Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3543507.3583234acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Autobidding Auctions in the Presence of User Costs

Published: 30 April 2023 Publication History

Abstract

We study autobidding ad auctions with user costs, where each bidder is value-maximizing subject to a return-over-investment (ROI) constraint, and the seller aims to maximize the social welfare taking into consideration the user’s cost of viewing an ad. We show that in the worst case, the approximation ratio of social welfare by running the vanilla VCG auctions with user costs could as bad as 0. To improve the performance of VCG, We propose a new variant of VCG based on properly chosen cost multipliers, and prove that there exist auction-dependent and bidder-dependent cost multipliers that guarantee approximation ratios of 1/2 and 1/4 respectively in terms of the social welfare.

References

[1]
Zoë Abrams and Michael Schwarz. 2007. Ad Auction Design and User Experience. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Internet and Network Economics (San Diego, CA, USA) (WINE’07). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 529–534.
[2]
Gagan Aggarwal, Ashwinkumar Badanidiyuru, and Aranyak Mehta. 2019. Autobidding with Constraints. In International Conference on Web and Internet Economics. Springer, 17–30.
[3]
Gagan Aggarwal, Ashish Goel, and Rajeev Motwani. 2006. Truthful auctions for pricing search keywords. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. 1–7.
[4]
Moshe Babaioff, Richard Cole, Jason Hartline, Nicole Immorlica, and Brendan Lucier. 2021. Non-quasi-linear Agents in Quasi-linear Mechanisms. In Proceedings of 12th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science.
[5]
Santiago Balseiro, Yuan Deng, Jieming Mao, Vahab Mirrokni, and Song Zuo. 2021. The Landscape of Auto-Bidding Auctions: Value versus Utility Maximization. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation.
[6]
Santiago Balseiro, Yuan Deng, Jieming Mao, Vahab Mirrokni, and Song Zuo. 2022. Optimal Mechanisms for Value Maximizers with Budget Constraints via Target Clipping. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm¿abstract_id=4081457
[7]
Santiago R. Balseiro, Yuan Deng, Jieming Mao, Vahab S. Mirrokni, and Song Zuo. 2021. Robust Auction Design in the Auto-bidding World. In Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2021, NeurIPS 2021. 17777–17788.
[8]
Santiago R Balseiro, Vahab Mirrokni, Renato Paes Leme, and Song Zuo. 2022. Dynamic double auctions: Toward first best. Operations Research 70, 4 (2022), 2299–2317.
[9]
MohammadHossein Bateni, Jon Feldman, Vahab Mirrokni, and Sam Chiu-wai Wong. 2014. Multiplicative bidding in online advertising. In Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM conference on Economics and computation. 715–732.
[10]
Jan Panero Benway and David M. Lane. 1998. Banner Blindness: Web Searchers Often Miss "Obvious" Links.
[11]
Edward H Clarke. 1971. Multipart pricing of public goods. Public choice 11, 1 (1971), 17–33.
[12]
Peter Cramton, Yoav Shoham, and Richard Steinberg. 2006. Combinatorial Auctions. MIT Press.
[13]
Yuan Deng, Jieming Mao, Vahab Mirrokni, Hanrui Zhang, and Song Zuo. 2022. Efficiency of the First-Price Auction in the Autobidding World. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.10650 (2022).
[14]
Yuan Deng, Jieming Mao, Vahab Mirrokni, and Song Zuo. 2021. Towards Efficient Auctions in an Auto-bidding World. In Proceedings of The Web Conference 2021.
[15]
Xavier Drèze and François-Xavier Hussherr. 2003. Internet advertising: Is anybody watching¿Journal of Interactive Marketing 17, 4 (2003), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10063 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10063
[16]
Benjamin Edelman, Michael Ostrovsky, and Michael Schwarz. 2007. Internet advertising and the generalized second-price auction: Selling billions of dollars worth of keywords. American Economic Review 97, 1 (2007), 242–259.
[17]
Salman Fadaei and Martin Bichler. 2016. Truthfulness and approximation with value-maximizing bidders. In International Symposium on Algorithmic Game Theory. Springer, 235–246.
[18]
Jon Feldman, Shanmugavelayutham Muthukrishnan, Martin Pal, and Cliff Stein. 2007. Budget optimization in search-based advertising auctions. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on Electronic commerce. 40–49.
[19]
Gagan Goel, Vahab Mirrokni, and Renato Paes Leme. 2019. Pareto efficient auctions with interest rates. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 33. 1989–1995.
[20]
Gagan Goel, Vahab Mirrokni, and Renato Paes Leme. 2014. Clinching auctions beyond hard budget constraints. In Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM conference on Economics and computation. 167–184.
[21]
Negin Golrezaei, Ilan Lobel, and Renato Paes Leme. 2021. Auction design for ROI-constrained buyers. Proceedings of The Web Conference 2021 (2021).
[22]
Theodore Groves. 1973. Incentives in teams. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society (1973), 617–631.
[23]
Chang hoan Cho and Hongsik John Cheon. 2004. Why do people avoid advertising on the Internet. Journal of Advertising (2004), 89–97.
[24]
Jun Li, De Liu, and Shulin Liu. 2013. Optimal Keyword Auctions for Optimal User Experiences. Decis. Support Syst. 56, C (dec 2013), 450–461.
[25]
Christopher Liaw, Aranyak Mehta, and Andres Perlroth. 2022. Efficiency of non-truthful auctions under auto-bidding. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2207.03630
[26]
Aranyak Sitanshu Mehta. 2022. Auction design in an auto-bidding setting: Randomization improves efficiency beyond VCG. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022. 173–181.
[27]
Vahab Mirrokni, Renato Paes Leme, Rita Ren, and Song Zuo. 2018. Dynamic mechanism design in the field. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference. 1359–1368.
[28]
Vahab Mirrokni, Renato Paes Leme, Pingzhong Tang, and Song Zuo. 2020. Non-Clairvoyant Dynamic Mechanism Design. Econometrica 88, 5 (2020), 1939–1963.
[29]
Evelyn Mitchell. 2022. Programmatic Advertising Explainer. https://www.insiderintelligence.com/content/programmatic-advertiser-explainer. Accessed: Oct 1, 2022.
[30]
Roger B Myerson. 1981. Optimal auction design. Mathematics of Operations Research 6, 1 (1981), 58–73.
[31]
Hal R Varian. 2007. Position auctions. International Journal of Industrial Organization 25, 6 (2007), 1163–1178.
[32]
William Vickrey. 1961. Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. The Journal of finance 16, 1 (1961), 8–37.
[33]
Christopher A Wilkens, Ruggiero Cavallo, and Rad Niazadeh. 2017. GSP: the cinderella of mechanism design. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web. 25–32.
[34]
Christopher A Wilkens, Ruggiero Cavallo, Rad Niazadeh, and Samuel Taggart. 2016. Mechanism design for value maximizers. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.04362 (2016).

