Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3098822.3098823acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

dRMT: Disaggregated Programmable Switching

Published: 07 August 2017 Publication History

Abstract

We present dRMT (disaggregated Reconfigurable Match-Action Table), a new architecture for programmable switches. dRMT overcomes two important restrictions of RMT, the predominant pipeline-based architecture for programmable switches: (1) table memory is local to an RMT pipeline stage, implying that memory not used by one stage cannot be reclaimed by another, and (2) RMT is hardwired to always sequentially execute matches followed by actions as packets traverse pipeline stages. We show that these restrictions make it difficult to execute programs efficiently on RMT.
dRMT resolves both issues by disaggregating the memory and compute resources of a programmable switch. Specifically, dRMT moves table memories out of pipeline stages and into a centralized pool that is accessible through a crossbar. In addition, dRMT replaces RMT's pipeline stages with a cluster of processors that can execute match and action operations in any order.
We show how to schedule a P4 program on dRMT at compile time to guarantee deterministic throughput and latency. We also present a hardware design for dRMT and analyze its feasibility and chip area. Our results show that dRMT can run programs at line rate with fewer processors compared to RMT, and avoids performance cliffs when there are not enough processors to run a program at line rate. dRMT's hardware design incurs a modest increase in chip area relative to RMT, mainly due to the crossbar.

Supplementary Material

WEBM File (drmtdisaggregatedprogrammableswitching.webm)

References

[1]
A Deeper Dive Into Barefoot Networks Technology. http://techfieldday.com/appearance/barefoot-networks-presents-at-networking-field-day-14.
[2]
Barefoot: The World's Fastest and Most Programmable Networks. https://barefootnetworks.com/media/white_papers/Barefoot-Worlds-Fastest-Most-Programmable-Networks.pdf.
[3]
Cavium Attacks Broadcom in Switches. http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1323931.
[4]
Cisco QuantumFlow Processor. https://newsroom.cisco.com/feature-content?type=webcontent&articleId=4237516.
[5]
dRMT project. http://drmt.technion.ac.il.
[6]
Gurobi Optimization. http://www.gurobi.com.
[7]
Intel FlexPipe. http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/product-briefs/ethernet-switch-fm6000-series-brief.pdf.
[8]
Intel IXP2800 Network Processor. http://www.ic72.com/pdf_file/i/587106.pdf.
[9]
IXP4XX Product Line of Network Processors. http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/intelligent-systems/previous-generation/intel-ixp4xx-intel-network-processor-product-line.html.
[10]
Mellanox Indigo NPS-400 400Gbps NPU. http://www.mellanox.com/page/products_dyn?product_family=241&mtag=nps_400.
[11]
Netronome Agilio CX SmartNICs. https://www.netronome.com/products/agilio-cx.
[12]
P4 Specification. https://p4lang.github.io/p4-spec.
[13]
switch.p4. https://github.com/p4lang/switch/tree/master/p4src.
[14]
XPliant™ Ethernet Switch Product Family. http://www.cavium.com/XPliant-Ethernet-Switch-Product-Family.html.
[15]
P. Bosshart, D. Daly, G. Gibb, M. Izzard, N. McKeown, J. Rexford, C. Schlesinger, D. Talayco, A. Vahdat, G. Varghese, and D. Walker. P4: Programming Protocol-Independent Packet Processors. SIGCOMM CCR, July 2014.
[16]
P. Bosshart, G. Gibb, H.-S. Kim, G. Varghese, N. McKeown, M. Izzard, F. Mujica, and M. Horowitz. Forwarding Metamorphosis: Fast Programmable Match-Action Processing in Hardware for SDN. In ACM SIGCOMM, 2013.
[17]
M. Dobrescu, N. Egi, K. Argyraki, B.-G. Chun, K. Fall, G. Iannaccone, A. Knies, M. Manesh, and S. Ratnasamy. RouteBricks: Exploiting Parallelism to Scale Software Routers. ACM SOSP, 2009.
[18]
D. L. Draper, A. K. Jonsson, D. P. Clements, and D. E. Joslin. Cyclic scheduling. In IJCAI, 1999.
[19]
G. Gibb, G. Varghese, M. Horowitz, and N. McKeown. Design Principles for Packet Parsers. In ANCS, 2013.
[20]
C. Hanen. Study of a NP-hard cyclic scheduling problem: The recurrent job-shop. European journal of operational research, 1994.
[21]
C. Hanen and A. Munier. A study of the cyclic scheduling problem on parallel processors. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 1995.
[22]
L. Jose, L. Yan, G. Varghese, and N. McKeown. Compiling Packet Programs to Reconfigurable Switches. In NSDI, 2015.
[23]
I. Keslassy, K. Kogan, G. Scalosub, and M. Segal. Providing performance guarantees in multipass network processors. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 20(6):1895--1909, 2012.
[24]
D. A. Patterson and J. L. Hennessy. Computer Organization and Design, 4th Edition: The Hardware/Software Interface. 2008.
[25]
T. Sherwood, G. Varghese, and B. Calder. A pipelined memory architecture for high throughput network processors. In ISCA, 2003.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)High-Performance Reconfigurable Pipeline Implementation for FPGA-Based SmartNICMicromachines10.3390/mi1504044915:4(449)Online publication date: 27-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Rethinking the Switch Architecture for Stateful In-network ComputingProceedings of the 23rd ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks10.1145/3696348.3696897(273-281)Online publication date: 18-Nov-2024
  • (2024)iGuard: Efficient Isolation Forest Design for Malicious Traffic Detection in Programmable SwitchesProceedings of the 20th International Conference on emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies10.1145/3680121.3697807(55-64)Online publication date: 9-Dec-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGCOMM '17: Proceedings of the Conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
August 2017
515 pages
ISBN:9781450346535
DOI:10.1145/3098822
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 August 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Programmable switching
  2. RMT
  3. disagreggation
  4. packet processing

