Cited By
View all- Cyrek B(2024)Potentials and pitfalls of using ChatGPT in journalismZarządzanie Mediami10.4467/23540214ZM.23.013.1974111:2(195-210)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2024
Transparency is Crucial for User-Centered AI, or is it? How this Notion Manifests in the UK Press Coverage of GPT
Article No.: 28, Pages 1 - 8
Abstract
Transparency is a core principle for a user-centered AI present in all recent regulatory initiatives. Is it equally present in the public discourse? In this study, we focus on a type of AI that reached the media, i.e., GPT. We collected a corpus of national newspaper articles published in the United Kingdom (UK) while GPT-3 was the latest version (June 2020-November 2022) and investigated whether transparency was mentioned and, if so, in which terms. We used a mixed quantitative and qualitative approach, through which articles are both parsed for word frequency and manually coded. The results show that transparency was rarely explicitly mentioned, but issues underpinning transparency were addresssed in most texts. As a follow-up of the initial study, the scant presence of the term transparency is confirmed in an additional corpus of UK national newspaper articles published since the launch of ChatGPT (November 2022 - May 2023). The implications of missing transparency as a reference for AI ethical concerns in the public discourse are discussed.
References
[1]
Gloria Andrada, Robert W. Clowes, and Paul R. Smart. 2022. Varieties of transparency: exploring agency within AI systems. AI & SOCIETY. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01326-6
[2]
Amanda Askell, Miles Brundage, and Gillian Hadfield. 2019. The Role of Cooperation in Responsible AI Development.
[3]
Susanne Barth, Dan Ionita, and Pieter Hartel. 2023. Understanding Online Privacy—A Systematic Review of Privacy Visualizations and Privacy by Design Guidelines. ACM Computing Surveys 55, 3: 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3502288
[4]
BritainThinks. 2022. AI Governance. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1146010/CDEI_AI_White_Paper_Final_report.pdf
[5]
Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Chris Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. 2020. Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 1877–1901. Retrieved from https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2020/file/1457c0d6bfcb4967418bfb8ac142f64a-Paper.pdf
[6]
Rudresh Dwivedi, Devam Dave, Het Naik, Smiti Singhal, Rana Omer, Pankesh Patel, Bin Qian, Zhenyu Wen, Tejal Shah, Graham Morgan, and Rajiv Ranjan. 2023. Explainable AI (XAI): Core Ideas, Techniques, and Solutions. ACM Computing Surveys 55, 9: 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1145/3561048
[7]
European Commission, Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology AI HLEG. 2020. On Artificial Intelligence - A European approach to excellence and trust. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0065
[8]
European Union. 2016. General Data Protection Regulation. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj/eng
[9]
European Union. 2022. Digital Services Act. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj
[10]
European Union. Artificial Intelligence Act (proposal). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52021PC0206
[11]
Heike Felzmann, Eduard Fosch-Villaronga, Christoph Lutz, and Aurelia Tamò-Larrieux. 2020. Towards Transparency by Design for Artificial Intelligence. Science and Engineering Ethics 26, 6: 3333–3361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00276-4
[12]
Margaret Hagan. 2020. Legal Design as a Thing: A Theory of Change and a Set of Methods to Craft a Human-Centered Legal System. Design Issues 36, 3: 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00600
[13]
High-Level Expert Group on AI. 2019. Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. European Commission. Retrieved from https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai
[14]
Davinder Kaur, Suleyman Uslu, Kaley J. Rittichier, and Arjan Durresi. 2023. Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: A Review. ACM Computing Surveys 55, 2: 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491209
[15]
Ida Koivisto. 2022. The Transparency Paradox. Oxford University Press.
[16]
Bo Li, Peng Qi, Bo Liu, Shuai Di, Jingen Liu, Jiquan Pei, Jinfeng Yi, and Bowen Zhou. 2023. Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices. ACM Computing Surveys 55, 9: 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555803
[17]
Dan Milmo. 2023. ChatGPT reaches 100 million users two months after launch. The Guardian. Retrieved April 8, 2023 from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/feb/02/chatgpt-100-million-users-open-ai-fastest-growing-app
[18]
Brent Mittelstadt. 2022. Interpretability and Transparency in Artificial Intelligence. In The Oxford Handbook of Digital Ethics (1st ed.), Carissa Véliz (ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198857815.013.20
[19]
Joel R Reidenberg, Travis Breaux, Lorrie Faith Cranor, Brian French, Amanda Grannis, James T Graves, Fei Liu, Aleecia McDonald, Thomas B Norton, and Rohan Ramanath. 2015. Disagreeable privacy policies: Mismatches between meaning and users’ understanding. Berkeley Tech. LJ 30: 39.
