Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3614321.3614358acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Assessing e-Participation indices: A Call for More Valid Measurement

Published: 20 November 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Digital political participation is seen as an important milestone towards more equitable and sustainable development. It is connected to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), specifically SDG 16 on Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions, which is one of the three cross-cutting objectives. Thus, it is essential to establish a dependable and valid way to measure this global trend. We argue that current measures of digital political participation, such as the United Nations’ E-Participation Index (EPI) or the Balanced-EPI (BEPI), fail to capture the full extent of digital political participation. They are skewed toward e-services, which discounts digital political participation. Additionally, most indices are unable to track developments over time. To tackle these issues, this paper proposes the implementation of DigiPartIndex (DPI) at the national level. The initial focus is on democratic countries that exhibit high levels of digital political participation. The DPI is a composite index based on the subnational DPI used in Switzerland. Adjustments have been made to make the index relevant and robust for national-level analysis. The national DPI-score ranges from 0 to 100 points. We have identified significant differences among the countries studied. Moreover, the measures presently in place appear to capture a reduced variance of digital political participation in the scrutinized countries. Further scrutiny reveals that the existing indices capture only specific aspects of digital participation, i.e. opinion-formation and information gathering, while failing to account for the participatory aspects central to the concept.

Supplemental Material

PDF File
Review table with our reactions to reviews.

References

[1]
Robert Adcock and David Collier. 2001. Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research. American Political Science Review 95, 3 (Sept. 2001), 529–546. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055401003100
[2]
Miguel Arana-Catania, Felix-Anselm Van Lier, Rob Procter, Nataliya Tkachenko, Yulan He, Arkaitz Zubiaga, and Maria Liakata. 2021. Citizen Participation and Machine Learning for a Better Democracy. Digit. Gov.: Res. Pract. 2, 3, Article 27 (jul 2021), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3452118
[3]
Cem Dener, Hubert Nii-Aponsah, Love E. Ghunney, and Kimberly D. Johns. 2021. GovTech Maturity Index: The State of Public Sector Digital Transformation. World Bank, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1765-6
[4]
Diego Garzia and Stefan Marschall. 2012. Voting Advice Applications under review: the state of research. International Journal of Electronic Governance 5, 3-4 (2012), 203–222.
[5]
Leonhard Hennen, Ira Van Keulen, Iris Korthagen, Georg Aichholzer, Ralf Lindner, and Rasmus Øjvind Nielsen. 2020. European e-democracy in practice. Springer, Cham.
[6]
Gabriel Hofmann, Uwe Serdült, Costa Vayenas, Marine Benli Trichet, Jean-Patrick Villeneuve, Anna Picco Schwendner, and Leonardo Colosante. 2022. DigiPartIndex Schweiz 2022. DigiPartIndex, Aarau, Zürich, Lugano. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-209314
[7]
David Le Blanc. 2020. E-Participation: A Quick Overview of Recent Qualitative Trends.
[8]
Catharina Lindstedt and Daniel Naurin. 2010. Transparency Is Not Enough: Making Transparency Effective in Reducing Corruption. International Political Science Review 31, 3 (June 2010), 301–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512110377602
[9]
Rony Medaglia. 2012. eParticipation Research: Moving Characterization Forward (2006–2011). Government Information Quarterly 29, 3 (July 2012), 346–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.02.010
[10]
Giulia Mugellini, Jean-Patrick Villeneuve, and Marlen Heide. 2021. Monitoring Sustainable Development Goals and the Quest for High-Quality Indicators: Learning from a Practical Evaluation of Data on Corruption. Sustainable Development 29, 6 (2021), 1257–1275. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2223
[11]
OECD. 2001. Citizens as Partners: OECD Handbook on Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-Making. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264195578-en
[12]
Tiago Peixoto and Tom Steinberg. 2019. Citizen Engagement. (Oct. 2019). https://doi.org/10.1596/32495
[13]
Ali Pirannejad, Marijn Janssen, and Jafar Rezaei. 2019. Towards a Balanced E-Participation Index: Integrating Government and Society Perspectives. Government Information Quarterly 36, 4 (2019), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101404
[14]
Uwe Serdült, Gabriel Hofmann, Mate Kovacs, Konatsu Sugimoto, and Yuuka Watanabe. 2023. E-Participation Maturity Model Development based on the Cases of Germany, Japan and Switzerland. In EGOV-CeDEM-ePart, September 4–7, 2023, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3449/paper19.pdf
[15]
Uwe Serdült, Gabriel Hofmann, and Costa Vayenas. 2022. Introducing the DigiPart-Index: Mapping and Explaining Digital Political Participation on the Subnational Level in Switzerland. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance(ICEGOV ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1145/3560107.3560145
[16]
Adrian Smith and Pedro Prieto Martín. 2021. Going beyond the smart city? Implementing technopolitical platforms for urban democracy in Madrid and Barcelona. Journal of Urban Technology 28, 1-2 (2021), 311–330.
[17]
Department of Economic and Social Affairs UNDESA. 2022. United Nations E-Government Survey 2022: Digital Governance in the Decade of Action for Sustainable Development.
[18]
United Nations (Ed.). 2020. Digitial Government in the Decade of Action for Sustainable Development. Number 2020 in United Nations E-Government Survey. United Nations, New York.
[19]
Christine B. Williams, Girish J. "Jeff" Gulati, and David J. Yates. 2013. Predictors of On-Line Services and e-Participation: A Cross-National Comparison. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research(Dg.o ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 190–197. https://doi.org/10.1145/2479724.2479752

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)E-Participation Without Democracy: Understanding Variation in Digital Engagement in Non-democraciesElectronic Participation10.1007/978-3-031-70804-6_7(99-115)Online publication date: 3-Sep-2024

Index Terms

  1. Assessing e-Participation indices: A Call for More Valid Measurement
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          ICEGOV '23: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
          September 2023
          509 pages
          ISBN:9798400707421
          DOI:10.1145/3614321
          This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial International 4.0 License.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          Published: 20 November 2023

          Check for updates

          Author Tags

          1. digital participation
          2. e-ID
          3. e-collecting
          4. e-consultation
          5. e-deliberation
          6. e-governance
          7. index
          8. internet voting

          Qualifiers

          • Research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Funding Sources

          Conference

          ICEGOV 2023

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate 350 of 865 submissions, 40%

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)222
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)46
          Reflects downloads up to 20 Nov 2024

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          Cited By

          View all
          • (2024)E-Participation Without Democracy: Understanding Variation in Digital Engagement in Non-democraciesElectronic Participation10.1007/978-3-031-70804-6_7(99-115)Online publication date: 3-Sep-2024

          View Options

          View options

          PDF

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format.

          HTML Format

          Login options

          Media

          Figures

          Other

          Tables

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media