Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3508546.3508629acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesacaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

MFDNN: Mixed Features Deep Neural Network Model for Prompt-independent Automated Essay Scoring

Published: 25 February 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Most of the existing Automatic Essay Scoring (AES) models are prompt-dependent models that need the rated essays of specific prompt for training. However, there are few studies on prompt-independent AES. This paper studies how to fully use the effective prompt-dependent features to solve the prompt-independent AES problem. Different from the common method of only extracts multiple features, we consider reducing the interference between different features. We propose a new feature, called the deep dependent feature, which is extracted from the essay by a deep neural network. It is the representative feature that can distinguish the prompt label of the essay and has less overlap and conflict with other features. Firstly, we pre-scored the unrated target prompt data to generate pseudo data based on the manually extracted features. Then we build a new model, which is training on pseudo data to learn prompt-dependent information. Our model considers relevance feature, syntactic feature, and deep dependent feature. The performance of our model is evaluated on ASAP datasets, and the results show that our model outperforms the existing methods for prompt-independent AES.

References

[1]
K. Taghipour, H.T. Ng.2016. A neural approach to automated essay scoring. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2016, Austin, Texas, USA, November 1-4, 1882–1891. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D16-1193.
[2]
F. Dong, Y. Zhang. 2016. Automatic features for essay scoring - an empirical study. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2016, Austin, Texas, USA, November 1-4, 1072–1077. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D16-1115
[3]
F. Dong, Y. Zhang, J. Yang. 2017. Attention-based recurrent convolutional neural network for automatic essay scoring. In Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL 2017),Vancouver, Canada, August 3-4, 153–162.http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/K17-1017
[4]
C. Jin, B. He, K. Hui, L. Sun.2018.TDNN: A two-stage deep neural networkfor prompt-independent automated essay scoring. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2018, Melbourne, Australia, July 15-20, 2018, Volume 1: Long Papers, 1088–1097. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/P18-1100
[5]
X Li, M Chen, J Nie. 2020. SEDNN: Shared and enhanced deep neural network model for cross-prompt automated essay scoring. Knowledge-Based Systems 210 (2020) 106491
[6]
H. Yannakoudakis, T. Briscoe, B. Medlock. 2011. A new dataset and method for automatically grading ESOL texts. In the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Proceedings of the Conference, 19-24 June, 2011, Portland, Oregon, USA, 180–189. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P11-1019/.
[7]
Hongbo Chen, Jungang Xu, and Ben He. 2014. Automated essay scoring by capturing relative writing quality. Comput. J. 57(9):1318–1330.Jason Jerald. 2015. The VR Book: Human-Centered Design for Virtual Reality. Association for Computing Machinery and Morgan & Claypool.
[8]
Y Dauphin, H Vries, and Y Bengio. 2015. Equilibrated adaptive learning rates for nonconvex optimization. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,1504–1512
[9]
W Yin, H Schütze. 2015. Convolutional Neural Network for Paraphrase Identification. In Proceeding of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies: The 2015 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the ACL, 901–911
[10]
J Mueller, A Thyagarajan. 2016. Siamese recurrent architectures for learning sentence similarity. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-16)
[11]
D. Alikaniotis, H. Yannakoudakis, M. Rei. 2016. Automatic text scoring using neural networks. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2016, August 7-12, 2016, Berlin, Germany, Volume 1: Long Papers. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P16-1068
[12]
M.L. van der, G. Hinton. 2008. Visualizing data using t-SNE. Mach Learn Res. 9. Nov (2008) 2579–2605

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ACAI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 4th International Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Artificial Intelligence
December 2021
699 pages
ISBN:9781450385053
DOI:10.1145/3508546
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 February 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Automated essay scoring
  2. Essay evaluation
  3. Feature extraction
  4. Natural language processing

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

ACAI'21

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 173 of 395 submissions, 44%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 110
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 28 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media