Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

A Novel Sentiment Analysis Model of Museum User Experience Evaluation Data Based on Unbalanced Data Analysis Technology

Published: 01 January 2022 Publication History

Abstract

With the development of virtual reality and digital reconstruction technology, digital museums have been widely promoted in various cities. Digital museums offer new ways to display and disseminate cultural heritage. It allows remote users to autonomously browse displays in a physical museum environment in a digital space. It is also possible to reproduce the lost heritage through digital reconstruction and restoration, so as to digitally present tangible cultural heritage and intangible cultural heritage to the public. However, the user’s experience of using digital museums has not been fully and deeply studied at present. In this study, the user’s experience evaluation data of digital museum are classified and processed, so as to analyze the user’s emotional trend towards the museum. Considering that the user’s evaluation data are unbalanced data, this study uses an unbalanced support vector machine (USVM) in the classification of user evaluation data. The main idea of this method is that the boundary of the support vector is continuously shifted to the majority class by repeatedly oversampling some support vectors until the real support vector samples are found. The experimental results show that the classification obtained by the used USVM has a good practical reference value. Based on the classification results of the evaluation data, the construction of the digital museum can be further guided and maintained, thereby improving the user experience satisfaction of the museum. This research will make an important contribution to the construction of the museum and the inheritance of culture.

References

[1]
V. B. Naya and L. A. H. Ibanez, “Evaluating user experience in joint activities between schools and museums in virtual worlds,” Universal Access in the Information Society, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1–10, 2014.
[2]
D. I. Ko, Y. Sumi, and Y. Choi, “Personalized virtual exhibition tour (PVET): an experiment for Internet collaboration,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Tokyo, Japan, October 1999.
[3]
A. Pagano, G. Armone, and E. D. Sanctis, “Virtual museums and audience studies: the case of“Keys to Rome exhibition,” in Proceedings of the Digital Heritage International Congress, Granada, SPAIN, November 2016.
[4]
M. Moussaïd, V. R. Schinazi, M. Kapadia, and T. Thrash, “Virtual sensing and virtual reality: how new technologies can boost research on crowd dynamics,” Frontiers in Robotics and Ai, vol. 5, p. 82, 2018.
[5]
S. Yu Song and S. Shouqian Sun, “Research on virtual exhibition interaction and user experience technology,” in Proceedings of the 2008 9th International Conference on Computer-aided Industrial Design & Conceptual Design, Beijing, China, November 2008.
[6]
W. Ma, Y. Wang, Y. Q. Xu, Q. Li, X. Ma, and W. Gao, “Annotating traditional Chinese paintings for immersive virtual exhibition,” Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2012.
[7]
M. Lindvall, D. Ganesan, and R. Ardal, “Metamorphic model based testing applied on NASA DAT -an experience report,” International Conference on Software Engineering, vol. 129, 2015.
[8]
S. Rubio, E. Diaz, J. Martin, and J. M. Puente, “Evaluation of subjective mental workload: a comparison of SWAT, NASA-TLX, and workload profile methods,” Applied Psychology, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 61–86, 2004.
[9]
Q. Li, D. Xiong, and M. Shang, “Adjusted stochastic gradient descent for latent factor analysis,” Information Sciences, vol. 588, pp. 196–213, 2022.
[10]
R. Pervez, “Shakespeare and principal components analysis,” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1030–1041, 2021.
[11]
S. Keishi and H. Hideitsu, “Modal principal component analysis,” Neural Computation, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1901–1935, 2020.
[12]
A. Bafahm and M. Sun, “Some conflicting results in the analytic Hierarchy process,” International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 465–486, 2019.
[13]
E. L. C. Law and P. V. Schaik, “Modelling user experience - an agenda for research and practice,” Interacting with Computers, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 313–322, 2010.
[14]
H. L. O’Brien and E. G. Toms, “The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement,” Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 50–69, 2014.
[15]
J. Park, S. H. Han, H. K. Kim, S. Oh, and H. Moon, “Modeling user experience: a case study on a mobile device,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 187–196, 2013.
[16]
X. Chen, R. Huang, X. Li, L. Xiao, M. Zhou, and L. Zhang, “A novel user emotional interaction design model using long and short-term memory networks and deep learning,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1664–1078, 2021.
[17]
X. Chen, M. Cao, H. Wei, Z. Shang, and L. Zhang, “Patient emotion recognition in human computer interaction system based on machine learning method and interactive design theory,” Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 307–312, 2021.
[18]
X. Chen, “Lijun Xu,etc.Emotion interaction recognition based on deep adversarial network in interactive design for intelligent robot,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. P166860–P166868, 2019.
[19]
K. Priyadharshini Manisha and B. Sathya Bama, “Hyper-spectral image classification with support vector machine,” Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol. 700, pp. 587–593, 2021.
[20]
J. Li, S. Lin, K. Yu, and G. Guo, “Quantum K-nearest neighbor classification algorithm based on Hamming distance,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2022.
[21]
F. Abramovich, V. Grinshtein, and T. Levy, “Multiclass classification by sparse multinomial logistic regression,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 4637–4646, 2021.
[22]
G. R. Kumar, K. V. Sheshanna, S. R. Basha, and P. K. K. Reddy, “An improved decision tree classification approach for expectation of cardiotocogram,” Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol. 62, pp. 327–333, 2021.
[23]
A. Sharma and K. Tripathi, “Hybrid version of apriori using mapreduce,” Mobile Radio Communications and 5G Networks, vol. 140, pp. 585–592, 2021.
[24]
K. S. Pradeep, O. Esam, A. Rafeeq, M. Awais, D. Habib, and C. Prasenjit, “Optimized recommendations by user profiling using apriori algorithm,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 106, 2021.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience  Volume 2022, Issue
2022
32389 pages
ISSN:1687-5265
EISSN:1687-5273
Issue’s Table of Contents
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

London, United Kingdom

Publication History

Published: 01 January 2022

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 26 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media