Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3278721.3278734acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaiesConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Socialbots Supporting Human Rights

Published: 27 December 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Socialbots, or non-human/algorithmic social media users, have recently been documented as competing for information dissemination and disruption on online social networks. Here we investigate the influence of socialbots in Mexican Twitter in regards to the "Tanhuato" human rights abuse report. We analyze the applicability of the BotOrNot API to generalize from English to Spanish tweets and propose adaptations for Spanish-speaking bot detection. We then use text and sentiment analysis to compare the differences between bot and human tweets. Our analysis shows that bots actually aided in information proliferation among human users. This suggests that taxonomies classifying bots should include non-adversarial roles as well. Our study contributes to the understanding of different behaviors and intentions of automated accounts observed in empirical online social network data. Since this type of analysis is seldom performed in languages different from English, the proposed techniques we employ here are also useful for other non-English corpora.

References

[1]
Alex Beutel, Wanhong Xu, Venkatesan Guruswami, Christopher Palow, and Christos Faloutsos. 2013. CopyCatch: Stopping Group Attacks by Spotting Lockstep Behavior in Social Networks. In Proceedings of the 22Nd International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 119--130.
[2]
Yazan Boshmaf, Ildar Muslukhov, Konstantin Beznosov, and Matei Ripeanu. 2013. Design and Analysis of a Social Botnet. Comput. Netw., Vol. 57, 2 (Feb. 2013), 556--578.
[3]
Lars Buitinck, Gilles Louppe, Mathieu Blondel, Fabian Pedregosa, Andreas Mueller, Olivier Grisel, Vlad Niculae, Peter Prettenhofer, Alexandre Gramfort, Jaques Grobler, Robert Layton, Jake VanderPlas, Arnaud Joly, Brian Holt, and Gaë l Varoquaux. 2013. API design for machine learning software: experiences from the scikit-learn project. In ECML PKDD Workshop: Languages for Data Mining and Machine Learning . 108--122.
[4]
Nikan Chavoshi, Hossein Hamooni, and Abdullah Mueen. 2016. Identifying Correlated Bots in Twitter. In International Conference on Social Informatics . Springer International Publishing, 14--21.
[5]
Zi Chu, Steven Gianvecchio, Haining Wang, and Sushil Jajodia. 2010. Who is Tweeting on Twitter: Human, Bot, or Cyborg?. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 21--30.
[6]
Eric M. Clark, Jake Ryland Williams, Chris A. Jones, Richard A. Galbraith, Christopher M. Danforth, and Peter Sheridan Dodds. 2016. Sifting robotic from organic text: A natural language approach for detecting automation on Twitter. Journal of Computational Science, Vol. 16 (2016), 1 -- 7.
[7]
Clayton Allen Davis, Onur Varol, Emilio Ferrara, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer. 2016. BotOrNot: A System to Evaluate Social Bots. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web (WWW '16 Companion). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, 273--274.
[8]
John P. Dickerson, Vadim Kagan, and V.S. Subrahmanian. 2014. Using sentiment to detect bots on Twitter: Are humans more opinionated than bots? 2014 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), Vol. 00, undefined (2014), 620--627.
[9]
Peter Sheridan Dodds, Kameron Decker Harris, Isabel M Kloumann, Catherine A Bliss, and Christopher M Danforth. 2011. Temporal patterns of happiness and information in a global social network: Hedonometrics and Twitter. PloS one, Vol. 6, 12 (2011), e26752.
[10]
Emilio Ferrara, Onur Varol, Clayton Davis, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. 2016. The Rise of Social Bots. Commun. ACM, Vol. 59, 7 (June 2016), 96--104.
[11]
Xia Hu, Jiliang Tang, Huiji Gao, and Huan Liu. 2014. Social Spammer Detection with Sentiment Information. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM '14). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 180--189.
[12]
Xia Hu, Jiliang Tang, Yanchao Zhang, and Huan Liu. 2013. Social Spammer Detection in Microblogging. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI '13). AAAI Press, 2633--2639.
[13]
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, and Margaret E. Roberts. 2013. How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression. American Political Science Review, Vol. 107, 2 (May) (2013), 1--18. Please see our followup article published in Science, textquotedblleftReverse-Engineering Censorship In China: Randomized Experimentation And Participant Observation.textquotedblright.
[14]
Kyumin Lee, Brian David Eoff, and James Caverlee. 2011. Seven months with the devils: a long-term study of content polluters on Twitter. In In AAAI Int'l Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM .
[15]
Sangho Lee and Jong Kim. 2014. Early Filtering of Ephemeral Malicious Accounts on Twitter. Comput. Commun., Vol. 54, C (Dec. 2014), 48--57.
[16]
Jacob Ratkiewicz, Michael Conover, Mark Meiss, Bruno Gonçalves, Snehal Patil, and Ro Flammini. 2011. Truthy: Mapping the Spread of Astroturf in Microblog Streams. In Proceedings of the 20th interna)onal conference companion on World wide web .
[17]
Saiph Savage, Andres Monroy-Hernandez, and Tobias Höllerer. 2016. Botivist: Calling Volunteers to Action Using Online Bots. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 813--822.
[18]
Daniel Sparks. 2017. How Many Users Does Twitter Have? https://www.fool.com/investing/2017/04/27/how-many-users-does-twitter-have.aspx {Online; accessed 06-June-2017}.
[19]
Kurt Thomas, Chris Grier, Dawn Song, and Vern Paxson. 2011. Suspended Accounts in Retrospect: An Analysis of Twitter Spam. In Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement Conference (IMC '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 243--258.
[20]
Kurt Thomas, Damon McCoy, Chris Grier, Alek Kolcz, and Vern Paxson. 2013. Trafficking Fraudulent Accounts: The Role of the Underground Market in Twitter Spam and Abuse. In Proceedings of the 22Nd USENIX Conference on Security (SEC'13). USENIX Association, Berkeley, CA, USA, 195--210.
[21]
Alex Hai Wang. 2010. Detecting Spam Bots in Online Social Networking Sites: A Machine Learning Approach .Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 335--342.
[22]
Samuel Woolley. 2016. Automating power: Social bot interference in global politics. First Monday, Vol. 21, 4 (2016).
[23]
Zhi Yang, Christo Wilson, Xiao Wang, Tingting Gao, Ben Y. Zhao, and Yafei Dai. 2011. Uncovering Social Network Sybils in the Wild. In Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement Conference (IMC '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 259--268.
[24]
Yin Zhu, Xiao Wang, Erheng Zhong, Nanthan N. Liu, He Li, and Qiang Yang. 2012. Discovering Spammers in Social Networks. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'12). AAAI Press, 171--177.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Modelo de influencia social en redes sociales para predecir la persuasión en la promoción y protección de derechos humanosSigno y Pensamiento10.11144/Javeriana.syp43.misr43Online publication date: 17-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Detection and impact estimation of social bots in the Chilean Twitter networkScientific Reports10.1038/s41598-024-57227-314:1Online publication date: 19-Mar-2024
  • (2021)Bots in Public Arenas of Social NetworksSociological Journal10.19181/socjour.2021.27.4.864727:4(99-117)Online publication date: 2021
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
AIES '18: Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society
December 2018
406 pages
ISBN:9781450360128
DOI:10.1145/3278721
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 December 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. human rights
  2. mexico
  3. social network analysis
  4. socialbots
  5. spanish

