical report. http://www.car2go.com/austin/en/
[10]
Dell’Amico M, Hadjicostantinou E, Iori M, and Novellani S (2014) The bike sharing rebalancing problem: Mathematical formulations and benchmark instances. Omega 45(0): 7–19.
[11]
Di Gaspero L, Rendl A, and Urli T (2013) Constraint-based approaches for balancing bike sharing systems. In: Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8124). Berlin: Springer, pp. 758–773.
[12]
Fisher A (2013) Inside Google’s Quest To Popularize Self-Driving Cars. Popular Science (Online Article) http://www.popsci.com/cars/article/2013-09/google-self-driving-car
[13]
Fricker C and Gast N (2012) Incentives and redistribution in homogeneous bike-sharing systems with stations of finite capacity. EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics.
[14]
George DK and Xia CH (2011) Fleet-sizing and service availability for a vehicle rental system via closed queueing networks. European Journal of Operational Research 211(1): 198–207.
[15]
[16]
Huang H and Lam WHK (2002) Modeling and solving the dynamic user equilibrium route and departure time choice problem in network with queues. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 36(3): 253–273.
[17]
Induct (2013) Navia - The 100% Electric Automated Transport. Online Article, http://induct-technology.com/en/products/navia-the-100-electric-automated-transport
[18]
Janson BN (1991) Dynamic traffic assignment for urban road networks. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 25(2): 143–161.
[19]
Kulis B and Jordan MI (2012) Revisiting k-means: New algorithms via Bayesian nonparametrics. In: Proceedings of the 29th international conference on machine learning, pp. 513–520.
[20]
Larson RC and Odoni AR (1981) Urban operations research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[21]
Lavenberg SS (1983) Computer performance modeling handbook, volume 4. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
[22]
Lieu H (2003) Revised monograph on traffic flow theory. US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration.
[23]
Madanat SM, Cassidy MJ, and Wang M (1994) Probabilistic delay model at stop-controlled intersection. Journal of Transportation Engineering 120(1): 21–36.
[24]
Meyer CD (2000) Matrix Analysis and Applied Linear Algebra. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
[25]
Mitchell WJ, Borroni-Bird CE, and Burns LD (2010) Reinventing the Automobile: Personal Urban Mobility for the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
[26]
Pavone M, Frazzoli E, and Bullo F (2011) Adaptive and distributed algorithms for vehicle routing in a stochastic and dynamic environment. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 56(6): 1259–1274.
[27]
Pavone M, Smith SL, Frazzoli E, and Rus D (2012) Robotic load balancing for mobility-on-demand systems. The International Journal of Robotics Research 31(7): 839–854.
[28]
Reiser M and Lavenberg SS (1980) Mean-value analysis of closed multichain queuing networks. Journal of the ACM 27(2): 313–322.
[29]
Serfozo R (1999) Introduction to stochastic networks, volume 44. New York: Springer.
[30]
Smith SL, Pavone M, Schwager E, Frazzoli E, and Rus D (2013) Rebalancing the rebalancers: Optimally routing vehicles and drivers in mobility-on-demand systems. In: American control conference, pp. 2362–2367.
[31]
Spieser K, Treleaven K, Zhang R, Frazzoli E, Morton D, and Pavone M (2014) Toward a systematic approach to the design and evaluation of automated mobility-on-demand systems: a case study in Singapore. In: Springer Lecture Notes in Mobility. New York: Springer.
[32]
Treleaven K, Pavone M, and Frazzoli E (2013) Asymptotically optimal algorithms for pickup and delivery problems with application to large-scale transportation systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 58(9): 2261–2276.
[33]
UN (2011) World Urbanization Prospects: The 2011 Revision Population Database. Technical report, United Nations, http://esa.un.org/unup/
[34]
Waserhole A and Jost V (2013) Pricing in vehicle sharing systems: Optimization in queuing networks with product forms. OSP hal-00751744v4, http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr
[35]
Zhang R and Pavone M (2014) Control of robotic mobility-on-demand systems: a queueing-theoretical perspective. In: Robotics: science and systems conference.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Fair Ride Allocation on a LineACM Transactions on Economics and Computation10.1145/370849113:1(1-31)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2025
  • (2024)Safe Model-Based Multi-Agent Mean-Field Reinforcement LearningProceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/3635637.3662952(973-982)Online publication date: 6-May-2024
  • (2024)Surge Routing: Event-informed Multiagent Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous RideshareProceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/3635637.3662916(641-650)Online publication date: 6-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Control of robotic mobility-on-demand systems: A queueing-theoretical perspective
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

            Information & Contributors

            Information

            Published In

            cover image International Journal of Robotics Research
            International Journal of Robotics Research  Volume 35, Issue 1-3
            Jan 2016
            299 pages

            Publisher

            Sage Publications, Inc.

            United States

            Publication History

            Published: 01 January 2016

            Author Tags

            1. Self-driving cars
            2. intelligent transportation systems
            3. vehicle routing
            4. queueing networks
            5. autonomous systems

            Qualifiers

            • Research-article

            Contributors

            Other Metrics

            Bibliometrics & Citations

            Bibliometrics

            Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
            Reflects downloads up to 23 Feb 2025

            Other Metrics

            Citations

            Cited By

            View all
            • (2025)Fair Ride Allocation on a LineACM Transactions on Economics and Computation10.1145/370849113:1(1-31)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2025
            • (2024)Safe Model-Based Multi-Agent Mean-Field Reinforcement LearningProceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/3635637.3662952(973-982)Online publication date: 6-May-2024
            • (2024)Surge Routing: Event-informed Multiagent Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous RideshareProceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/3635637.3662916(641-650)Online publication date: 6-May-2024
            • (2024)Heatmap-Based Decision Support for Repositioning in Ride-Sharing SystemsTransportation Science10.1287/trsc.2023.120258:1(110-130)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
            • (2024)Modeling, Analysis, and Control of Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Systems: A Discrete-Time Linear Dynamical System and a Model Predictive Control ApproachIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems10.1109/TITS.2024.339856225:8(8615-8628)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2024
            • (2024)A Clustering-Based Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Framework for Finer-Grained Taxi DispatchingIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems10.1109/TITS.2024.337082025:9(11269-11281)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2024
            • (2024)Promoting Collaborative Dispatching in the Ride-Sourcing Market With a Third-Party IntegratorIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems10.1109/TITS.2023.334876425:7(6889-6901)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
            • (2024)Spatiotemporal Pricing and Fleet Management of Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Networks: A Decomposition and Dynamic Programming Approach With Bounded Optimality GapIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems10.1109/TITS.2023.334025325:7(7057-7069)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
            • (2024)An Agent-Based Simulation Approach for Urban Road Pricing Considering the Integration of Autonomous Vehicles With Public TransportIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems10.1109/TITS.2023.331533825:2(1364-1373)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2024
            • (2024)A Reinforcement Learning and Prediction-Based Lookahead Policy for Vehicle Repositioning in Online Ride-Hailing SystemsIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems10.1109/TITS.2023.331204825:2(1846-1856)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2024
            • Show More Cited By

            View Options

            View options

            Figures

            Tables

            Media

            Share

            Share

            Share this Publication link

            Share on social media