[20]
Rishi Bommasani, Kevin Klyma, Daniel Zhang, and Percy Liang. 2023. Do Foundation Model Providers Comply with the Draft EU AI Act? Retrieved from https://crfm.stanford.edu/2023/06/15/eu-ai-act.html
[21]
Stuart J. Russell. 2020. Human compatible: artificial intelligence and the problem of control. Penguin Books, New York.
[22]
John R Searle. 1980. Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and brain sciences 3, 3: 417–424.
[23]
Statista. 2023. Artificial Intelligence: in-depth market analysis. Market Insights report. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/study/50485/in-depth-report-artificial-intelligence/
[24]
Elham Tabassi. 2023. AI Risk Management Framework: AI RMF (1.0). National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1
[25]
The Ethics and Research Integrity Sector, DG R&I. 2021. Ethics By Design and Ethics of Use Approaches for Artificial Intelligence. European Commission. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwic66qRmp_-AhW9VPEDHbj5AycQFnoECAoQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fec.europa.eu%2Finfo%2Ffunding-tenders%2Fopportunities%2Fdocs%2F2021-2027%2Fhorizon%2Fguidance%2Fethics-by-design-and-ethics-of-use-approaches-for-artificial-intelligence_he_en.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0dEoBG6A2oAxXf4LQfXdQ6
[26]
USA. 2022. American Data Privacy and Protection Act (proposal). Retrieved from https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/8152/text
[27]
Joel Walmsley. 2021. Artificial intelligence and the value of transparency. AI & SOCIETY 36, 2: 585–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01066-z
[28]
Will Douglas Heaven. 2020. OpenAI's new language generator GPT-3 is shockingly good—and completely mindless. the MIT Technology Review. Retrieved from https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/07/20/1005454/openai-machine-learning-language-generator-gpt-3-nlp/
[29]
Terry Winograd, Fernando Flores, and Fernando F Flores. 1986. Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Intellect Books.
[30]
Shoshana Zuboff. 2019. The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Profile books.
[31]
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology. 2023. A pro-innovation approach to AI regulation, presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology by command of His Majesty. London, UK.
Index Terms
- Transparency is Crucial for User-Centered AI, or is it? How this Notion Manifests in the UK Press Coverage of GPT
Recommendations
Using internet to promote the transparency and fight corruption: Latin American transparency portals
ICEGOV '10: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic GovernanceThe right to social control of the government refers to the monitoring of the formulation of policies and initiatives of government by citizens and their social organizations. This category of rights creates conditions for the establishment of relations ...
Transparency in e-governance
ICEGOV '10: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic GovernanceWith widespread use and application of modern information and communications technologies (ICTs), especially computers and the internet, realization of government informational transparency through digital channels has been at the core of contemporary ...
Transparency and Accountability After 2015: e-Parliament for Citizens' Engagement in the Ghanaian Environment
ICEGOV '15-16: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic GovernanceBeyond providing information, Information and Communication Technology (ICT) really contributes to citizens' participation to public debate. With the use of ICT, Civil societies have played a big role especially in the areas of training, research, ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
September 2023
416 pages
ISBN:9798400708060
DOI:10.1145/3605390
Copyright © 2023 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 20 September 2023
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Short-paper
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
CHItaly 2023
CHItaly 2023: 15th Biannual Conference of the Italian SIGCHI Chapter
September 20 - 22, 2023
Torino, Italy
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 109 of 242 submissions, 45%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 390Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)331
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)51
Reflects downloads up to 26 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View all- Cyrek B(2024)Potentials and pitfalls of using ChatGPT in journalismZarządzanie Mediami10.4467/23540214ZM.23.013.1974111:2(195-210)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2024
View Options
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML FormatLogin options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in