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Non-uniform Bid-scaling and Equilibria for Different Auctions: An Empirical StudyProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202410.1145/3589334.3645659(256-266)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • (2024)Efficiency of Non-Truthful Auctions in Auto-bidding with Budget ConstraintsProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202410.1145/3589334.3645636(223-234)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • (2024)Efficiency of the Generalized Second-Price Auction for Value MaximizersProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202410.1145/3589334.3645360(46-56)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
WWW '23: Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023
April 2023
4293 pages
ISBN:9781450394161
DOI:10.1145/3543507
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 30 April 2023

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. autobidding
  2. mechanism design
  3. online advertising

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

WWW '23
Sponsor:
WWW '23: The ACM Web Conference 2023
April 30 - May 4, 2023
TX, Austin, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)232
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)19
Reflects downloads up to 28 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Non-uniform Bid-scaling and Equilibria for Different Auctions: An Empirical StudyProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202410.1145/3589334.3645659(256-266)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • (2024)Efficiency of Non-Truthful Auctions in Auto-bidding with Budget ConstraintsProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202410.1145/3589334.3645636(223-234)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • (2024)Efficiency of the Generalized Second-Price Auction for Value MaximizersProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202410.1145/3589334.3645360(46-56)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • (2023)Incentive Mechanism and Resource Allocation for Collaborative Task Offloading in Energy-Efficient Mobile Edge ComputingIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology10.1109/TVT.2023.327451372:10(13775-13780)Online publication date: Oct-2023

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media