Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
article
Free access

Reading and writing with computers: a framework for explaining differences in performance

Published: 01 September 1988 Publication History

Abstract

Several factors can influence the behavior of users as they read and write with computers. Recent research indicates that both quality and quantity depend upon page size, legibility, responsiveness and tangibility.

References

[1]
Bond, S.J. Protocol-aided revision: a tool for making documents usable. In Proceedings of the 1985 IBM ACIS Univ. AEP Conference (Alexandria, VA, June 23-26) pp. 327-334.
[2]
Booth, K.S., Bryden, M.P., Cowan, W.B., Morgan, M.F., Plante, B.L. On the parameters of human visual performance: An investigation of the benefits of anti-aliasing. In Proceedings of CHI + GI 1987 (Toronto, April 5-9). ACM, New York, 1987, pp. 13-20.
[3]
Gould, J. Composing letters with computer-based text editors. Human Factors 23, 5, 1981, 593-606.
[4]
Gould, J.D., Alfaro, L., Finn, R., Haupt, B., Minuto, A., Salaum, J. Why reading was slower from CRT displays than from paper. In Proceedings of CHI + GI 1987 (Toronto, April 5-9}. ACM, New York, 1987, pp. 7-12.
[5]
Gould, J., and Grischkowsky, N. Doing the same work with hardcopy and with CRT terminals. Human Factors 26, 3, 1984, 323-337.
[6]
Haas, C. How the Writing Medium Shapes the Writing Process: Studies of Writers Composing with Pen and Paper and with Word Processing. Doctoral dissertation, Carnegie-Mellon University, 1987.
[7]
Haas, C., and Hayes, J. Effects of text display variables on reading tasks: computer screen vs. hard copy. Communications Design Center, Technical Report #3, Pittsburgh: Carnegie-Mellon University, 1985a.
[8]
Haas, C., and Hayes, J. Reading on the computer: a comparison of standard and advanced computer display and hard copy. Communications Design Center, Technical Report #3, Pittsburgh: Carnegie- Mellon University, 1985b.
[9]
Haas, C., and Hayes, J. What did I just say? Reading problems in writing with the machine. Research in the Teaching of English 20, 1 February, 1986a.
[10]
Haas, C., and Hayes, J. Pen and paper vs the machine: Writers composing in hard copy and computer conditions. Communications Design Center, Technical Report #16, Pittsburgh: Carnegie-Mellon University, 1986b.
[11]
Hansen, W.J. User engineering principles for interactive systems, Fall Joint Computer Conference, AFIPS Press (Mondale, NJ, 1971), 523-532.
[12]
Hansen, W.J., Doring, R., and Whitlock, L.R. Why an examination was slower on-line than on paper. Int. J. of Man-Machine Studies 10, 5 1978, 507-519.
[13]
Hawisher, G. Computers and composition: A critical review. In Coming of Age: Computers in the Composition Classroom. Hawisher, G. and Selfe, C. (Eds.), Teachers' College Press, 1987.
[14]
Mantei, M. Disorientation Behavior in Person-Computer Interaction. Doctoral Dissertation, Computer Science Dept., Univ. of Southern Calif. University Microfilms, 1982.
[15]
Morris, J., Satyarayanan, M., Conner, M.H., Howard, J.H., Rosenthal, D.S.H., Smith, F.D. Andrew: A distributed Personal Computing Environment. Commun. ACM 29, 3 (March 1986) 184-201.
[16]
Muter, P., Latremouille, S.A., Treuniet, W.C., and Beam, P. Extended reading of continuous text on television screens. Human Factors 24, 5 (1982), 501-508.
[17]
National Science Foundation, EXPerimental Research in Electronic Submission. Request for Proposal, 1986.
[18]
RothkopL E.Z. Incidental memory for location of information in text. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 10, 6 1971, 608-613.
[19]
Shneiderman, B. Direct manipulation: A step beyond programming languages. IEEE Computer 16, 8 (Aug. 1983}, 57-69.
[20]
Stallman, R.M. EMACS: The Extensible, Customizable Self-Documenting Display Editor. ACM SIGPLAN/SIGOA Symposium on Text Manipulation, 1981.
[21]
Turkle, S. Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit. Simon and Schuster, New York, 1984.
[22]
Wright, P., and Lickorish, A. Proof-reading texts on screen and paper. Behavior and Inf. Tech. 2, 3 (1983), 227-235.
[23]
Wylie, J. Personal Editor. Program 6936760, Personal Computer Professional Series, IBM Corporation, 1982.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Reviews

James Clinton Spohrer

Understanding the factors that influence human performance in writing and reading tasks becomes increasingly important as we spend more and more of our time writing and reading with computer screens instead of with paper. The authors present a list of seven factors that they use to explain performance differences when people write and read with paper, personal computers, and workstations. They identify four primary factors—page size, legibility, responsiveness, and tangibility—and three secondary factors—sense of text, sense of direction, and sense of engagement. These seven factors can be varied to influence the quality and speed of reading and writing performance. The authors explain the results of four experimental tasks—spatial recall, retrieval, reordering lines, and writing letters—in terms of their seven factors. All experiments showed that for reading tasks, paper was superior, followed by workstations and finally by personal computers. For writing tasks, working on paper produced the highest quality letters, while those letters composed on workstations were longer. The authors have used the results of these experiments to improve the user interface of their computer-based system for reading and writing documents. This paper will interest both researchers studying human-computer interface issues and designers of computer-based systems for reading and writing documents. It is quite concise but still manages to relate the authors' research to other work in the field. The framework that the authors present also serves as a useful introduction to the factors that influence the behavior of those who write and read with computers.

Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 September 1988
Published in CACM Volume 31, Issue 9

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)84
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12
Reflects downloads up to 22 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Is typewriting more resources-demanding than handwriting in undergraduate students?Reading and Writing10.1007/s11145-021-10137-6Online publication date: 4-Apr-2021
  • (2018)Digital reading habits of pre-service Turkish language teachersSouth African Journal of Education10.15700/saje.v38ns2a164138:Supplement 2(1-12)Online publication date: 31-Dec-2018
  • (2018)Searching Versus Browsing in HypertextHypermedia10.1080/09558543.1992.120312004:1(1-30)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2018
  • (2018)Designing to Facilitate Browsing: A Look Back at the Hyperties Workstation BrowserHypermedia10.1080/09558543.1991.120311933:2(101-117)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2018
  • (2018)Collaborative Writing of Text and HypertextHypermedia10.1080/09558543.1989.120311601:2(93-110)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2018
  • (2017)IllumiPaperProceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3025453.3025525(5605-5618)Online publication date: 2-May-2017
  • (2017)Cognitive map or medium materiality? Reading on paper and screenComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.01467:C(84-94)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2017
  • (2016)The Effects of Using a Hypertext Tool for Selecting Design GuidelinesProceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting10.1177/15419312920360043536:4(428-432)Online publication date: 5-Nov-2016
  • (2016)Investigating Text Legibility on Non-Rectangular DisplaysProceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2858036.2858057(498-508)Online publication date: 7-May-2016
  • (2014)Comparison of paper and computer displays in reading including frequent movement between pagesProceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: the Future of Design10.1145/2686612.2686700(549-558)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2014
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media