Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
article
Free access

The role of verbal and nonverbal communication in a two-person, cooperative manipulation task

Published: 01 January 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Motivated by the differences between human and robot teams, we investigated the role of verbal communication between human teammates as they work together to move a large object to a series of target locations. Only one member of the group was told the target sequence by the experimenters, while the second teammate had no target knowledge. The two experimental conditions we compared were haptic-verbal (teammates are allowed to talk) and haptic only (no talking allowed). The team's trajectory was recorded and evaluated. In addition, participants completed a NASA TLX-style postexperimental survey which gauges workload along 6 different dimensions. In our initial experiment we found no significant difference in performance when verbal communication was added. In a follow-up experiment, using a different manipulation task, we did find that the addition of verbal communication significantly improved performance and reduced the perceived workload. In both experiments, for the haptic-only condition, we found that a remarkable number of groups independently improvised common haptic communication protocols (CHIPs). We speculate that such protocols can be substituted for verbal communication and that the performance difference between verbal and nonverbal communication may be related to how easy it is to distinguish the CHIPs from motions required for task completion.

References

[1]
J. Y. S. Luh and Y. F. Zheng, "Constrained relations between two coordinated industrial robots for motion control," International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 60-70, 1987.
[2]
Y. Kume, Y. Hirata, Z.-D. Wang, and K. Kosuge, "Decentralized control of multiple mobile manipulators handling a single object in coordination," in Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, vol. 3, pp. 2758-2763, October 2002.
[3]
V. Hayward, O. R. Astley, M. Cruz-Hernandez, D. Grant, and G. Robles-De-La-Torre, "Haptic interfaces and devices," Sensor Review, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 16-29, 2004.
[4]
A. M. Okamura, C. Richard, and M. R. Cutkosky, "Feeling is believing: using a force-feedback joystick to teach dynamic systems," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 345-349, 2002.
[5]
C. Schäfer and R. Dillmann, "Haptic display for human interaction with virtual dynamic environments," Journal of Robotic Systems, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 769-783, 2001.
[6]
T. G. Sugar and V. Kumar, "Control of cooperating mobile manipulators," IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 94-103, 2002.
[7]
J. Moll and E. L. Sallnas, "Communicative functions of haptic feedback," in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Haptic and Audio Interaction Design, pp. 1-10, Dresden, Germany, September 2009.
[8]
E. L. Sallnas, K. Rassmus-Grohn, and D. C. Sjostrom, "Supporting presence in collaborative environments by haptic force feedback," ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 461-476, 2000.
[9]
E. L. Sallnas, "Improved precision in mediated collaborative manipulation of objects by haptic force feedback," Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Haptic Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 69-75, 2001.
[10]
S. J. Glynn, R. Fekieta, and R. A. Henning, "Use of force-feedback joysticks to promote teamwork in virtual teleoperation," in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting, pp. 1911-1915, October 2001.
[11]
R. Groten, D. Feth, R. L. Klatzky, and A. Peer, "The role of haptic feedback for the integration of intentions in shared task execution," IEEE Transactions on Haptics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 94-105, 2013.
[12]
K. Reed, "Cooperative physical human-human and human-robot interaction," in Immersive Multimodal Interactive Presence, A. Peer and C. Giachritsis, Eds., Springer Series on Touch and Haptic Systems, pp. 105-127, Springer, 2012.
[13]
R. Ikeura and H. Inooka, "Cooperative force control in carrying an object by two humans," in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp. 2307-2311, October 1995.
[14]
C. Bubb-Lewis and M. W. Scerbo, "The effects of communication modes on performance and discourse organization with an adaptive interface," Applied Ergonomics, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 15-26, 2002.
[15]
L. Le Bigot, J. Rouet, and E. Jamet, "Effects of speech-and text-based interaction modes in natural language human-computer dialogue," Human Factors, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1045-1053, 2007.
[16]
E. L. Sallnas and S. Zhai, "Collaboration meets fitts law: passing virtual objects with and without haptic force feedback," in Proceedings of IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT '03), pp. 97-104, 2003.