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

SIGCOMM '17
Sponsor:
SIGCOMM '17: ACM SIGCOMM 2017 Conference
August 21 - 25, 2017
CA, Los Angeles, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 462 of 3,389 submissions, 14%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)405
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)45
Reflects downloads up to 26 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)High-Performance Reconfigurable Pipeline Implementation for FPGA-Based SmartNICMicromachines10.3390/mi1504044915:4(449)Online publication date: 27-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Rethinking the Switch Architecture for Stateful In-network ComputingProceedings of the 23rd ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks10.1145/3696348.3696897(273-281)Online publication date: 18-Nov-2024
  • (2024)iGuard: Efficient Isolation Forest Design for Malicious Traffic Detection in Programmable SwitchesProceedings of the 20th International Conference on emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies10.1145/3680121.3697807(55-64)Online publication date: 9-Dec-2024
  • (2024)P4runpro: Enabling Runtime Programmability for RMT Programmable SwitchesProceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2024 Conference10.1145/3651890.3672230(921-937)Online publication date: 4-Aug-2024
  • (2024)OptimusPrime: Unleash Dataplane Programmability through a Transformable ArchitectureProceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2024 Conference10.1145/3651890.3672214(904-920)Online publication date: 4-Aug-2024
  • (2024)An Implementation of Reconfigurable Match Table for FPGA-Based Programmable SwitchesIEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems10.1109/TVLSI.2024.343604732:11(2121-2134)Online publication date: Nov-2024
  • (2024)Charting the Complexity Landscape of Compiling Packet Programs to Reconfigurable SwitchesIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2024.342433732:5(4519-4534)Online publication date: Oct-2024
  • (2024)Resource-Efficient and Timely Packet Header Vector (PHV) Encoding on Programmable SwitchesIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2024.341353032:5(4191-4206)Online publication date: Oct-2024
  • (2024)Hermes: Low-Overhead Inter-Switch Coordination in Network-Wide Data Plane Program DeploymentIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2024.336132432:4(2842-2857)Online publication date: Aug-2024
  • (2024)Towards Accelerating the Network Performance on DPUs by optimising the P4 runtime2024 32nd Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Network-Based Processing (PDP)10.1109/PDP62718.2024.00040(238-244)Online publication date: 20-Mar-2024
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media