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

AIES '18
Sponsor:
AIES '18: AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society
February 2 - 3, 2018
LA, New Orleans, USA

Acceptance Rates

AIES '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 61 of 162 submissions, 38%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 61 of 162 submissions, 38%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 27 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Modelo de influencia social en redes sociales para predecir la persuasión en la promoción y protección de derechos humanosSigno y Pensamiento10.11144/Javeriana.syp43.misr43Online publication date: 17-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Detection and impact estimation of social bots in the Chilean Twitter networkScientific Reports10.1038/s41598-024-57227-314:1Online publication date: 19-Mar-2024
  • (2021)Bots in Public Arenas of Social NetworksSociological Journal10.19181/socjour.2021.27.4.864727:4(99-117)Online publication date: 2021
  • (2021)Misleading information in Spanish: a surveySocial Network Analysis and Mining10.1007/s13278-021-00746-y11:1Online publication date: 9-Apr-2021
  • (2020)A Framework for Detecting Intentions of Criminal Acts in Social Media: A Case Study on TwitterInformation10.3390/info1103015411:3(154)Online publication date: 12-Mar-2020
  • (2019)BoostNet: Bootstrapping Detection of Socialbots, and a Case Study from GuatemalaSelected Contributions on Statistics and Data Science in Latin America10.1007/978-3-030-31551-1_11(145-154)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2019
  • (2018)Socialbots Whitewashing Contested Elections; A Case Study from HondurasThird International Congress on Information and Communication Technology10.1007/978-981-13-1165-9_50(547-552)Online publication date: 29-Sep-2018

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media