[17]
R. Groten, J. Hölldampf, A. Peer, and M. Buss, "Predictability of a human partner in a pursuit tracking task without haptic feedback," in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conferences on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions (ACHI '09), pp. 63-68, Cancún, Mexico, February 2009.
[18]
C. Basdogan, C. H. Ho, and M. A. Srinivasan, "An experimental study on the role of touch in shared virtual environments," ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 443-460, 2000.
[19]
K. B. Reed and M. A. Peshkin, "Physical collaboration of human-human and human-robot teams," IEEE Transactions on Haptics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 108-120, 2008.
[20]
S. Gentry, E. Feron, and R. Murray-Smith, "Human-human haptic collaboration in cyclical Fitts' tasks," in Proceedings of the IEEE IRS/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 3402-3407, August 2005.
[21]
M. M. Rahman, R. Ikeura, and K. Mizutani, "Control characteristics of two humans in cooperative task and its application to robot control," in Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the IEEE Electronics Society (IECON '00), pp. 1773-1778, Nagoya, Japan, October 2000.
[22]
Y. Y. Huang, J. Moll, E. Sallnäs, and Y. Sundblad, "Auditory feedback in haptic collaborative interfaces," International Journal of Human Computer Studies, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 257-270, 2012.
[23]
D. A. Kenny, C. D. Mohr, and M. J. Levesque, "A social relations variance partitioning of dyadic behavior," Psychological Bulletin, vol. 127, no. 1, pp. 128-141, 2001.
[24]
R. Groten, D. Feth, H. Goshy, A. Peer, D. A. Kenny, and M. Buss, "Experimental analysis of dominance in haptic collaboration," in Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN'09), pp. 723-729, Toyama, Japan, October 2009.
[25]
S. S. Nudehi, R. Mukherjee, and M. Ghodoussi, "A shared-control approach to haptic interface design for minimally invasive telesurgical training," IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 588-592, 2005.
[26]
B. Khademian and K. Hashtrudi-Zaad, "Performance issues in collaborative haptic training," in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA'07), pp. 3257-3262, Roma, Italy, April 2007.
[27]
K. Kosuge, H. Yoshida, and T. Fukuda, "Dynamic control for robot-human collaboration," in Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication, pp. 398-401, 1993.
[28]
R. Ikeura and H. Inooka, "Variable impedance control of a robot for cooperation with a human," in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 3097-3102, May 1995.
[29]
H. Arai, T. Takubo, Y. Hayashibara, and K. Tanie, "Human-robot cooperative manipulation using a virtual nonholonomic constraint," in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA '00), pp. 4063-4069, April 2000.
[30]
S. Abu Bakar, R. Ikeura, Y. Handa, T. Yano, K. Mizutani, and H. Sawai, "Communication during the cooperative motion in the task of carrying an object between two humans," Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 104-118, 2010.
[31]
S. G. Hart and L. E. Staveland, "Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research," Advances in Psychology, vol. 52, pp. 139-183, 1988.
[32]
K. Ogata, Modern Control Engineering, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 3rd edition, 1997.

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)An environment for motor skill transfer based on wearable haptic communicationPersonal and Ubiquitous Computing10.1007/s00779-020-01425-z25:2(411-435)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2020
  • (2018)Planning with Verbal Communication for Human-Robot CollaborationACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/32033057:3(1-21)Online publication date: 16-Nov-2018
  1. The role of verbal and nonverbal communication in a two-person, cooperative manipulation task

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
    Advances in Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 2014, Issue
    January 2014
    212 pages
    ISSN:1687-5893
    EISSN:1687-5907
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Publisher

    Hindawi Limited

    London, United Kingdom

    Publication History

    Accepted: 22 May 2014
    Revised: 22 May 2014
    Published: 01 January 2014
    Received: 30 December 2013

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)19
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
    Reflects downloads up to 25 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2020)An environment for motor skill transfer based on wearable haptic communicationPersonal and Ubiquitous Computing10.1007/s00779-020-01425-z25:2(411-435)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2020
    • (2018)Planning with Verbal Communication for Human-Robot CollaborationACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/32033057:3(1-21)Online publication date: 16-Nov-2018

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media